Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Number 3—March 2025
Research Letter

Evaluation of High-Dose Isoniazid in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment

Valentina GerussiComments to Author , Tania Petersen, Isabelle Bonnet, Alexandra Aubry, Marwa Bachir, Esther Gyde, Florence Morel, Corentin Poignon, Brigitte Rached, Valérie Pourcher, Christophe Rioux, Dorothée Vallois, Nicolas Veziris, Jérôme Robert, and Lorenzo Guglielmetti
Author affiliation: Università degli Studi di Trieste, Trieste, Italy (V. Gerussi); Sorbonne Université, Centre National de Référence des Mycobactéries et de la Résistance des Mycobactéries aux Antituberculeux, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (T. Petersen, I. Bonnet, A. Aubry, E. Gyde, F. Morel, C. Poignon, B. Rached, V. Pourcher, N. Veziris, J. Robert, L. Guglielmetti); Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis-Centre Hospitalier de Gonesse, Saint-Denis, France (M. Bachir); Université Paris Cité, Paris (C. Rioux, D. Vallois)

Main Article

Table

Phenotypic and genotypic methods for MDR TB isolates identified in France during 2008–2022 used in evaluation of high-dose isoniazid use in MDR TB treatment*

Isoniazid resistance All isolates, n = 958 Isolates from patients eligible for SCR, n = 739
Phenotypic isoniazid resistance
High-level resistance†   892 (93.1; 91.5–94.7)   677 (91.6; 89.6–93.6)
Low-level resistance‡
  66 (6.9; 5.3–8.5)
  62 (8.4; 6.4–10.4)
Genotypic isoniazid resistance
katG + inhA or its promoter mutation   161 (16.8; 14.4–19.2)   104 (14.1; 11.6–16.6)
katG mutation alone   676 (70.6; 67.7–73.5)   525 (71.0; 67.8–74.3)
inhA or its promoter mutation alone   98 (10.2; 8.3–12.1)   89 (12.1; 9.7–14.4)
No mutation
  23 (2.4; 1.4–3.4)
  21 (2.8; 1.6–4.0)
Diagnostic accuracy of genotypic testing (katG mutation) to predict high-level isoniazid resistance, % (95% CI)
Sensitivity   93.3 (91.6–94.9)   92.3 (90.4–94.3)
Specificity   86.4 (84.2–88.6)   87.3 (84.8–89.7)
Positive predictive value   99.0 (98.4–99.7)   98.9 (98.1–99.7)
Negative predictive value   46.4 (43.2–49.6)   48.5 (44.8–52.1)

*Values are no. (%; 95% CI) except as indicated. MDR TB, multidrug-resistant TB; SCR, short course regimen. †Defined as resistance to the 1.0 µg/mL dose. ‡Defined as resistance to the 0.2 µg/mL dose.

Main Article

Page created: January 07, 2025
Page updated: February 21, 2025
Page reviewed: February 21, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external