Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 5, Number 2—April 1999

Malaria Control in South America— Response to P.C. Matteson

On This Page
Article Metrics

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Dr. Matteson, whose letter relies heavily on unpublished information and nonrefereed publications, states that growing drug resistance has contributed to increasing malaria. While drug resistance is important, when DDT use declined below effective levels (1), the proportion of Plasmodium falciparum infections (including infections with resistant strains) compared with P. vivax infections (no resistance) did not progressively increase (2). Moreover, malaria has increased in Central America, where drug resistance is unknown (3-6). As for attributing increasing malaria to deteriorating public health systems, the changes imposed on developing countries (in organizational structures of malaria control programs and prohibiting DDT [1,7]) correlate with increasing malaria rates (1).

Dr. Matteson states that large-scale migration explains why almost all Brazilian malaria cases occur in the Amazon Basin. However, DDT cleared malaria from the more populated and temperate southern regions of the country (8, unpublished report: U.S. Agency for International Development review in 1973-74 of Brazil's malaria eradication program). When DDT was in full use (pre-1980), large increases in malaria did not accompany population movement (1). With the 1970s' colonization program of the Basin came malaria problems, but not large population-based malaria increases. DDT prevented that (1,9-11). However, since DDT has been eliminated, persistent urban malaria is again becoming a problem (12-16).

Other factors (biting behavior, housing conditions, and human behavior), which Dr. Matteson attributes to increasing malaria, have always thwarted interdiction of malaria transmission in the Amazon Basin (17;18; an unpublished report: U.S. Agency for International Development review in 1973-74 of the malaria eradication program in Brazil) and are no more important today than they were before.

A UN-facilitated global negotiation process cited as a meaningful debate for malaria control is an effort to provide a legally binding agreement for global elimination of DDT and other persistent organic pollutants, not an open forum for debate of DDT use for malaria control.

Dr. Matteson claims that DDT is associated with reduced lactation. In the United States, where DDT has been banned for 26 years, mothers who stay home breast-feed for an average of 25.1 weeks—mothers who work parttime, for 22.5 weeks (19). In Belize, mothers in urban areas, where DDT is not used for malaria control, breast-feed less than 38.4 weeks—mothers in rural areas with lifetime exposures to DDT breast-feed more than 57.2 weeks (20).

The World Wildlife Fund's mass balance model of DDT sprayed in houses used to refute our assessment that DDT does not readily move away from sprayed houses also mentions that "There are against which to validate the results of this...model, although actual data...should not be difficult to obtain." (21). Studies of DDT use in agriculture show that most DDT settles where it is applied (22).

Studies have shown no meaningful population-based adverse health effects from DDT use, despite more than 50 years' exposure, and evidence argues forcefully that DDT does not cause breast cancer (23).


Donald R. Roberts and Larry L. Laughlin
Author affiliations: The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA



  1. Roberts  DR, Laughlin  LL, Hsheih  P, Legters  LJ. DDT, global strategies, and a malaria control crisis in South America. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:295302. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brasil. Registro de casos de malária—1960 a 1997. Gerência Técnica de Malária/FNS-Brasilia, Brasilia, Brasil.
  3. Pan American Health Organization. Status of malaria programs in the Americas. XL report. Washington. Organization. 1991;:145.
  4. Pan American Health Organization. Status of malaria programs in the Americas. XLII report. Washington. Organization. 1994;:116.
  5. Pan American Health Organization. Status of malaria programs in the Americas. XLIII report. Washington. Organization. 1995;:25.
  6. Pan American Health Organization. Status of malaria programs in the Americas. XLIV report. Washington. Organization. 1996;:23.
  7. Roberts  DR. Resurgent malaria: DDT and global control. US Med. 1998;34:368.
  8. de Bustamante  FM. Distribuição geográfica e periodicidade estacional da malária no Brasil e sua relação com os fatores climáticos. Situação atual do problema. Revista Brasileira de Malariologia e Doenças Tropicais. 1957;9:18190.
  9. Pinheiro  FP, Bensabath  G, Rosa  APAT, Lainson  R, Shaw  JJ, Ward  R, Public health hazards among workers along the Trans-Amazon Highway. J Occup Med. 1977;19:4906. DOIGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith  NJH. Colonization lessons from a tropical forest. Science. 1982;13:755.
  11. Roberts  DR. Health problems of colonists. Science. 1982;217:484. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sandoval  JJF, Diniz  R, Saraiva  MGG, da Silva  EB, Alecrim  WD, Alecrim  MGC, Histórico da malária na cidade de Manaus e proposta de controle integrado. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1998;31, Suplemento 1:141.
  13. Amaral  JCOF, Machado  RLD, Segura  MNO, Oliveira  GS, Povoa  MM. Avaliação longitudinal da infecção causada por Plasmodium falciparum e/ou Plasmodium vivax na população de duas localidades de Icoaraci, Distrito de Belem, Para. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1998;31 Suplemento 1:16.
  14. da Silva  EB, Costa  MF, Melo  YFC, Alecrim  MGC. Inquérito soroepidemiologico numa área urbana em fase de ocupação, na cidade de Novo Aryao-Amazonas-Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1998;31 Suplemento 1:82.
  15. Ventura  AM, Pinto  AY, Uchoa  R, Calvosa  V, Santos  MA, Filho  MS, Malária por Plasmodium vivax em crianças-I-aspectos epidemiologicos e clínicos. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1998;31 Suplemento 1:82.
  16. Suarez  MC, Fe  NF, Alecrim  WD. Estudo do processo de transmissão da malária em uma área de invasão recente na cidade de Manaus Amazonas. Estudo entomologico. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1998;31 Suplemento 1:15-6.
  17. Forattini  OP. Entomologia medica: I volume parte Geral, Diptera, Anophelini. São Paulo (Brasil): Faculdade de Higiene e Saúde Publica; 1962. p. 414.
  18. Rachou  RG. Some manifestations on behaviouristic resistance in Brazil. Semina Suscep. Insects to insecticides, Panama, Report.: WHO 1958:208-95.
  19. Frank  E. Breastfeeding and maternal employment: two rights don't make a wrong. Lancet. 1998;352:10834. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Central Statistical Office. Belize. 1991 Belize family health survey, final report. Reprinted by U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services; 1992. p. 69.
  21. Resolving the DDT dilemma: protecting biodiversity and human health. Toronto, Canada: World Wildlife Fund-Canada; 1998.
  22. World Health Organization. DDT and its derivatives. Environmental health criteria 9. Geneva. Organization. 1979;:194.
  23. Safe  SH. Xenoestrogens and breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:13034. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0502.990230

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 5, Number 2—April 1999

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.


Page created: December 10, 2010
Page updated: December 10, 2010
Page reviewed: December 10, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.