Volume 6, Number 3—June 2000
Research
Using Remotely Sensed Data To Identify Areas at Risk for Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome
Table 2
Overall |
Controls |
Cases |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | p | Mean | Range | Mean | (Range) |
Band 1 | 0.96 | (0.93, 0.99) | 0.012 | 111.9 | (70.6, 164.0) | 97.8 | (72.0, 134.3) |
Band 5 | 1.07 | (1.01, 1.13) | 0.013 | 170.6 | (110.7, 253.3) | 160.7 | (110.2, 226.2) |
Band 7 | 0.91 | (0.84, 0.99) | 0.015 | 102.6 | (60.6, 163.3) | 93.1 | (58.2, 140.4) |
Elevation | 4.60 | (1.96, 10.79) | 0.005 | 1935 | (1465, 2500) | 2081 | (1825, 2341) |
Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and statistical significance of HPS predictor variables. Odds ratios of the Thematic Mapper bands indicate the change in risk for each unit change in digital number recorded by the satellite sensor. Elevation was divided as either above or below 2,094 m for the analysis. There was no difference between the Training and Validation areas, as tested by t-test (t). The Controls and Cases columns show the mean and range of values at the control and case sites, respectively.
ns = not shown
Page created: December 16, 2010
Page updated: December 16, 2010
Page reviewed: December 16, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.