Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 5—October 2001
Letter

Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Producing PER-1 Extended-Spectrum Serine-β-Lactamase and VIM-2 Metallo-β-Lactamase

On This Page
Article Metrics
46
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, secondary beta-lactamases with extended substrate specificity can be responsible for acquired resistance to the most powerful antipseudomonal beta-lactams, such as expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems (1). A number of these enzymes have been described, including extended-spectrum serine-beta-lactamases (ESBLs) of groups 2be and 2d (e.g., PER-1 and various OXA-type enzymes) (2,3) and metallo-beta-lactamases of group 3 (e.g., IMP-1 and the recently described VIM-1 and VIM-2 enzymes) (2,4,5). The secondary ESBLs can degrade penicillins, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, and monobactams (but not carbapenems) and are often susceptible to serine-beta-lactamase inhibitors (1-3). The secondary metallo-beta-lactamases, on the other hand, are notable for their carbapenemase activity and can degrade virtually all beta-lactams except monobactams, while being resistant to the currently available inhibitors (1,2,5,6).

On March 2000, a multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (isolate VA-182/00) was isolated in pure culture from a bronchial washing of a 58-year-old patient with multiple myeloma. The patient had been admitted 15 days earlier to the Varese University Hospital with a diagnosis of pneumonia and had been treated with ciprofloxacin (0.5 g twice a day) plus piperacillin (2 g three times a day) for 12 days, and then with imipenem/cilastatin (0.5 g three times a day). No cultures of respiratory tract specimens were done earlier in hospitalization. Multiple myeloma had been diagnosed in 1997, and the patient had been treated with multiple cycles of antiproliferative chemotherapy and had received autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. According to clinical records, P. aeruginosa had not been isolated previously during this patient's protracted illness. In vitro susceptibility testing showed that the P. aeruginosa isolate was resistant to mezlocillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicyn (MICs, >128 µg/mL), amikacin (MIC, 64 µg/mL), ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin (MICs, >32 µg/mL). Only piperacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam had MIC values slightly lower than the breakpoints for resistance (64 µg/mL and 48/4 µg/mL, respectively), although--considering the normal MICs of piperacillin for susceptible P. aeruginosa (2-8 µg/mL)--it was evident that the isolate also had considerable biological resistance to these drugs. A double disk-diffusion test, carried out with standard disks placed 20 mm apart (center-to-center), showed synergy between clavulanate and aztreonam. The treatment was changed to piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g four times a day), and a slow recovery ensued over a 30-day period. The patient died 3 months later following a relapse of the underlying malignancy.

The unusually high carbapenem MICs exhibited by VA-182/00 suggested production of a secondary metallo-beta-lactamase, while the synergy between clavulanate and aztreonam suggested production of a secondary serine ESBL. A crude extract of that isolate, assayed spectrophotometrically (7), exhibited imipenem-hydrolyzing activity (94 nmol/min/mg protein, inhibited by EDTA) as well as aztreonam-hydrolyzing activity (11 nmol/min/mg protein, resistant to EDTA). Analytic isoelectric focusing (IEF) of the extract, followed by development with the nitrocefin chromogenic substrate (7), showed three bands of beta-lactamase activity of pIs 5.4, 5.6, and 6.3, suggesting the presence of at least three different secondary enzymes. A colony-blot hybridization with probes for the blaIMP, blaVIM, and blaPER resistance genes (all of which have been previously detected in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from the same hospital [8,9; Luzzaro F, unpub. data]) yielded positive results with both the blaVIM and the blaPER probes. Amplification of the resistance genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers VIM/DIA-f (5'-CAgATTgCCgATggTgTTTgg) and VIM/DIA-r (5'-AggTgggCCATTCAgCCAgA) for blaVIM genes (4,5) and BLAPER-f (5'-gggACA(g/A)TC(g/C)(g/T)ATgAATgTCA) and BLAPER-r (5'-ggg(C/T)(g/C)gCTTAgATAgTgCTgAT) for blaPER genes (9), yielded amplicons of the expected sizes (522 and 966 bp, respectively). Direct amplicon sequencing identified the two beta-lactamase determinants as blaVIM-2 (5) and blaPER-1 (10), respectively, a finding consistent with the pIs 5.6 and 5.4 beta-lactamase bands detected in IEF (3,5). Conjugative transfer of the resistance determinants to Escherichia coli proved unsuccessful. In a Southern blot analysis of total undigested DNA from VA-182/00, both the blaVIM and blaPER probes apparently hybridized to the chromosomal DNA band; no plasmid bands recognized by either probe were detected. A PCR experiment with primers OXA10-f (5'-ggAACAAAgAgTTCTCTgCC) and OXA105-r (5'-TTAgCCACCAATgATgCC(C/T)TC), suitable for amplification of blaOXA genes of the OXA-10 group, did not yield an amplicon of the expected size (719 bp), suggesting that the pI 6.3 beta-lactamase band detected by IEF did not correspond to an enzyme of this group.

This is the first observation of a P. aeruginosa clinical isolate simultaneously producing a secondary PER-1 ESBL and a secondary metallo-beta-lactamase. The finding, observed in a hospital where both the resistance genes (blaPER-1 and blaVIM-2) had been detected separately among clinical isolates, underscores the possibility of the emergence of new threatening combinations of resistance determinants among nosocomial pathogens. In fact, the recruitment of similar resistance determinants within a single P. aeruginosa strain can determine a resistance phenotype to virtually all the available antipseudomonal beta-lactams, an occurrence that can be particularly dramatic when, as in the present case, resistance to beta-lactams is associated with resistance against aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. In this case, only piperacillin (which appears to be a relatively poor substrate for both enzymes [3,5]) retained moderate activity in vitro and, administered at high dosage in combination with tazobactam, was apparently effective in vivo. Should a similar resistance phenotype disseminate, it might have strategic implications for the development of new beta-lactamase inhibitors and for selection of beta-lactam compounds to associate wth inhibitors.

Top

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by grant no. FMRX-CT98-0232 from the European Training and Mobility of Researchers Network on metallo-beta-lactamases.

Top

Jean-Denis Docquier*, Francesco Luzzaro†, Gianfranco Amicosante‡, Antonio Toniolo†, and Gian Maria Rossolini*
Author affiliations: *Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Siena, Siena, Italy; †Laboratorio di Microbiologia, Ospedale di Circolo e Università dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy; ‡Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Biomediche, Università di L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy

Top

References

  1. Livermore  DM. Beta-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8:55784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bush  K, Jacoby  GA, Medeiros  AA. A functional classification scheme for beta-lactamases and its correlation with molecular structure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:121133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nordmann  P, Ronco  E, Naas  T, Duport  C, Michel-Briand  Y, Labia  R. Characterization of a novel beta-lactamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:9629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lauretti  L, Riccio  ML, Mazzariol  A, Cornaglia  G, Amicosante  G, Fontana  R, Cloning and characterization of blaVIM, a new integron-borne metallo-beta-lactamase gene from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43:158490.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Poirel  L, Naas  T, Nicholas  D, Collet  L, Bellais  S, Cavallo  JD, Characterization of VIM-2, a carbapenem-hydrolyzing metallo-beta-lactamase and its plasmid- and integron-borne gene from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:8917. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Franceschini  N, Caravelli  B, Docquier  JD, Galleni  M, Frere  JM, Amicosante  G, Purification and biochemical characterization of the VIM-1 metallo-beta-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:30037. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Livermore  DM, Williams  JD. Beta-lactams: mode of action and mechanisms of bacterial resistance. In: Lorian V, editor. Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine. 4th ed. Baltimore: William & Wilkins; 1996. p. 502-78.
  8. Luzzaro  F, Mantengoli  E, Perilli  M, Lombardi  G, Orlandi  V, Orsatti  A, Dynamics of a nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing the PER-1 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:186570. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pereira  M, Perilli  M, Mantengoli  E, Luzzaro  F, Toniolo  A, Rossolini  GM, PER-1 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in an Alcaligenes faecalis clinical isolate resistant to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and monobactams from a hospital in Northern Italy. Microb Drug Resist. 2000;6:8590. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nordmann  P, Naas  T. Sequence analysis of PER-1 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and comparison with class A beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:10414.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0705.010528

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 7, Number 5—October 2001

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Page created: April 26, 2012
Page updated: April 26, 2012
Page reviewed: April 26, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external