Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 6—December 2001

Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Skuse), a Potential New Dengue Vector in Southern Cameroon

Didier Fontenille*†Comments to Author  and Jean Claude Toto*
Author affiliations: *Organisation de Coordination pour la Lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale (OCEAC), Yaoundé, Cameroon;; †Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France

Cite This Article


Aedes albopictus, a mosquito vector of Dengue virus, has been recorded for the first time in Cameroon. Entomologic surveys in 2000 demonstrated that it is widespread in southern Cameroon, colonizing a wide variety of breeding sites and biting humans in every district surveyed. The presence of this vector increases the risk for emergence of dengue in Cameroon.

Aedes albopictus is among the most important arbovirus vectors in the world, particularly for Dengue virus (DV) (1). The microhabitats of its larvae are mainly tree holes and a wide variety of containers. The eggs can survive desiccation for several months. The adult biology of Ae. albopictus is similar to that of the urban population of Ae. aegypti, a dengue and yellow fever vector (2). The characteristics of its eggs, its close association with humans, and increasing intercontinental travel have favored the expanding global distribution of this Asian species (3).

Ae. albopictus was recorded in North America as early as 1972. Established populations were detected in 1985, imported from Asia in used tires (4). Its presence was reported in Brazil in 1986, then in the Pacific islands and the Caribbean islands, and more recently in Europe (Albania, Italy, and France) (5,6).

In Africa, this vector was observed for the first time in 1989 in South Africa. After its eggs were introduced in tires from Japan (7), Ae. albopictus was recorded in Nigeria in 1991 (8), where it has become widespread. To date, this vector has not been observed in other sub-Saharan countries.

Surveys of Ae. aegypti distribution conducted from 1950 to 1995 in several regions in Cameroon did not record Ae. albopictus. A large trial conducted in 1976 in 84 locations recorded 1,112 Ae. aegypti-positive larval development sites but none positive for Ae. albopictus (9). Moreover, entomologic investigations during two yellow fever epidemics in 1990 and 1995 in North Cameroon recorded only Ae. aegypti (10; unpub. report: Enquête entomo-épidémiologique sur deux cas mortels de fièvre jaune survenus dans la ville de Ngaoundéré [Province de l'Adamaoua, Cameroun], ORSTOM laboratory, Centre Pasteur of Cameroon, 1995). DV has never been isolated in Cameroon.

In October 1999, one of the authors captured biting Ae. albopictus females, which prompted a thorough investigation to monitor the presence, distribution, and biology of this species in southern Cameroon.

Materials and Methods

Study Sites

Surveys were conducted in the two main cities of Cameroon: Douala, pop. 1,400,000 (4°00'N, 9°45'E), commercial harbor and largest city in Cameroon, and Yaoundé, pop. 1,300,000 (3°50'N, 11°30'E) the capital city, located at an altitude of 800 m. Entomologic studies were also conducted in Campo (2°30'N, 9°50'E; pop. 4,000), Edea (3°45'N, 10°10'E; pop. 100,000), and Bafia (4°45'N, 11°15'E; pop. 50,000).

Larvae and Adult Mosquito Collections

Larval development sites of mosquitoes were investigated in four districts in Yaoundé (Gare, Cité Verte, Brasseries, and Biyemassi), four districts in Douala (Dibom, New Bell, Bonaberi, and Makepe), and three districts in Edea and Bafia. Approximately 20 potential breeding sites containing water were sampled in each district in Yaoundé and Douala; an average of seven breeding sites were sampled in each district in Edea and Bafia. A breeding site was recorded as positive when it contained mosquito larvae or pupae, whatever the species.

Biting behavior of mosquitoes was checked by five adult volunteers in the districts of Yaoundé, Douala, and Campo. These volunteers collected mosquitoes landing on their arms or legs from 5:00 to 6:30 p.m. All surveys were conducted in October and November 2000, at the end of the long rainy season.

Larvae and adults were identified by the morphologic identification keys and morphologic descriptions of African Aedes species (11-13). Male genitalia were dissected and examined under a microscope.


Ae. albopictus was present in all five towns and in every district sampled. Species identification was confirmed on larvae and adult males and females. Of the positive larval development sites sampled, 75% of 36 in Yaoundé and 45% of 53 in Douala contained Ae. albopictus larvae. Ae. albopictus was found in five breeding sites in Edea and seven in Bafia (Table).

The volume of water in Ae. albopictus-positive breeding sites ranged from 50 mL to 100 L. Species found together in the same sites were Ae. aegypti, Anopheles gambiae s.s., Culex gr. decens, Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. poicilipes, Cx. duttoni, Cx. (Culiciomyia) sp., Cx. (Lutzia) tigripes, and Eretmapodites quinquevittatus. Of breeding sites positive for Ae. albopictus or Ae. aegypti, both species were found together in 68% of sites in Yaoundé, 50% in Douala, 33% in Edea, and 38% in Bafia.

Late afternoon captures of adults demonstrated that Ae. albopictus is anthropophilic. The average number of Ae. albopictus females collected per volunteer from 5:00 to 6:30 p.m. was 1.1 (range 0 to 8) in Douala and 3.0 (range 0 to 17) in Yaoundé. Other species collected were Ae. aegypti, An. gambiae s.s., Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. antennatus, Cx. perfuscus, Cx. from neavei group, Cx. from decens group, Er. quinquevittatus, Mansonia uniformis, and Ma. africana. Ae. albopictus was the species most often captured, accounting for 35% of all the mosquitoes.


In 2000, Ae. albopictus was already widespread in South Cameroon. It was present in all the districts and towns sampled, in a wide variety of breeding sites, the most common being used tires, as described elsewhere (2). Used or retread tires are imported regularly from the United States, Nigeria, and South Africa, countries where Ae. albopictus is present (unpub. data, Ministry of Commerce, Cameroon). This observation strongly suggests that this species was introduced to Cameroon in this way, likely on multiple occasions in different regions.

The species is frequently associated with Ae. aegypti, as observed in other countries (14). Some observations from regions where Ae. albopictus was recently introduced suggest it tends to supplant Ae. aegypti (15). Such interspecific competition was experimentally observed in an insectary (16). The absence of Ae. albopictus in the lists of mosquito species observed in Cameroon before 1995 suggests that this species has colonized South Cameroon recently and that its diffusion has been rapid, as was the case in neighboring Nigeria and in America and Europe.

Ae. albopictus is a competent vector for DV. Because this disease is expanding in the world (17), data are needed on the actual distribution of Ae. albopictus throughout Cameroon and the potential risk for transmission of arbovirus. Surveillance of used tires, which seem to be its preferred breeding sites, can provide maximum information on species distribution at the lowest cost-effective rate. The presence of this vector, in association with Ae. aegypti, increases the risk for emergence of dengue in Cameroon.

Dr. Fontenille is head of the medical entomology laboratory of OCEAC (Organisation de Coordination pour la lutte contre les Endémies en Afrique Centrale), Yaounde, Cameroon. For 20 years, he has conducted research in Africa on arboviruses and malaria vectors.

Mr. Toto is a technician in the medical entomology laboratory of OCEAC.



We thank Sue Gartland for help with the English translation.

This work was funded by l'Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), France.



  1. Shroyer  DA. Aedes albopictus and arboviruses: a concise review of the literature. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1987;2:4248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hawley  WA. The biology of Aedes albopictus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1988;4:140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rodhain  F. Problèmes posés par l'expansion d'Aedes albopictus. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1996;89:13741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hawley  WA, Reiter  P, Coperland  RS, Pumpuni  CB, Craig  GB Jr. in North America: probable introduction in used tires from Northern Asia. Science. 1987;236:11146. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalla Pozza  G, Majori  G. First record of Aedes albopictus establishment in Italy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1992;8:31820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schaffner  F, Karch  S. Première observation d'Aedes albopictus (Skuse, 1894) en France métropolitaine. C R Acad Sci III. 2000;323:3735. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornel  AJ, Hunt  RH. in Africa? First records of live specimens in imported tires in Cape Town. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991;7:1078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Savage  HM, Ezike  VI, Nwankwo  ACN, Spiegel  R, Miller  BR. First record of breeding populations of Aedes albopictus in continental Africa: implications for arboviral transmission. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1992;8:1013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rickenbach  A, Button  JP. Enquête sur les vecteurs potentiels domestiques de fièvre jaune au Cameroun. Cahiers ORSTOM, série Entomologie médicale et Parasitologie 1977;15:93-103.
  10. Vicens  R, Robert  V, Pignon  D, Zeller  H, Digoutte  JP. L'épidémie de fièvre jaune du Nord Cameroun en 1990: premier isolement du virus amaril au Cameroun. Bull World Health Organ. 1993;71:1736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards  FW. Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian region. III. Culicine adults and pupae. London: British Museum. Nat Hist. 1941;:499.
  12. Hopkins  GHE. Mosquitoes of the Ethiopian region. I. Larval bionomics of mosquitoes and taxonomy of Culicine larvae. 2nd ed. London: British Museum Natural History; 1952. p. 355.
  13. Jupp  PG. Mosquitoes of Southern Africa. Hartebeespoort (South Africa): Ekogilde Publishers; 1996. p. 156.
  14. Chan  KL, Chan  YC, Ho  BC. Aedes aegypti (L.) and Aedes albopictus (Skuse) in Singapore city. Competition between species. Bull World Health Organ. 1971;44:6439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbs  JH, Hughes  EA, Eichold  BH II. Replacement of Aedes aegypti by Aedes albopictus in Mobile, Alabama. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991;7:48899.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Barrera  R. Competition and resistance to starvation in larvae of container-inhabiting Aedes mosquitoes. Ecol Entomol. 1996;21:11727. DOIGoogle Scholar
  17. Gubler  DJ. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:48096.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0706.010631

Table of Contents – Volume 7, Number 6—December 2001

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Didier Fontenille, Laboratoire de Lutte contre les Insectes Nuisibles, Institute de Recherche pour le Développement, 911 av. Agropolis, BP 5045, 34032 Montpellier Cedex 1, France; fax: 33-04-6754-2044

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 09, 2010
Page updated: December 09, 2010
Page reviewed: December 09, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.