Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 8, Number 12—December 2002

Leptospirosis: Skin Wounds and Control Strategies, Thailand, 1999

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Phran Phraisuwan*, Ellen A. Spotts Whitney†, Piyanit Tharmaphornpilas*, Suriya Guharat*, Samart Thongkamsamut‡, Suphaporn Aresagig‡, Jayteeya Liangphongphanthu§, Kanlayanee Junthima, Apirat Sokampang, and David A. Ashford†Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand; †Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ‡Buriram Provincial Health Office, Buriram, Thailand; §Khumuang hospital, Buriram, Thailand; and ¶Northeastern Regional Epidemiology Center, Nakornratchasima, Thailand;

Cite This Article


After an outbreak of leptospirosis in workers who participated in cleaning a pond during September 1999 in Thailand, a serologic survey was conducted. Among a cohort of 104 persons from one village who participated in pond cleaning activity, 43 (41.3%) were seropositive for immunoglobulin M antibodies against Leptospira, indicating recent infection. Only 17 (39.5%) of 43 seropositive persons reported a recent febrile illness; the remaining seropositive persons were considered asymptomatic, suggesting that asymptomatic leptospirosis infection may be common where leptospirosis is endemic. Multivariable logistic regression indicated that wearing long pants or skirts was independently protective against leptospirosis infection (ORadjusted = 0.217), while the presence of more than two wounds on the body was independently associated with infection (ORadjusted = 3.97). Educational efforts should be enhanced in areas where leptospirosis is endemic to encourage the use of protective clothing. In addition wound management and avoidance of potentially contaminated water when skin wounds are present should be included in health education programs.

Leptospirosis, a worldwide zoonotic disease, is caused by spirochetes of the genus Leptospira. In Thailand, a nationwide leptospirosis epidemic is ongoing and control strategies are being explored (15). The number of cases reported from 1982 to 1995 ranged from 55 to 272 cases per year, with an average incidence of 0.3/100,000/year (5). The number of leptospirosis cases reported in 1996 was 398 (incidence 0.65/100,000); the number of cases in 1997 was 2,334 (3.83/100,000). In 1998, the number of cases was 2,230 (3.52100,000), in 1999, the number of cases was 6,080 (9.89/100,000), and in 2000, the number of cases was 14,286 (23.2//100,000) (6). In Thailand, leptospirosis corresponds with the rainy season, with an increase in cases beginning in August and decreasing in November; the peak number of cases occurs in October (6).

Surveillance data suggest that most infections occur in agricultural workers, primarily rice producers (15). Infection in humans occurs through contact of skin or mucous membranes with water or moist soil contaminated with urine of infected animals (710). Breaks in skin in facilitate infection, but no previous study has quantified the correlation between skin wounds and leptospirosis (11,12). Heavy rainfall and flooding; going without shoes; washing in streams; and occupations such as farming, working in sewers, mining, working with animals, and participating in military activities have all been implicated in human infection (7,10,1319). Despite identification of these risk factors, control strategies for leptospirosis are lacking.

In September and October 1999, an outbreak of leptospirosis occurred in the Khumuang subdistrict of Buriram, a province in northeastern region of Thailand. No cases of leptospirosis had been reported in this subdistrict for the previous 2 years. Local health officers from the Khumuang Hospital notified the Khumuang District Health Office of an abnormal increase in numbers of patients meeting the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for leptospirosis infection; 80 cases of leptospirosis were identified from September 19 to 29, 1999.

In association with the outbreak, we conducted a study of persons who participated in pond cleaning activities and used a nested case-control study to compare participants with and without leptospiosis infection. Pond cleaning activities included entering the water, pulling up foliage, and removing debris. The objectives of the study were to 1) estimate the attack rate among pond cleaners in this setting, 2) determine risk factors for leptospirosis infection, and 3) identify possible control and prevention strategies. The results of this study, including the attack rate of leptospirosis, the association between modifiable risk factors for leptospirosis and infection, and the prevalence of asymptomatic infection are reported.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Method

A cross-sectional survey of pond cleaning participants was conducted from October 6 to 8, 1999, in the subdistrict of Khumuang, Buriram Province, Thailand. The survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 315 persons from the total number who participated in the pond cleaning (n=500). All 315 persons were part of an agricultural community located in the Khumuang subdistrict, approximately 400 km from Bangkok and 100 km from Thai-Cambodian border.

Twelve teams, each consisting of three or four health-care providers (doctor or nurse, health officer, and health volunteer), visited this village from October 6 to 8, 1999. All 315 persons from the village involved in the cleaning of Nong Tad were asked to participate in this study. Two hundred twenty-eight (72%) workers consented to be interviewed and were given a standardized questionnaire. Questions included demographics and risk factor information, such as the working site in the pond, lunch eating site, clothing worn while working, other probable exposure to leptospirosis, and presence of wounds during their participation in the cleaning activity. If a participant answered yes to having skin wounds during the pond cleaning activity, his or her body was examined for lesions or scars. and the interviewer subsequently noted the affected body parts. Participants were asked if they had been ill since participating in the pond cleaning activity. Illness was defined as having symptoms meeting the WHO criteria for leptospirosis (20). Clinical information was collected through review of medical records for those participants who reported being ill and who were seen at the Khumuang Hospital. Serum samples were obtained 1 week after the interview from 104 (45.6%) of the 228 participants; the other 124 persons refused to undergo phlebotomy. Therefore, the interviewer did not know the seropositivity status of the participants at the time of the interview. The timing of the serum collections was within 1 month after exposure to the pond. Infected and noninfected pond cleaning participants were evaluated for risk factors for infection in a nested case-control study. All specimens were tested in the Thailand Ministry of Health Laboratories by using the Lepto-Dipstick Test (Organon, Dublin, Ireland), a commercial test kit with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 80% (21). This study was determined to be a public health response that did not require IRB review.

Case Definition

A case was defined as the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig) M anti-leptospiral antibodies by the Lepto-Dipstick Test in a person from the Khumuang subdistrict who participated in the survey. Persons with a positive IgM antibody response were considered to have incident cases because the serum was collected and tested 1 month after exposure and IgM antibodies last an average of 3–6 months (2224). Asymptomatic infection was defined as a positive IgM response in a person who did not report having fever, myalgias, headache, or other evidence of leptospirosis.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics and subsequent multivariable analysis were derived through the use of SAS software release 8.1 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). All variables were dichotomized except for age, which was treated as a continuous variable.

Demographic, environmental, and behavioral exposure variables were compared for infected and noninfected persons by univariate analyses. All two-way interactions between variables were tested. A multivariable model was created by inclusion of all exposures significant by univariate analysis as well as age and sex to control for confounding, and a backward elimination procedure was performed to identify exposure variables most strongly associated with seropositivity for leptospirosis infection. Confounding in the absence of interaction was assessed by comparing odds ratios (OR) of the exposure variables in the gold standard model controlling for the covariates, age and sex, with the odds ratios of the exposure variables in the reduced models without age and sex, respectively. If a difference of >10% between the OR was detected, confounding was present and the covariate was retained in the model (25). The variance-covariance matrix allowed for the calculation of 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the OR involving the estimated coefficient of any significant interaction term. A SAS macro was used to calculate the conditional indices and variance decomposition proportions, allowing for the assessment of multicolinearity for two or more variables.


Blood samples were collected and tested from 104 (45.6%) of 228 pond cleaning participants for serologic testing. The subset of 104 persons who agreed to participate in the serosurvey was similar to nonparticipants in the distribution of age (p=0.387) and sex (p=0.124). In addition, all 228 participants reported farming as their occupation. The serologic survey population consisted of 55 men and 49 women with a median age of 38.5 years (range 15–65).

Of the 104 serum samples tested by the Lepto-Dipstick Test, 43 were seropositive for IgM antibodies against Leptospira, indicating recent leptospirosis infection (attack rate=41.3%).

Infection Attack Rate and Asymptomatic Infection

Of the 43 persons with IgM anti-Leptospira antibodies, only 17 (39.5%) reported having illness that met the WHO criteria for leptospirosis; the remaining 26 (60.5%) had asymptomatic infection. Clinical information was available for 13 (76.5%) of the 17 infected persons whose illness met the WHO criteria for leptospirosis. Four people did not seek treatment at Khumuang Hosptial for their illness; their clinical information was not available. All 13 persons who sought treatment at Khumuang Hospital had a fever, 10 above 39°C. Other predominant clinical presentations included chills 84.6% (11/13), headache 76.9% (10/13), myalgia 84.6% (11/13), and calf pain 76.9% (10/13).

Descriptive Statistics and Univariate Logistic Regression

Univariate associations between exposures and leptospiral infection among the 104 persons sampled are presented in Table 1. The median age of infected persons (35, range 15–65) was not significantly different from the median age of noninfected persons (40, range 15–63). Although the infection rate in women (32.7%) was lower than that of men (62.8%), the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.091).

In univariate analysis, the pond sites where people worked and places where lunch was eaten were not associated with infection. Infection was not significantly associated with the presence of hand wounds (p=0.092), leg wounds (p=0.069), or six or more leg wounds (p=0.064). Yet having more than two wounds anywhere on the body was significantly associated with infection (p=0.004). Additionally, wearing trousers or long skirts was significantly protective against infection (p=0.038). Trousers or long skirts were worn by 48 (98%) of 49 women and 39 (70.9%) of 55 men (p=0.0002), and footwear was worn by 30 (61.2%) of 49 women and 12 (21.8%) of 55 men (p<0.0001).

Multivariate Logistic Regression

All variables associated with or protective against leptospirosis infection with a p value <0.1 by univariate analysis were included in the multivariable logistic regression model. No interaction was detected between any of the exposures. Age was retained in the model throughout the backwards elimination procedure to control for confounding. Sex did not confound any variables that remained in the model after backwards elimination and was removed from the final model. Although any type of footwear was protective in univariate, it was not independent in multivariable analysis. Multivariable analysis by using a backwards elimination procedure (p<0.05) while controlling for age indicated that having a total of more than two wounds anywhere on the body while working in the pond remained independently associated with infection (ORadjusted=3.97, 95% CI 1.56 to 10.2), while wearing trousers or long skirts was protective (ORadjusted=0.23, 95% CI 0.067 to 0.701) (Table 2). Multicolinearity was not detected among any of the variables in the multivariate model.


Symptomatic Leptospira infection is often characterized as febrile illness accompanied by other symptoms including headache, conjunctival suffusion, muscle pains, and meningismus (26,27). Yet some persons may have clinically inapparent infection or symptoms too mild to be definitively diagnosed, especially in disease-endemic areas (7,28). The advantage of using the Lepto-Dipstick Test lies in its ability to detect serum IgM antibodies against Leptospira, showing recent infection. Studies have shown that antibodies against Leptospira develop 4–6 days after exposure and can be detected 3–6 months after illness; however, the length of persistence of the IgM antibodies is unknown (10,2224). Based on this test, our findings suggest that the proportion of asymptomatic infection for leptospirosis was 60.5% in this population. The asymptomatic infection rate reported here is consistent with other studies, which have shown asymptomatic infection rates up to 70.6% (19,2730). Tangkanakul et al. reported a background asymptomatic infection rate of 8.4%–11% in a disease-endemic area of Thailand from August to December 1998 (31). This background rate is much lower than the asymptomatic infection rate that we found in our population, which may indicate that the pond may be the source of infection rather than some other reservoir. However, misclassification of these seropositive persons may be a potential bias. Persons with asymptomatic infection are unlikely to be important in the transmission of leptospirosis, since person-to-person transmission is known to be rare in symptomatic patients (9,32). The full importance of subclinical or asymptomatic infection is not well understood, and efforts to determine its significance have been limited. Future studies in disease-endemic areas are needed to determine if asymptomatic infections may play a role in population immunity (herd immunity) against leptospirosis.

We found that the presence of more than two wounds remained independently associated with infection, while wearing trousers or long skirts was associated with protection against Leptospira infection in our multivariable model. This finding suggests that more than two wounds and the use of trousers or long skirts were the strongest independent predictors and protective factors for infection. The protective effect of the use of trousers or long skirts may be essential for intervention planning in Thailand. While previous studies have suggested the importance of broken skin in infection with leptospirosis, this study is the first that we are aware of to quantify the effect of skin wounds and suggest that risk may increase with increasing number of breaks in the skin (11,12). The location of a lesion was not significantly associated with infection in multivariable analysis, and data regarding severity of the skin wound were not collected. Broken skin probably facilitates the entry of Leptospira directly into the bloodstream and increases the number of bacteria that enter the host in a given exposure period.

These findings suggest that further education efforts are needed to encourage the practice of wearing protective clothing while working in areas of Thailand with endemic leptospirosis, and may have an application in the control of the nationwide epidemic. The significant association of more than two wounds with infection suggests that efforts are needed to reduce exposure to contaminated water when persons have open wounds are present. Our findings suggest that protective clothing and avoiding exposure to standing flood water by persons with open skin wounds may decrease the risk of leptospirosis in these settings.

Dr. Phraisuwan received his Bachelor of Science in 1986 from Kasetsart University, his Bachelor of Arts from Sukhothai Thammathairat Open University STOU in 1992, and an M.D. in 1997 from Thammasat University, Thailand. Currently, Dr. Phraisuwan is an epidemiologist in the Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.



We thank the staff and trainees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Thai Ministry of Health Field Epidemiology Training Program, the Thai Ministry of Epidemiology of Infectious Disease Section, and the Northeastern Epidemiology Center, Division of Epidemiology, for their active participation in the study; and the staff and officers of Buriram Provincial Health Office, Khumuang Hospital, Khumuang District Health Office, and Khumuang District Livestock Development Office for their cooperation that facilitated the successful completion of this study.

Financial support for this study was provided by the Thailand Ministry of Health.



  1. Choomkasien  P. Leptospirosis. In: Wattanasri S, editor. Summary of disease surveillance report 1996, Division of Epidemiology, Office of Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health. Bangkok: Veteran Organization Press; 1997. p. 196–205.
  2. Choomkasien  P. Leptospirosis. In: Wattanasri S, editor. Summary of disease surveillance report 1997, Division of Epidemiology, Office of Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health. Bangkok: Veteran Organization Press; 1998. p. 198–206.
  3. Choomkasien  P. Leptospirosis. In: Wattanasri S, editor. Summary of disease surveillance report 1998, Division of Epidemiology, Office of Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Public Health. Bangkok: Veteran Organization Press; 1999. p 205–13.
  4. Kingnate  D. Natural history of Leptospirosis. In: Chokewiwat W, editor. Leptospirosis. Banghok: Agricultural Cooperation Society of Thailand Press, Ltd.; 1999. p. 7–23.
  5. Waraluk  T, Piyanit  T, Plikaytis  B, Bragg  S, Duangporn  P, Pravit  C, Risk factors associated with leptospirosis infection in northeastern Thailand, 1998. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;63:2048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Reported cases and morbidity rate (per 100,000 population of leptospirosis by year in Thailand, 1995–2000). Vol. 2002: Disease Notification Report, Leptosipirosis Control Office; 2000.
  7. Benenson  A. Leptospirosis. In: Benenson A, editor. Control of communicable diseases annual. 16 ed. Baltimore: United Book Press, Inc.; 1995. p. 267–70.
  8. Farr  RW. Leptospirosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;21:16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Faine  S. Leptospirosis. In: Hausler WJ, Sussman M, editors. Topley and Wilson's microbiology and microbial infections. 9th ed. London: Arnold Press; 1998. p. 849–69.
  10. Tappero  J, Ashford  D, Perkins  B. Leptospirosis. In: Mandell G, Bennet J, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, Inc.; 1999. p. 2495–501.
  11. Chan  HL. Bacterial infections of the skin. II: cutaneous clues to systemic infections. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1983;12:98102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Sasaki  DM, Pang  L, Minette  HP, Wakida  CK, Fujimoto  WJ, Manea  SJ, Active surveillance and risk factors for leptospirosis in Hawaii. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;48:3543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Corwin  A, Ryan  A, Bloys  W, Thomas  R, Deniega  B, Watts  D. A waterborne outbreak of leptospirosis among United States military personnel in Okinawa, Japan. Int J Epidemiol. 1990;19:7438. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Everard  CO, Bennett  S, Edwards  CN, Nicholson  GD, Hassell  TA, Carrington  DG, An investigation of some risk factors for severe leptospirosis on Barbados. J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;95:1322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kupek  E, de Sousa Santos Faversani  MC, de Souza Philippi  JM. The relationship between rainfall and human leptospirosis in Florianópolis, Brazil, 1991-1996. Braz J Infect Dis. 2000;4:1314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Plank  R, Dean  D. Overview of the epidemiology, microbiology, and pathogenesis of Leptospira spp. in humans. Microbes Infect. 2000;2:126576. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Anonymous . From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of acute febrile illness among participants in EcoChallenge Sabah 2000—Malaysia, 2000. JAMA. 2000;284:1646. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Terry  J, Trent  M, Bartlett  M. A cluster of leptospirosis among abattoir workers. Commun Dis Intell. 2000;24:15860.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bovet  P, Yersin  C, Merien  F, Davis  CE, Perolat  P. Factors associated with clinical leptospirosis: a population-based case-control study in the Seychelles (Indian Ocean). Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:58390. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. WHO. (World Health Organization, Department of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response). WHO Recommended Surveillance Standards. 1999.
  21. Naiyakowit  P, Poonsuksombat  D. Laboratory diagnosis of Leptospirosis. In: Chokewiwat W, editor. Leptospirosis. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperation Society of Thailand Press, Ltd.; 1999. p. 32–45.
  22. Terpstra  WJ, Ligthart  GS, Schoone  GJ. ELISA for the detection of specific IgM and IgG in human leptospirosis. J Gen Microbiol. 1985;131:37785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Winslow  WE, Merry  DJ, Pirc  ML, Devine  PL. Evaluation of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of immunoglobulin M antibody in diagnosis of human leptospiral infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:193842.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Silva  MV, Camargo  ED, Batista  L, Vaz  AJ, Brandao  AP, Nakamura  PM, Behaviour of specific IgM, IgG and IgA class antibodies in human leptospirosis during the acute phase of the disease and during convalescence. J Trop Med Hyg. 1995;98:26872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleinbaum  D. In: Dietz K, Gail M, Krickeberg K, Singer B, editors. Statistics in health sciences. Logistic regression: a self-learning text New York: Springer-Verlag; 1994.
  26. Heath  CW Jr, Alexander  AD, Galton  MM. Leptospirosis in the United States. Analysis of 483 cases in man, 1949, 1961. N Engl J Med. 1965;273:91522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Takafuji  ET, Kirkpatrick  JW, Miller  RN, Karwacki  JJ, Kelley  PW, Gray  MR, An efficacy trial of doxycycline chemoprophylaxis against leptospirosis. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:497500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ashford  D, Kaiser  R, Spiegel  R, Perkins  BA, Weyant  RS, Bragg  SL, Asymptomatic infection and risk factors for leptospirosis in Nicaragua. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;63:24954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gonsalez  CR, Casseb  J, Monteiro  FG, Paula-Neto  JB, Fernandez  RB, Silva  MV, Use of doxycycline for leptospirosis after high-risk exposure in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1998;40:5961. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Morshed  MG, Konishi  H, Terada  Y, Arimitsu  Y, Nakazawa  T. Seroprevalence of leptospirosis in a rural flood prone district of Bangladesh. Epidemiol Infect. 1994;112:52731. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tangkanakul  W, Naigowit  P, Smithsuwan  P, Kaewmalang  P, Khoprasert  Y, Phulsuksombati  D. Prevalence of asymptomatic leptospirosis infection among high risk group 1998. J Health Sci. 2000;9:5662.
  32. Bolin  CA, Koellner  P. Human-to-human transmission of Leptospira interrogans by milk. J Infect Dis. 1988;158:2467.PubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid0812.020180

Table of Contents – Volume 8, Number 12—December 2002

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

David A. Ashford, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1600 Clifton Road Mailstop C09, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA; fax: 404-639-3970;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 19, 2010
Page updated: July 19, 2010
Page reviewed: July 19, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.