Volume 8, Number 6—June 2002
Research
Drought-Induced Amplification of Saint Louis encephalitis virus, Florida
Table 2
Bivariate Best Fits |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site | Antecedent WTD (wks) | Coincident WTD (wks) | Whole model fit p value | Intercept | Antecedent slope | Antecedent slope p value | Coincident slope | Coincident slope p value |
Site 1 | 12 | 1 | 0.0001 | 29.49 | 26.80 | 0.0005 | -8.98 | 0.0085 |
Site 2 | 16 | 2 | 0.0001 | 17.83 | 14.13 | 0.0008 | -3.62 | 0.068 |
Site 3 | 17 | 2 | 0.0001 | 22.11 | 18.64 | 0.0001 | -5.26 | 0.0071 |
Site 4 | 15 | 1 | 0.0001 | 28.92 | 24.63 | 0.0011 | -7.26 | 0.0096 |
Site 5 | 15 | 2 | 0.0001 | 21.60 | 23.19 | 0.0002 | -11.37 | 0.0012 |
All five sites | 17 | 2 | 0.0001 | 19.03 | 18.06 | 0.0001 | -6.21 | 0.0005 |
aThe probability of SLEV transmission incidence is represented as a function of two time lags of weekly averaged modeled water table depth (WTD). Whole model goodness-of-fit and individual parameter estimates were assessed as per the univariate analysis.
Page created: July 16, 2010
Page updated: July 16, 2010
Page reviewed: July 16, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.