Volume 8, Number 9—September 2002
Research
Public Health Impact of Reemergence of Rabies, New York
Table 1
Animal species | No. (%)of rabid animals |
No. (range)b of humans receiving PET | |
---|---|---|---|
without human exposure | with human exposure | ||
Raccoon Skunk Bat Fox Cat Cow Woodchuck Deer Dog Horse Beaver Goat Bobcat Coyote Rabbit Sheep Ferret Otherc Total | 4,983 (79.1) 895 (14.2) 221 (3.5) 101 (1.6) 18 (0.3) 12 (0.8) 44 (0.7) 14 (0.2) 3 (<0.1) 1 (<0.1) 2 (<0.1) 0 0 1 (<0.1) 1 (<0.1) 0 0 6 (<0.1) 6,302 (100) | 1,666 (65.2) 266 (10.4) 184 (7.2) 127 (5.0) 166 (6.5) 54 (2.1) 21 (0.8) 10 (0.4) 20 (0.8) 22 (0.9) 4 (0.2) 4 (0.2) 3 (<0.1) 2 (<0.1) 2 (<0.1) 2 (<0.1) 2 (<0.1) 1 (<0.1) 2,556 (100) | 2,944 (1–25) 470 (1–8) 377 (1–12) 229 (1–10) 844 (1–36) 246 (1–30) 32 (1–5) 42 (1–13) 286 (1–37) 139 (1–14) 9 (1–3) 476 (1–465) 7 (1–4) 2 (1) 12 (5–7) 7 (2–5) 16 (3–13) 1 (1) 6,139 (1–465) |
aPET, postexposure treatment.
bRange of number of PETs for a single exposure incident for a rabid animal
cOther species included one rabid opossum resulting in human PET, three rabid opossums, one fisher, one pig, and one otter without consequent human PET.
Page created: July 16, 2010
Page updated: July 16, 2010
Page reviewed: July 16, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.