Volume 9, Number 7—July 2003
Sulfa Resistance and Dihydropteroate Synthase Mutants in Recurrent Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Nahimana A, Rabodonirina M, Helweg-Larsen J, Meneau I, Francioli P, Bille J, et al. Sulfa Resistance and Dihydropteroate Synthase Mutants in Recurrent Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(7):864-867. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0907.020753|
|AMA||Nahimana A, Rabodonirina M, Helweg-Larsen J, et al. Sulfa Resistance and Dihydropteroate Synthase Mutants in Recurrent Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2003;9(7):864-867. doi:10.3201/eid0907.020753.|
|APA||Nahimana, A., Rabodonirina, M., Helweg-Larsen, J., Meneau, I., Francioli, P., Bille, J....Hauser, P. M. (2003). Sulfa Resistance and Dihydropteroate Synthase Mutants in Recurrent Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 9(7), 864-867. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid0907.020753.|
Failure of sulfa or sulfone prophylaxis is associated with mutations in Pneumocystis carinii gene coding for dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS). The DHPS genotype was analyzed in AIDS patients who had two separate episodes of P. carinii pneumonia. The results suggest that DHPS mutations can be selected de novo within patients by the pressure of a sulfa or sulfone drug.
Co-trimoxazole, the antifolate drug combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, is the drug of choice for the prophylaxis and treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), a life-threatening disease in immunosuppressed patients. Trimethoprim is an inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase, whereas sulfamethoxazole inhibits dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS). The antipneumocystis activity is believed to be due mainly to sulfamethoxazole (1). Dapsone is a sulfone drug, also frequently used, that targets DHPS. Widespread use of sulfa and sulfone drugs to prevent and treat PCP in recent years has correlated with an increase of the prevalence of mutations in the gene coding for DHPS (2,3). The most frequent DHPS mutations occur at nucleotide positions 165 and 171, which lead to an amino acid change at positions 55 (Thr to Ala) and 57 (Pro to Ser). These mutations are located in the sulfa-binding site and may appear as either a single or double mutation in the same isolate. Similar mutations in other microbial pathogens confer sulfa resistance (4,5). In P. carinii, DHPS mutations are associated with failure of sulfa or sulfone prophylaxis (1,6) and decreased survival of the patient at 3 months after PCP (2). However, patients harboring P. carinii types with DHPS mutations are most often successfully treated with high-dose co-trimoxazole (6). Because a standardized culture system for P. carinii does not exist, the level of sulfa resistance conferred by these mutations cannot be determined with in vitro susceptibility tests. A key issue is whether the recent emergence of DHPS mutations is a result of P. carinii transmission between patients or arises from selection within patients by the pressure of a sulfa or sulfone drug, two possibilities that are not mutually exclusive. To investigate the latter possibility, we analyzed patients who had had two separate episodes of PCP.
P. carinii DNA was extracted from bronchoalveolar lavage specimens by using the Qiamp Blood Kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). Bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from 13 patients with recurrent PCP episodes were collected from four European hospitals (Lyon, France; Copenhagen, Denmark; Lausanne, Switzerland; and La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland). To determine the prevalence of the different P. carinii molecular types, we analyzed bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from 310 PCP patients from two Swiss hospitals (Lausanne, 111 patients; Zurich, 64 patients) and Lyon’s hospital (135 patients). Specific information on demographic and clinical characteristics, chemoprophylaxis, and treatment regimens were obtained from the medical charts. P. carinii infecting humans (now named P. jiroveci ) was typed by using the multilocus method developed in our laboratory as previously described (8–10). In this method, four variable regions of the P. carinii genome are amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by the detection of polymorphisms using single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP). A P. carinii type is defined by a combination of four alleles corresponding to the four genomic regions. If a specimen harbored two alleles of one or more of the four genomic regions, the patient was considered to be co-infected with two or more P. carinii types (9). This typing system has been validated and the stability of its markers assessed; its index of discriminatory power has been estimated to be 0.93 (10). The full length of the DHPS gene was amplified by PCR as described previously (1). PCR products (765 bp) were cloned, and both strands were sequenced (5 clones per sample). The five clones had identical sequences for all samples, except for those from patients 3 and 4, which contained a mixture of DHPS sequences.
Thirteen patients with two separate PCP episodes were analyzed (Table). All patients had recovered between episodes. The intervals between the episodes ranged from 4 to 25 months. All patients had AIDS and all, except patients 8 and 9, were men, with a median age of 35 (range 23–51) and median CD4 cell count of 9.5 cells/μL (range 0–98). Some patients were co-infected with two different P. carinii types, as shown by PCR-SSCP multilocus typing method (patients 4, 5, 8, 11, and 13) or DHPS genotyping (patients 3 and 4). In seven (54%) patients (patients 1–7), the same PCR-SSCP type was observed in both episodes of PCP; six (46%) patients (patients 8–13) had different types in the first and second episodes. This rate of genotype switch is similar to that reported in previous studies, in which such a change was observed in approximately half of recurrent episodes (11–14). The importance of a genotype switch remains uncertain. Indeed, the switch might be due to a de novo infection or to the reactivation of a genotype not detected in the first episode because of the compartmentalization of different co-infecting P. carinii types in the lungs (15).
A second episode of PCP could result either from reactivation of organisms that caused the first episode or from de novo infection with a new P. carinii type acquired from an exogenous source. In seven patients (patients 1–7), reactivation was strongly suggested by the detection of identical SSCP types in both episodes of PCP. An alternative explanation could be de novo infection in the second episode by the same P. carinii PCR-SSCP type as that which caused the first episode. However, the prevalence of the types observed in the seven “reactivation” cases was low in Lyon and Switzerland during the study period (types no. 2, 5, and 7 represented 7%, 6%, and 10%, respectively, of Lyon’s isolates; type 6 represented only 3.5% of the Swiss isolates [Figure]). Thus, reinfection with these specific types was unlikely. All Danish patients (1, 3, and 6) were infected with type 6. Although no prevalence data for SSCP genotypes in Denmark are available, no indication of possible contact between these patients, overlap in hospitalization dates, or similar zip codes for home address suggested transmission of type 6 between these patients.
A change of P. carinii DHPS genotype between the two episodes was observed in three reactivation cases, either from wild type in the first episode to DHPS mutations in the second one (patients 1 and 5) or from DHPS with a single mutation (at position 57) in the first episode to a double mutation in the second one (patient 2). In two patients (3 and 4), the DHPS mutant strain was selected out of a mixture of wild-type and DHPS mutant strains. Because both episodes of each patient were caused by the same P. carinii types and because all patients received co-trimoxazole or dapsone as treatment, maintenance therapy, or both, these results strongly suggest that selection of P. carinii DHPS mutations occurred within the patients. The results of tests on patients 3 and 4 isolates highlight the fact that some patients may harbor genetically different strains of P. carinii and that the mutant strain may be readily selected when drug pressure is exerted. In the two remaining patients (6 and 7), the P. carinii DHPS mutant found in the bronchoalveolar lavage specimen from the second episode was already present in the first episode.
The wild-type DHPS allele was more frequently observed in the six reinfection cases than in the reactivation cases (8 wild-type alleles among 12 genotypes versus 4 among 16, Table). This finding is probably related to the fact that, with the exception of the second episode of patient 13, patients who were reinfected had no prophylaxis or did not receive sulfa drugs for prophylaxis.
In all the second episodes caused by reactivation, mutant DHPS strains were observed (7/7), compared to only two of six second episodes caused by reinfection (Table). This observation suggests an association between mutant DHPS and second episodes attributable to reactivation (p<0.02, Fisher exact test).
Our study suggests that P. carinii DHPS mutants may be selected in vivo (within a given patient) under the pressure of co-trimoxazole or dapsone and that DHPS mutations may be associated with reactivation of P. carinii. Whether DHPS mutations are induced by the pressure of the drug or preexisting and selected out by the pressure of the drug remains to be determined. Physicians should be alert to the increased risk for drug resistance during recurrence of PCP infection, although the impact of DHPS mutations on retreatment with sulfa or sulfone drugs remains to be determined. De novo selection of P. carinii DHPS strongly favors the hypothesis that P. carinii is developing sulfa and sulfone resistance.
Mr. Nahimana obtained his bachelor degree and Master’s degree in microbiology at the University of Lausanne. The present work was submitted by A. Nahimana as partial fulfillment for a PhD degree at the University of Lausanne and was performed under the supervision of P. Hauser.
We thank R. Lienhard for the samples he kindly provided and S. Picot for storage of the specimens. We also thank A. Telenti for critical reading of the manuscript, as well as J.L. Touraine, D. Peyramond, and C. Trepo for access to patients’ charts in Lyon.
Financial support for this study was provided by the Swiss National Program on AIDS Research grant 3345- 65407, Swiss National Fund for Scientific Research grant 32-56715.99; Centre de Coordination de la Lutte contre les Infections Nosocomiales Sud-Est et Hospices Civils de Lyon; the Swiss Federal Office for Education and Science for participation in EUROCARINII project, Framework V Program, European Commission; and a North-South fellowship from Lausanne University (supporting A.N.).
- Ma L, Borio L, Masur H, Kovacs H. Pneumocystis carinii dihydropteroate synthase but not dihydrofolate reductase gene mutations correlate with prior trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or dapsone use. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1969–78.
- Helweg-Larsen J, Benfield TL, Eugen-Olsen J, Lundgren JD, Lundgren B. Effects of mutations in Pneumocystis carinii dihydropteroate synthase gene on outcome of AIDS-associated P. carinii pneumonia. Lancet. 1999;354:1347–51.
- Kazanjian P, Armstrong W, Hossler PA, Burman W, Richardson J, Lee CH, Pneumocystis carinii mutations are associated with duration of sulfa or sulfone prophylaxis exposure in AIDS patients. J Infect Dis. 2000;182:551–7.
- Olliaro P. Mode of action and mechanisms of resistance for antimalarial drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2001;89:207–19.
- Sköld O. Sulfonamide resistance: mechanisms and trends. Drug Resist Updat. 2001;32:1608–14.
- Navin TR, Beard CB, Huang L, del Rio C, Lee S, Pieniazek NJ, Effects of mutations in Pneumocystis carinii dihydropteroate synthase gene on outcome of P carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV-1: a prospective study. Lancet. 2001;358:545–9.
- Stringer JR, Beard CB, Miller RF, Wakefield AE. A new name (Pneumocystis jiroveci) for Pneumocystis from humans. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:891–6.
- Hauser PM, Francioli P, Bille J, Telenti A, Blanc DS. Typing of Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. hominis by single-strand conformation polymorphism of four genomic regions. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:3086–91.
- Nahimana A, Blanc DS, Francioli P, Bille J, Hauser PM. Typing of Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. hominis by PCR-SSCP to indicate a high frequency of co-infection. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:753–8.
- Hauser PM, Blanc DS, Sudre P, Senggen Manoloff E, Nahimana A, Bille J, Genetic diversity of Pneumocystis carinii in HIV-positive and negative patients as revealed by PCR-SSCP typing. AIDS. 2001;15:461–6.
- Tsolaki AG, Miller RF, Underwood AP, Banerji S, Wakefield AE. Genetic diversity at the internal transcribed spacer regions of the rRNA operon among isolates of Pneumocystis carinii from AIDS patients with recurrent pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:141–56.
- Keely SP, Baughman RP, Smulian AG, Dohn MN, Stringer JR. Source of Pneumocystis carinii in recurrent episodes of pneumonia in AIDS patients. AIDS. 1996;10:881–8.
- Keely SP, Stringer JR. Sequences of Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. hominis strains asssociated with recurrent pneumonia vary at multiple loci. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2745–7.
- Hughes WT. Current issues in the epidemiology, transmission, and reactivation of Pneumocystis carinii. Semin Respir Infect. 1998;13:283–8.
- Helweg-Larsen J, Lundgren B, Lundgren JD. Heterogeneity and compartmentalization of Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. hominis genotypes in autopsy lungs. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3789–92.
- Figure. Frequency distribution of Pneumocystis carinii types observed in different locations. Each type, co-infecting or not, was considered as one isolate.
TableCite This Article
1Aimable Nahimana contributed to the design of the study, analyzed the samples by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing, and wrote the draft of the manuscript. Meja Rabodonirina and Jannik Helweg-Larsen reviewed medical charts and provided bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. All authors contributed to the analysis of data and writing of the paper. Philippe M. Hauser initiated and supervised all aspects of the study.
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Philippe M. Hauser, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; fax: +41 21 314 40 60
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: December 22, 2010
- Page last updated: December 22, 2010
- Page last reviewed: December 22, 2010
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)