Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 8—August 2004
Dispatch

Print Media Response to SARS in New Zealand

Nick Wilson*Comments to Author , George Thomson*, and Osman Mansoor†
Author affiliations: *Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand; and; †Public Health Consulting Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand

Main Article

Table 2

Information on SARS transmission and control measures reported in the New Zealand Heralda

Information on SARS No. (%) of articles (N = 261)
SARS transmission
Transmission by “droplets” or “sneezing” or “coughing” 16 (6)
“Close contact,” “direct contact,” or “physical contact” with an infected person as a risk factor for transmission 16 (6)
“Close contact” or “contacts” the definition used for outbreak control purposes 13 (5)
Possible transmission through a contaminated “surface” or “object” or lift “button” or door “handle” 13 (5)
“Person-to-person” transmission 7 (3)
Possible risk posed by bodily “secretions” (or “faecal” contamination, “faeces” or “stool”) 7 (3)
Possibility of “airborne” transmission 5 (2)
“Casual contact” not being a risk factor for transmission 2 (1)
No evidence for “airborne” transmission (or unlikely) 2 (1)
Touching ones “eyes”, or “nose”, or “mouth” with potentially contaminated hands as a risk factor
1 (0.4)
SARS control or personal protection
“Quarantine” 85 (33)
“Isolation” 62 (24)
“Mask” 60 (23)
“Hand washing” for prevention 4 (2)
Advice to seek medical attention if relevant symptoms are present 4 (2)
Lack of health insurance cover for travellers to affected areas
2 (1)
Groups at increased risk of infection and or death
Health workers (including nurses and doctors) 24 (9)
“Elderly” (and other terms for older persons) 7 (3)
Persons with diabetes or other chronic conditions. 3 (1)

aSARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome. Quotation marks refer to actual phrases used in newspaper articles.

Main Article

Page created: June 14, 2011
Page updated: June 14, 2011
Page reviewed: June 14, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external