Volume 14, Number 2—February 2008
Research
Cost-effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the United States
Table 3
Parameter or parameter set varied | Cost per QALY gained |
|
---|---|---|
Excluding anal, vaginal, vulvar cancers, $US. | Including anal, vaginal, vulvar cancers, $US | |
Higher cost per case and larger reduction in quality of life for all HPV-related health outcomes | 4,606 | 3,262 |
Lower cost per case and smaller reduction in quality of life for all HPV-related health outcomes | 21,779 | 17,825 |
Discount rate = 0%; time horizon = 100 y | 675 | <0 |
Discount rate = 5%; time horizon = 50 y | 36,503 | 34,539 |
Higher percentage of health outcomes attributable to HPV vaccine types; higher incidence of HPV-related health outcomes | 3,815 | 1,882 |
Lower percentage of health outcomes attributable to HPV vaccine types; lower incidence of HPV-related health outcomes | 24,250 | 20,265 |
All variables above (best-case scenario) | <0 | <0 |
All variables above (worst-case scenario) | 122,976 | 115,896 |
*When key parameter values were simultaneously varied in the population model of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (excluding herd immunity). QALY, quality-adjusted life year; HPV, human papillomavirus;
†The lower and upper bound ranges were the same as described in the1-way sensitivity analyses, except for the time horizon, which was varied from 50 y to 100 y.
Page created: July 21, 2010
Page updated: July 21, 2010
Page reviewed: July 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.