Volume 5, Number 2—April 1999
Synopsis
Clonal Differences among Erythromycin-Resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Spain
Table
Annual distribution of clones of M-phenotype erythromycin– resistant Streptococcus pyogenes
| Clonesa |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Total M-phenotype | A | B | C | D | E-O (biotype/T type/emm type) |
| Gipuzkoa 1988-1990 | 8 | 7 | ||||
| Gipuzkoa 1991-1994 | 80 | 76 | 1 E (I/T1/emm1) | |||
| 1 F (I/T28/emm28) | ||||||
| Gipuzkoa 1995 | 83 | 31 | 18 | 29 | 1 G (I/TB3264/emm ntb) | |
| 1 H (III/TB3264/emm2) | ||||||
| Gipuzkoa 1996 | 74 | 19 | 23 | 25 | 2 H | |
| 1 E | ||||||
| 1 I (I/T4/emm4) | ||||||
| Gipuzkoa 1997 | 56 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 2 H |
| 2 J (V/T8 25/emm75) | ||||||
| 1 K (II/T2/emm2) | ||||||
| 1 L (III/Tnt/emm3) | ||||||
| Madrid 1996 | 90 | 12 | 2 | 68 | 6 M (III/T12/emm12) | |
| 2 N (III/T12/emm12) | ||||||
| Vitoria 1996 | 33 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 1 O (III/Tnt/emm3) | |
| Total | 424c | 9 | 172 | 46 | 163 | 23 |
aClone A: biotype III, type T12 emm12, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern I; clone B: biotype I, type T4 emm4, PFGE pattern II; clone C: biotype I, type T4 emm4, PFGE pattern III; clone D: biotype V, type T8.25 emm75, PFGE pattern IV.
bnt: nontypeable.
cEleven strains were not typed.
Page created: December 10, 2010
Page updated: December 10, 2010
Page reviewed: December 10, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.