Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 1—February 2001
Research

Persistence and variability of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis Patients, Madrid, 1991-1998

Sylvia Valdezate*†, Ana Vindel†, Luis Maiz*, Fernando Baquero*, Hector Escobar*, and Rafael Cantón*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain; †Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Main Article

Table

Demographic characteristics and co-colonization status of cystic fibrosis patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection or colonization

Characteristics SM-SEa (14 patients) SM-REb (11 patients)
Gender
Male 8 5
Female 6 6
Patient genotyped 11 9
Homozygous F508 8 3
Heterozygous F508 3 5
Other 0 1
Mean age at first S. maltophilia isolation (SD, years) 13.4 (7.3) 16.7 (7.4)
FEV1 measured 11 10
FEV1 (% predicted) before S. maltophilia recovery (Mean [SD]) 68.7 (29.6) 74.2 (28.3)
>100 2 1
70-99 3 5
40-69 4 3
< 40 2 1
FEV1 (% predicted) after S. maltophilia recovery (Mean [SD]) 63.8 (20.7) 62.9 (24.2)
ABPAc condition 2 1
Death (%) 4 (28.5) 2 (18.2)
S. maltophilia bacterial counts (geometric mean, cfu/mL) 8.4 x 104 d 2.9 x 108 d
Pseudomonas aeruginosa detected (%) 12 (85.7) 9 (81.8)
Aspergillus detected (%) 7 (50.0) 7 (63.6)
S. maltophilia co-colonization with:e
Only S. maltophilia detected (%) 1 (7.1) 1 (9.1)
P. aeruginosa (%) 8 (57.1) 3 (27.2)
Staphylococcus aureus (%) 6 (42.8) 3 (27.2)
Burkholderia cepacia (%) 1 (7.1) 1 (9.1)
Aspergillus spp. (%) 1 (7.1) 3 (27.2)
Candida (%) 3 (21.4) 2 (18.2)

aSM-SE = CF patients with a single episode of S. maltophilia colonization.
bSM-RE: CF patients with repeated episodes of S. maltophilia colonization.
cABPA: allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.
dp<0.05 comparing both groups.
ePatients in the SM-RE group colonized with organisms in addition to S. maltophilia. When different cocolonizations occurred in the same patient, we recorded only the co-colonization that was at least twice as frequent.

Main Article

Page created: March 17, 2011
Page updated: March 17, 2011
Page reviewed: March 17, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external