Volume 8, Number 11—November 2002
THEME ISSUE
Tuberculosis Genotyping
Tuberculosis Genotyping Network, United States
Molecular Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains without IS6110 Insertions
Table
No./case | Spoligotype octal description | CDC designation | Country of origin | Yr reported | Source of data |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N/A | N/A | India | 1993 | (10) |
3 | N/A | N/A | Hong Kong | 1995 | (5) |
5 | N/A | N/A | India | 1995 | (5) |
3 | 577767000000011 | N/A | Asia | 1997 | (12) |
1 | 777777777760771 | 0002 | Curacao | 1999 | (13) |
1 | 477776501013071 | N/A | India | 1999 | (13) |
1 | 777701002001731 | N/A | the Netherlands | 1999 | (13) |
1 | N/A | N/A | United States | Unpublished | Arkansas |
1 | 777777777760700 | 0202 | China | Unpublished | California |
8 | 777777000000011 | 0258 | Vietnam | Unpublished | California |
1 | 777603000000011 | 1682 | Vietnam | Unpublished | California |
1 | 777777600007771 | 1128 | North Korea | Unpublished | California |
1 | 777777000000011 | 0258 | Vietnam | Unpublished | Michigan |
1 | 777603002000011 | 0870 | Vietnam | Unpublished | Texas |
1 | N/A | N/A | Vietnam | Unpublished | Texas |
1 | 000000000003771 | 0034 | N/A | 2000 | (17) |
2 | 777777000000011 | 0258 | Vietnam | 2001 | (18) |
1 | 777603000000011 | 1682 | Vietnam | 2001 | (18) |
1 | 741777000000011 | n/a | Vietnam | 2001 | (18) |
2 | 777647000000011 | n/a | United States | 2001 | (18) |
3 | 777777000000011 | 0258 | Vietnam | 2002 | Study isolates 1–3 |
1 | 700100000000731 | 0968 | Iraq | 2002 | Study isolates 4 |
1 | 577600000000000 | 0742 | India | 2002 | Study isolates 5 |
1 | 777777777763771 | 0169 | Liberia | 2002 | Study isolates 6 |
43 |
aCDC; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
References
- Mazurek GH, Cave MD, Eisenach KD, Wallace RJJ, Bates JH, Crawford JT. Chromosomal DNA fingerprint patterns produced with IS6110 as strain-specific markers for epidemiologic study of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:2030–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunlap NE. The use of RFLP as a tool for tuberculosis control: utility or futility? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000;4:S134–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Small PM, Hopewell PC, Singh SP, Paz A, Parsonnet J, Ruston DC, The epidemiology of tuberculosis in San Francisco. A population-based study using conventional and molecular methods. Stability of DNA fingerprint pattern produced with IS6110 in strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. N J Med. 1994;330:1703–9. DOIGoogle Scholar
- Jasmer R, Hahn J, Small P, Daley C, Behr M, Moss A, A molecular epidemiologic analysis of tuberculosis trends in San Francisco, 1991–1997. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:971–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Das S, Paramasivan CN, Lowrie DB, Prabhakar R, Narayanan PR. IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism typing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Madras, south India. Tuber Lung Dis. 1995;76:550–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Das S, Chan SL, Allen BW, Mitchison DA, Lowrie DB. Application of DNA fingerprinting with IS986 to sequential mycobacterial isolates obtained from pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Hong Kong before, during and after short-course chemotherapy. Tuber Lung Dis. 1993;74:47–51. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:406–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Groenen PM, Bunschoten AE, van Soolingen D, van Embden JD. Nature of DNA polymorphism in the direct repeat cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis; application for strain differentiation by a novel typing method. Mol Microbiol. 1993;10:1057–65. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dale JW, Brittain D, Cataldi AA, Cousins D, Crawford JT, Driscoll J, Spacer oligonucleotide typing of bacteria of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: recommendations for standardised nomenclature. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001;5:216–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Soolingen D, de Haas P, Hermans P, Groenen P, van Embden JD. Comparison of various repetitive DNA elements as genetic markers for strain differentiation and epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:1987–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frothingham R, Meeker-O'Connell WA. Genetic diversity in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on variable numbers of tandem DNA repeats. Microbiology. 1998;144:1189–96. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goguet de la Salmoniere YO, Li HM, Torrea G, Bunschoten A, van Embden J, Gicquel B. Evaluation of spoligotyping in a study of the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2210–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kremer K, van Soolingen D, Frothingham R, Haas WH, Hermans PW, Martin C, Comparison of methods based on different molecular epidemiological markers for typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: interlaboratory study of discriminatory power and reproducibility. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2607–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soini H, Pan X, Teeter L, Musser JM, Graviss EA. Transmission dynamics and molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with low copy numbers of IS6110. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:217–21. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sola C, Horgen L, Goh KS, Rastogi N. Molecular fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on a Caribbean island with IS6110 and DRr probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:843–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beggs ML, Eisenach KD, Cave MD. Mapping of IS6110 insertion sites in two epidemic strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2923–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soini H, Pan X, Amin A, Graviss EA, Siddiqui A, Musser JM. Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients in Houston, Texas, by spoligotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:669–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soini H, Musser JM. Molecular diagnosis of mycobacteria. Clin Chem. 2001;47:809–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Page created: July 19, 2010
Page updated: July 19, 2010
Page reviewed: July 19, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.