Volume 8, Number 12—December 2002
Research
Using Automated Health Plan Data to Assess Infection Risk from Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Table 1
Plan 1 | Plan 2 | Plan 3 | Plan 4 | Plan 5 | All | p valuea | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Procedures | 161 | 584 | 635 | 363 | 210 | 1,953 | |
Age (range)a | 67 (61–73) | 59 (53–64) | 60 (54–65) | 59 (53–63) | 72 (68–75) | 61 (55–67) | <0.0001 |
Sex, % male | 77 | 78 | 83 | 80 | 60 | 78 | <0.0001 |
Prescriptions (range) during the 180 days before surgeryb | 14 (9-22) | 18 (10-28) | 18 (12-27) | 9 (6-12) | 14 (7-21) | 15 (9-24) | 0.0001 |
Chronic disease score (range)b | 2,474 (1,774–3,704) | 2,211 (1,403– 3,456) | 2,378 (1,506–3,662) | 2,156 (1,372–3,350) | 2,369 (1,432–3,376) | 2,283 (1,446–3,511) | 0.01 |
Prescriptions (range) during the 30 days after surgery b | 5 (3–7) | 6 (4–8) | 4 (3–6) | 5 (3–7) | 3 (0–5) | 5 (3–7) | <0.0001 |
Days (range) with ambulatory care claims b | 1 (1–2) | 10 (7–13) | 6 (3–8) | 11 (8–16) | 14 (10–18) | 8 (5–13) | 0.0001 |
Diagnoses on days with ambulatory claims (average) | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 2.2 | |
Patients with specified indicator of infection % (no. of patients): | |||||||
Diagnosis during index hospitalization | 6 (9) | 3 (17) | 2 (14) | 2 (7) | 1 (2) | 3 (49) | 0.05 |
Diagnosis in ambulatory setting (excludes emergency room) | 12 (19) | 15 (89) | 17 (105) | 11 (39) | 13 (28) | 14 (280) | NS |
Diagnosis in emergency rooms | 2 (3) | 3 (19) | 2 (12) | 2 (6) | 1 (3) | 2 (43) | NS |
Diagnosis during second hospitalization, includes extended care facilities | 9 (14) | 7 (41) | 2 (15) | 2 (6) | 0 (1) | 4 (77) | <0.01 |
Antistaphylococcal antibiotic in ambulatory setting | 16 (26) | 18 (107) | 13 (81) | 14 (52) | 12 (25) | 15 (291) | 0.05 |
Wound culture performed | 2 (3) | 2 (12) | 5 (33) | 6 (22) | 1 (2) | 4 (72) | <0.01 |
Wound care |
0 (0) |
1 (4) |
2 (15) |
1 (5) |
1 (2) |
1 (26) |
0.052 |
aKruskal-Wallis or chi-square tests of the null hypothesis of no difference between plans. bMedian (interquartile range). |
Page created: July 19, 2010
Page updated: July 19, 2010
Page reviewed: July 19, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.