Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 3—March 2004
Research

Laboratory Analysis of Tularemia in Wild-Trapped, Commercially Traded Prairie Dogs, Texas, 2002

Jeannine M. Petersen*Comments to Author , Martin E. Schriefer*, Leon G. Carter*, Yan Zhou*, Tara Sealy*, Darcy Bawiec*, Brook Yockey*, Sandra Urich*, Nordin S. Zeidner*, Swati Avashia†, Jacob L. Kool*, Jan Buck‡, Connie Lindley‡, Leos Celeda§, John A. Monteneiri*, Kenneth L. Gage*, and May C. Chu*
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA; †Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ‡Texas Dept of Health, Arlington, Texas, USA; §State Veterinary Administration, Prague, Czech Republic

Main Article

Table 1

Laboratory results for outbreak of tularemia in wild-trapped, commercially sold prairie dogs

Group Prairie dogs No. of
animals Presumptive-positive samplesa Confirmed-positive samplesb Confirmed-negative samplesc
A
 Exotic animal facility, Texas, bin 1, dead animals
 47d
 7
 40
 0
B
 Exotic animal facility, Texas, bin 1, live animals
 23
 0
 20
 3
C
 Exotic animal facility, Texas, escapees
 36
 0
 1
 35
D
 Exotic animal facility, Texas bin 2 and cages, healthy
 58
 0
 0
 58
E
 Pet shop recalls, originating from exotic animal facility, Texas
 7
 1
 1
 5
F Czech Republic, originating from exotic animal facility, Texas 100 5 1 Not determined

aPrairie dogs were confirmed positive on recovery of an isolate with characteristic
growth on cysteine heart agar with 9% sheep blood and positive testing of the isolate by direct fluorescent assay (DFA) or ISFtu2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
bPrairie dogs were considered presumptive positive if primary tissues tested positive by
DFA or PCR but no isolate was obtained.
cPrairie dogs were confirmed negative if all three diagnostic tests (culture, DFA, serologic testing) failed to detect any evidence of Francisella tularensis infection.
d46 animals that remained on site August 2, 2002, plus 1 animal that initiated the outbreak
investigation (TX021935)

Main Article

Page created: February 08, 2011
Page updated: February 08, 2011
Page reviewed: February 08, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external