Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 7—July 2004

Ehrlichia Prevalence in Amblyomma americanum, Central Texas

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Ehrlichia chaffeensis and E. ewingii, agents of human monocytic ehrlichiosis and ehrlichiosis ewingii, respectively, are transmitted by the lone star tick, Amblyomma americanum, which is found from west-central Texas northward to Iowa, and southeastward to the Atlantic Coast (1). In A. americanum, E. chaffeensis has been found in several states, while E. ewingii has only been found in North Carolina, Florida, and Missouri (1,2). E. ewingii infection in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), a potential reservoir, has been found in the states mentioned previously as well as in Kentucky, Georgia, and South Carolina (3,4).

Human ehrlichioses are underdiagnosed in the United States and may be as prevalent as Rocky Mountain spotted fever in some areas (1). Ehrlichioses are prevalent in Texas, and fatal cases have been reported (1,5). This study was conducted to examine ticks from central Texas for Ehrlichia and provide information to increase public health awareness of this problem. Adult A. americanum ticks were collected from a 38.8-hectare game fenced-pasture (Plot #8) in the Kerr Wildlife Management Area, Kerr County, Texas. Ticks were trapped by using blocks (approximately 85 g) of dry ice centered on smooth, white, nylon cloths measuring approximately 1 m2. These traps were placed on the ground in the brush or in areas under tree canopies for approximately 1 h.

Trapped adult A. americanum were frozen in liquid nitrogen and then bisected with a sterile scalpel. Halves of the bisected ticks were stored at -80ºC. The other halves were pooled in groups of six. DNA was extracted from these pools by using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA), and evaluated by using a nested species-specific 16S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii, with E. canis as a negative control. The first-round primers were genus-specific for Ehrlichia (ECC and ECB). The forward primers of the nested PCR were HE1, EE72, and Ecan, which were specific to E. chaffeensis, E. ewingii, and E. canis, respectively. The reverse primer is a common primer (HE3) for all species (68). An aliquot of the negative control reaction containing no DNA template was carried through both rounds of the nested PCR with every reaction set. A dilution series of stock E. chaffeensis DNA mixed with tick DNA showed no substantial inhibition of the PCR, even with DNA concentrations as low as 0.2 ng/mL.

Tick pools positive for E. chaffeensis or E. ewingii by PCR were examined by using DNA from the individual tick halves. DNA was extracted by using the Nucleobond DNA/RNA Isolation Kit (BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). To confirm positive PCR results for individual ticks, first-round amplicons (primers ECB and ECC) were separated by electrophoresis. The 478-bp band was recovered using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit, then cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector with the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). DNA sequences were obtained from both directions of the insert in the recombinant plasmids by using PE (Biosystems, Foster City, CA) 373XL Automated DNA Sequencers in the UTMB Sequencing Core.

Of the 66 adult A. americanum ticks examined, 5 were positive for E. ewingii (7.6%). The 16S rRNA gene sequences from these five positive samples were most similar to the E. ewingii 16S rRNA gene sequence (GenBank accession no.U96436). Sequence variations are summarized in the Table. These mutations may result from polymerase errors prior to cloning. E. ewingii has never been cultured or handled by our laboratory, and all negative controls for the nested PCR were negative, minimizing the possibility of false-positive results.

This is the first report of ticks infected with E. ewingii in states other than North Carolina, Florida, or Missouri. Ticks are found in damp wooded areas (1,9). Seasonal population changes have been associated with climatic factors, including precipitation, temperature, and day length (911). These ticks were collected during August, one of the hottest months of the year in Texas, with temperatures averaging 33o C. Adult ticks are more abundant earlier in the summer, and the actual prevalence of E. ewingii infection may be higher. August is a dry month in Texas, averaging 2.32 inches of an annual rainfall of 26 to 30 inches (12). Although cases of E. ewingii infection have not been reported from Texas, this study shows the presence of ticks infected with E. ewingii in Texas.

No ticks infected with E. chaffeensis were found in this sample. The prevalence of E. chaffeensis may be so low that it was not detected in the small sample size. Also, E. chaffeensis may not survive well at this extreme of the host range. Infection exclusion may occur in the tick or reservoir hosts (or both), such that an established population of one ehrlichial species prevents another ehrlichial species from establishing itself. This phenomenon has been noted in the related rickettsial organisms Rickettsia peacockii and R. rickettsii in the Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni (13).

Another finding involves using nested 16S rRNA PCR to identify ehrlichial infection. These primers are not as specific as thought previously. Arthropods should be carefully cleaned to prevent contamination by Shigella and other soil contaminants. A single positive-nested PCR reaction should not be considered sufficient for positive identification of the organism. Sequencing of the outer PCR product, or another confirming method, should be used to positively identify the organism. Primers directed to more divergent sequences, such as the dsb gene, should be utilized in place of, or in addition to, 16S rRNA gene PCR (14).



This study was supported by a fellowship for Scott W. Long from the Sealy Center for Vaccine Development, University of Texas Medical Branch, and a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI45871).


Scott Wesley Long*Comments to Author , J. Mathews Pound†, and Li Zhao*
Author affiliations: *The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA; †United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Kerrville, Texas, USA



  1. Childs  JE, Paddock  CD. The ascendancy of Amblyomma americanum as a vector of pathogens affecting humans in the United States. Annu Rev Entomol. 2003;48:30737. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Steiert  JG, Gilfoy  F. Infection rates of Amblyomma americanum and Dermacentor variabilis by Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii in southwest Missouri. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2002;2:5360. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yabsley  MJ, Varela  AS, Tate  CM, Dugan  VG, Stallknecht  DE, Little  SE, Ehrlichia ewingii infection in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:66871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arens  MQ, Liddell  AM, Buening  G, Gaudreault-Keener  M, Sumner  JW, Comer  JA, Detection of Ehrlichia spp. in the blood of wild white-tailed deer in Missouri by PCR assay and serologic analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:12635. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Summary of notifiable diseases, United States 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;49:1100.
  6. Anderson  BE, Sumner  JW, Dawson  JE, Tzianabos  T, Greene  CR, Olson  JG, Detection of the etiologic agent of human ehrlichiosis by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:77580.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson  JE, Stallknecht  DE, Howerth  EW, Warner  C, Biggie  K, Davidson  WR, Susceptibility of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to infection with Ehrlichia chaffeensis, the etiologic agent of human ehrlichiosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:27258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson  JE, Biggie  KL, Warner  CK, Cookson  K, Jenkins  S, Levine  JF, Polymerase chain reaction evidence of Ehrlichia chaffeensis, an etiologic agent of human ehrlichiosis, in dogs from southeast Virginia. Am J Vet Res. 1996;57:11759.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mount  GA, Haile  DG, Barnard  DR, Daniels  E. New version of LSTSIM for computer simulation of Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae) population dynamics. J Med Entomol. 1993;30:84357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Needham  GR, Teel  PD. Off-host physiological ecology of ixodid ticks. Annu Rev Entomol. 1991;36:65981. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Strey  OF, Teel  PD, Longnecker  MT, Needham  GR. Survival and water-balance characteristics of unfed adult Cayenne ticks Amblyomma cajennense (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 1996;33:6373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Oregon State University. Spatial Climate Analysis Service, 2000. Texas. Average annual precipitation, 1961-1990. Available from:
  13. Niebylski  ML, Schrumpf  ME, Burgdorfer  W, Fischer  ER, Gage  KL, Schwan  TG. Rickettsia peacockii sp. nov., a new species infecting wood ticks, Dermacentor andersoni, in western Montana. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:44652. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McBride  JW, Ndip  LM, Popov  VL, Walker  DH. Identification and functional analysis of an immunoreactive dsbA-like thio-disulfide oxidoreductase of Ehrlichia spp. Infect Immun. 2002;70:27003. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1007.030792

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 7—July 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Scott W. Long, Department of Pathology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, USA; fax: 409-747-2415

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: January 27, 2011
Page updated: January 27, 2011
Page reviewed: January 27, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.