Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 8—August 2004
Research

Group G Streptococcal Bacteremia in Jerusalem

On This Page
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Downloads
Article
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
92
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: *Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; †Ministry of Health Central Laboratory, Jerusalem, Israel; †Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel; ‡Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA

Cite This Article

Abstract

Group G Streptococcus (GGS) can cause severe infections, including bacteremia. These organisms often express a surface protein homologous to the Streptococcus pyogenes M protein. We retrospectively studied the characteristics of patients from the Hadassah Medical Center with GGS bacteremia from 1989 to 2000. Ninety-four cases of GGS bacteremia were identified in 84 patients. The median age was 62 years, 54% were males, and 92% had underlying diseases (35% had a malignancy, and 35% had diabetes mellitus). The most frequent source for bacteremia was cellulitis (61%). emm typing of 56 available isolates disclosed 13 different types, including 2 novel types. Six patients had recurrent bacteremia with two to four bacteremic episodes, five had chronic lymphatic disorders, and two had emm type stG840.0 in every episode. Recurrent bacteremia has not been described for invasive group A Streptococcus. We describe an entity of recurrent GGS bacteremia, which is associated with lymphatic disorders and possibly with emm stG840.0.

Large colony-forming group G β-hemolytic streptococci (GGS) were first isolated in patients with puerperal sepsis in 1935 (1). GGS are known to be commensals and pathogens in domestic animals. In humans, they may colonize the pharynx, skin, and gastrointestinal and female genital tracts (2). In recent years, GGS have been reported with increasing frequency as the cause of a variety of human infections, such as pharyngitis, cellulitis, meningitis, endocarditis, and sepsis (2–8). Bacteremia attributable to GGS has been related to underlying conditions, such as alcoholism, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, intravenous substance abuse, or breakdown of the skin (2–7,9,10).

The taxonomy of these organisms has been reevaluated in recent years. The Lancefield group G carbohydrate may be encountered in several β-hemolytic streptococcal species, including Streptococcus anginosus and S. canis, but mainly in S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis, which is the subject of our study (11). This subspecies also hosts variants with Lancefield group A, C, and L carbohydrates. The subspecies epithet was determined by gene sequencing the group C species previously named Streptococcus equisimilis, which showed it to be indistinguishable from group G S. dysgalactiae. This finding resulted in the description of a new taxon, S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. The true proportions of the non-G carbohydrates among members of this taxon are difficult to estimate. In a prospective, population-based study of invasive S. pyogenes infections (12), we found six isolates with the group A antigen to be S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. Among isolates from infections attributable to S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis, the group C and G antigen was found much more commonly in human infections than group A (GAS) (11).

S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis and S. pyogenes share virulence factors such as streptokinase, C5a peptidase, M protein, streptolysin S, and certain exotoxin genes (13–18). The M protein is an important virulence factor because it confers resistance to phagocytosis (19). M proteins of GAS and GGS obtained from human infections have similar biologic, immunochemical, and structural features (20). The substantial polymorphism exhibited by GAS M proteins has also been described for GGS (21). We have conducted a 12-year retrospective study to establish the incidence, clinical features, epidemiologic characteristics, and emm typing of GGS strains that cause bacteremia in a large tertiary-care center in Jerusalem, Israel.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted from 1989 through 2000 at the Hadassah Hospitals, Jerusalem, Israel. This hospital is a 1,000-bed, tertiary-care center with all major disciplines represented, including hematology, oncology, and bone marrow transplantation. The mean number of annual admissions during the study period was 62,433.

Clinical Characteristics

We reviewed the records of all patients in whom a positive blood culture of GGS was reported. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Death rates were measured only during hospitalization. Descriptive statistics were performed with the SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) statistical package release 11.01. The Fisher exact test was used for differences in proportions. A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Microbiologic Methods

Patients with GGS bacteremia were retrieved from the microbiology laboratory database of bacteremia. No more than one isolate per admission was included. Clinical specimens were collected and handled according to standard protocols. During the study period, the BACTEC 460 radiometric system and the BacTAlert (Organon Teknika, Belgium) blood culture system were used.

All catalase-negative, chain-forming, gram-positive cocci that were β-hemolytic on 5% sheep blood agar were Lancefield serogrouped by using kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (PathDox Strep Grouping, DPC Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA). We had 56 isolates available for further analysis. These had been stored at –70°C in the laboratory collection of blood culture isolates. All isolates displayed large colonies and did not belong to the S. anginosus group (“S. miller”).

Molecular Methods

An overnight growth was resuspended in saline and heated at 70°C for 15 min. Bacteria were then resuspended in 50 μL of 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8. Ten microliters of mutanolysin (3,000 U/mL) and 2 μL hyaluronidase (30 mg/mL) were added. After incubation at 37°C for 30 min and heat inactivation at 100°C for 10 min, the supernatant was subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Fifty-six GGS isolates were emm typed. PCR was performed as described (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/doc.htm). Primers used for amplification of GGS DNA were G1F and G1R, previously described by Schnitzler et al. (21).

According to recommendations (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/doc.htm), the sequence of the sense strand of the emm hypervariable coding region was determined by using primer 1 (5′ TATTCGCTTAGAAAATTAA 3′) by automated sequencing (Hy Laboratories Ltd., Rehovot, Israel). The sequence of base pair numbers 30–260 was submitted by using the Streptococcal Group A Subtyping Request Form, to the Blast 2.0 Core Facility (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/strepblast.htm), where emm type was determined (22).

The 12 strains from recurrent infection were analyzed by pulsed-field electrophoresis (PFGE). Chromosomal DNA was digested with SmaI and prepared and analyzed as described with minor modifications (23).

Results

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Trends in β-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia at the Hadassah Medical Center.

Figure 1. Trends in β-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia at the Hadassah Medical Center.

The 504 bloodstream isolates of β-hemolytic Streptococcus from 1989 through 2000 included the following: 232 (46%) group A, 171 (34%) group B (GBS), 94 (19%) group G, and 7 (1.4%) groups F and C. The 94 episodes of GGS bacteremia involved 84 patients, 6 of whom had recurrent infections. Patient characteristics are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The annual incidence of GGS bacteremia was 0.0–0.2 cases/1,000 admissions during the 12-year study; the incidence ranges for GAS and GBS were 0.2–0.48 and 0.19–0.3, respectively (Figure 1).

Five patients died, but only two of the deaths were directly attributed to the GGS bacteremia. The other three deaths were related to malignancy in two patients and congestive heart failure in one.

Of the 56 GGS isolates available for emm typing, we found 13 emm types (including 2 subtypes of stG6: stG6.0 and stG6.1). These types included stG507.1, a variant of emmLG507.0 (GenBank accession no. X79527) and stG6792.0 (identical to a partial gene sequence, accession no. AF485842, listed from a blood isolate of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis), which were not in the database. The patient with the stG507.1 bacteremia had cellulitis, and two patients had the stG6792.0 strain: one was a 17-year-old patient with venous malformations of the leg and pelvis who had GGS sepsis and multiorgan failure, and the other was a 92-year-old man with diabetes and cellulitis. No association was found between emm type and year of study, season, source of infection, or cellulitis location.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Dendrogram of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of isolates from patients with recurrent bacteremia. “Patient” refers to numbers from Table 3.

Figure 2. Dendrogram of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of isolates from patients with recurrent bacteremia. “Patient” refers to numbers from Table 3.

Six patients had recurrent bacteremia, ranging from 2 to 4 episodes per patient (Table 2). All six patients had a community-acquired recurrent cellulitis and were given treatment similar to that received by patients who did not have a recurrent infection. Five patients had chronic lymphatic abnormalities at the infection site compared to 11 of 42 patients with nonrecurrent cellulitis (odds ratio [OR] 14.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5–134.3, p = 0.012). Two patients had recurrent infection with the same emm type, stG840.0 (one patient had three episodes, 1 and 7 months apart; the other patient had 2 episodes, 6 months apart). Three patients had a different emm type each episode. The isolates of the patient with four recurrent episodes were not available for emm typing. PFGE results indicated that isolates recovered from the same patient that shared the same emm type were highly genetically related (Figure 2).

Discussion

GGS are widely distributed in nature and are recognized as both commensals and pathogens in animals as well as in humans. S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis is part of the normal bacterial flora in humans. S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis is the most common species of large colony-forming serogroup G streptococci that is β-hemolytic on sheep blood agar. The animal-associated S. canis has rarely been implicated as a human pathogen, although accurate data are not available (11,24). Asymptomatic pharyngeal carriage of GGS has been described in up to 23% of humans (25), and vaginal carriage in 5% of asymptomatic puerperal women (1).

This 12-year retrospective survey indicated 94 episodes of GGS bacteremia at the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center. It is the one of the two largest series of GGS bacteremia described in the literature to date (26). Some similarities were found in the epidemiologic characteristics of group G streptococcal bacteremia between our studies and other studies. Patients were predominantly elderly men. Most patients (92%) had underlying diseases, similar to those (74%–92%) reported previously (2–6,9).

As shown by Auckenthaler et al. (3) and Woo et al. (6), malignancy was one of the most important underlying conditions associated with GGS bacteremia, affecting 35% of our patients. In our patients, the most common malignancy associated with cellulitis was carcinoma of the breast. The most common source of infection among patients with bacteremia with a known source was soft tissue infection, especially cellulitis (61%), 66% of these infections were confined to the lower limbs (6). Similarly, 48% of our patients with cellulitis had an underlying skin lesion; in 35% of the patients, it was related to lymphatic abnormalities. These abnormalities were mostly attributed to malignancy, surgery, or radiation. Two patients had a congenital lymphatic malformation.

Nineteen percent of our patients had primary bacteremia, which is within the range (11%–52%) described by others (2,3,6,7). The death rate in our study (5%) was lower than that previously reported (8%–30%) (3,6,9). One reason for this finding may be the relatively younger age of our patients: Only 22% of our patients were >75 years of age compared to those from Sylvetsky’s group, where 63% were >75 years of age (9). The small number of patients who eventually died of bacteremia precluded analysis of risk factors associated with death.

In contrast to the previous study from a different hospital in Jerusalem, Israel, describing GGS bacteremia during the same years as our study (9), the yearly incidence of GGS bacteremia did not increase. The dissimilarity in our two groups may be attributable to the differences in ages of the patients and the proportion of men. In addition, the other hospital is a community hospital with a large geriatric department, without neurosurgery or bone-marrow and solid organ transplants.

A noteworthy finding in our series was the high frequency of recurrent GGS bacteremia. We identified six patients with bacteremia, all of whom had recurrent cellulitis. Five had lymphatic drainage abnormalities. Two patients had recurrent bacteremia attributable to the same emm type (stG840, patients 1 and 2, Table 3). PFGE results indicated that within each patient the isolates recovered at different time points were clonal (Figure 2) but that the two pairs of stG840 isolates had differing PFGE patterns, which suggests that they were different clonal types.

Since two of the patients with recurrent bacteremia had an infection by the same clone, these infections may have been relapses. Recurrence of bacteremia suggests that the initial infection may not provide protective immunity. The question of protective immunity to this bacterium is addressed by Bisno et al. in a murine model of recurrent GGS cellulitis (27). Despite recurrent skin challenge with GGS, the lesion did not decrease in severity, size, or time to heal. Bisno et al. found that, despite the development of demonstrable humoral immune response to M protein, acquired protective immunity did not occur. Possibly GGS downregulates M protein in vivo, thus allowing it to evade these specific antibodies. Immediately initiating antibiotic therapy for the first GGS infection might contribute to the low level of immunity, as has been demonstrated in cases of recurrent GAS tonsillitis (28).

Cellulitis can recur in extremities or other sites where venous and lymphatic circulation has been compromised by processes such as malignancy, lymph node dissection, prior irradiation, trauma, or saphenous venectomy (10,29,30). Nongroup A β-hemolytic streptococci have been implicated as a major cause of cellulitis in the setting of circulatory compromise (31,32). Focusing on the 48 patients with cellulitis, we found that recurrent cellulitis with bacteremia was 14.1 times more likely to develop in patients with lymphatic drainage abnormalities when compared to patients without such abnormalities. Our report is the first to describe the phenomenon of recurrent GGS cellulitis associated with bacteremia in patients with lymphatic abnormalities. Recurrent GGS bacteremia seems to be more common than recurrent GAS bacteremia. In our study of 90 patients with GAS bacteremia (33) who were admitted to the Hadassah Medical Center during a 6-year period, none had a recurrence compared to 6 of 84 patients in this study (p < 0.013). Our patient with four recurrences of GGS bacteremia had in effect five additional episodes, which were not included in our report. Three episodes were cellulitis with GGS bacteremia at other hospitals, and two episodes were severe cellulitis without proven bacteremia. These cases are examples of recurrence of GGS infection in a manner not known to occur with GAS. A recent report suggested that allelic variation of human leukocyte antigen II contributes to the differences in severity of GAS infections (34). The relationship between bacterial factors and host mechanisms of defense in this patient and others with recurrent bacteremia needs further investigation.

To illuminate the unique characteristics of patients with GGS bacteremia, we compared our group of GGS bacteremia patients with two groups of GAS bacteremia patients (33,35). Sex and age of the patients with GGS bacteremia were similar to those with GAS bacteremia in a retrospective study. However, when we compared patients with GAS bacteremia from our hospital participating in a nationwide prospective, population-based study, GGS patients were older and more likely to be men than the GAS patients (35). Thus, the characteristics of the GGS patients may reflect institutional and selection bias attributable to different study methods and may not be a true tendency for older patients.

Serologic M typing was developed years ago for GAS typing, but it has also been used for GGS (36). M protein encoded by emm is a virulence factor of GGS similar to the GAS surface protein (20). emm typing for both GAS and GGS is based on the heterogeneity of the 5′ ends of the gene, which give rise to different sequence types. More than 120 emm types are recognized for GAS, and approximately 40 types of GGS and group C Streptococcus (GCS) have been identified (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/emmtypes.htm). Despite the similarities between GAS and GGS, Geyer and Schmidt (37) found that in GCS and GGS, two types of arrangements in the emm region differ significantly from the known types of mga region in GAS. The conclusion was that Mgc is related to Mga proteins of various types of GAS but forms a distinct cluster.

In previous studies, Lawal et al. used serologic M typing for 103 isolates of GGS. Fifty-six isolates (54%) could be serologically typed into eight serotypes (38). Of 128 isolates, 40 (31%) could be serotyped with six antisera (39). The inability to type a large proportion of GGS by the older serologic method is similar to the situation that exists for GAS (12).

In our 56 GGS isolates available for sequence typing, we found 13 emm types. None of our isolates were emm nontypeable. Kalia et al. (40) emm typed 18 GGS isolates from human infections obtained from various countries. They found 13 emm types, the most common of which was stG480.0 (3 of 18 isolates compared to 3 of 56 in our study); our most common type was stG485.0 (10 of 56 isolates). Thus, emm typing provides a useful tool for identifying isolates when compared to traditional M typing.

Tyrrell found a correlation between clusters of GAS M types and patient age (41). We could not find a correlation between emm type and clinical features such as patient sex, age, and source of infection or cellulitis location, although our database may not be sufficiently large to draw these correlations.

We found among our GGS isolates emm types that were previously described for GCS (stC36.0) and for GAS (stG245.0). Although stG245.0 was originally associated with S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis harboring group A antigen, it is usually associated with GGS (B. Beall, unpub. data). Kalia et al. described a few GCS emm types, which in our study were found in group G streptococci. Certain types are occasionally found in both GGS and GCS (Beall, unpub. data). The dynamics of interspecies transfer of virulence loci between GAS, GGS, and GCS (18,42–45), as well as potential genetic transfer or intragenomic events causing interconversion of group antigen types, remains to be resolved. Our findings that several isolates with emm type stG840 have different PFGE patterns may support the notion that isolates of GGS with the same emm type are not of the same clone. The relationship between GGS emm type and clone remains to be examined. In general, GAS emm typing, when restricted to the same geographic area and time period, is indicative of clonal type; however Beall et al (46), demonstrated numerous examples of apparently unrelated GAS strains (as judged by independent T agglutination phenotype and opacity factor [sof] sequence) sharing the same emm sequence type, and, more recently, nonrelatedness between distinct GAS strains of identical emm types has been demonstrated through MLST (47).

In summary, we describe 94 cases of GGS bacteremia, observed mainly in older patients with underlying medical conditions. The most frequent portal of entry was the skin. The high rate of recurrence of GGS bacteremia was an unusual and unexpected finding. Clinicians should be alert to this phenomenon, which seems to be more common than recurrent GAS bacteremia. We found that lymphatic drainage disorders were a highly significant risk factor for recurrence, and that emm type stG840.0 may have a special role in recurring disease.

Dr. Cohen-Poradosu is an infectious diseases physician in the Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Cetner. Her clinical and research interests include streptococcal infections and antimicrobial drug–resistance patterns.

Top

References

  1. Lancefield  RC, Hare  R. The serological differentiation of pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of hemolytic streptococci from parturient women. . J Exp Med. 1935;61:335–49. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vartian  C, Lerner  PI, Shlaes  DM, Gopalakrishna  KV. Infections due to Lancefield group G streptococci. Medicine (Baltimore). 1985;64:75–88. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Auckenthaler  R, Hermans  PE, Washington  JA II. Group G streptococcal bacteremia: clinical study and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5:196–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Watsky  KL, Kollisch  N, Densen  P. Group G streptococcal bacteremia. The clinical experience at Boston University Medical Center and a critical review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1985;145:58–61. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Venezio  FR, Gullberg  RM, Westenfelder  GO, Phair  JP, Cook  FV. Group G streptococcal endocarditis and bacteremia. Am J Med. 1986;81:29–34. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Woo  PC, Fung  AM, Lau  SK, Wong  SS, Yuen  KY. Group G beta-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia characterized by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3147–55. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lam  K, Bayer  AS. Serious infections due to group G streptococci. Report of 15 cases with in vitro-in vivo correlations. Am J Med. 1983;75:561–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickie  AS, Bremner  DA, Say  PJ. Group G streptococcal septicaemia: report of six cases. . J Infect. 1984;8:173–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sylvetsky  N, Raveh  D, Schlesinger  Y, Rudensky  B, Yinnon  AM. Bacteremia due to beta-hemolytic Streptococcus group G: increasing incidence and clinical characteristics of patients. Am J Med. 2002;112:622–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Craven  DE, Rixinger  AI, Bisno  AL, Goularte  TA, McCabe  WR. Bacteremia caused by group G streptococci in parenteral drug abusers: epidemiological and clinical aspects. J Infect Dis. 1986;153:988–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Facklam  R. What happened to the streptococci: overview of taxonomic and nomenclature changes. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:613–30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Moses  AE, Hidalgo-Grass  C, Dan-Goor  M, Jaffe  J, Shetzigovsky  I, Ravins  M, emm typing of M nontypeable invasive group A streptococcal isolates in Israel. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:4655–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bisno  AL, Craven  DE, McCabe  WR. M proteins of group G streptococci isolated from bacteremic human infections. Infect Immun. 1987;55:753–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cleary  PP, Peterson  J, Chen  C, Nelson  C. Virulent human strains of group G streptococci express a C5a peptidase enzyme similar to that produced by group A streptococci. Infect Immun. 1991;59:2305–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones  KF, Fischetti  VA. Biological and immunochemical identity of M protein on group G streptococci with M protein on group A streptococci. Infect Immun. 1987;55:502–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Simpson  WJ, Robbins  JC, Cleary  PP. Evidence for group A-related M protein genes in human but not animal-associated group G streptococcal pathogens. Microb Pathog. 1987;3:339–50. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Humar  D, Datta  V, Bast  DJ, Beall  B, De Azavedo  JC, Nizet  V. Streptolysin S and necrotising infections produced by group G streptococcus. Lancet. 2002;359:124–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalia  A, Bessen  DE. Presence of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A and C genes in human isolates of group G streptococci. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;219:291–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lancefield  RC. Current knowledge of the type specific M antigens of group A streptococci. J Immunol. 1962;89:307–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins  CM, Kimura  A, Bisno  AL. Group G streptococcal M protein exhibits structural features analogous to those of class I M protein of group A streptococci. Infect Immun. 1992;60:3689–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schnitzler  N, Podbielski  A, Baumgarten  G, Mignon  M, Kaufhold  A. M or M-like protein gene polymorphisms in human group G streptococci. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:356–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li  Z, Sakota  V, Jackson  D, Franklin  AR, Beall  B. The array of M protein gene subtypes in 1061 recent invasive group A streptococcal isolates recovered from the Active Bacterial Core Surveillance. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:1587–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stanley  J, Desai  M, Xerry  J, Tanna  A, Efstratiou  A, George  R. High-resolution genotyping elucidates the epidemiology of group A streptococcus outbreaks. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:500–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Whatmore  AM, Engler  KH, Gudmundsdottir  G, Efstratiou  A. Identification of isolates of Streptococcus canis infecting humans. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4196–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill  HR, Caldwell  GG, Wilson  E, Hager  D, Zimmerman  RA. Epidemic of pharyngitis due to streptococci of Lancefield group G. Lancet. 1969;7616:371–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hindsholm  M, Schonheyder  HC. Clinical presentation and outcome of bacteraemia caused by beta-haemolytic streptococci serogroup G. APMIS. 2002;110:554–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bisno  AL, Gaviria  JM. Murine model of recurrent group G streptococcal cellulitis: no evidence of protective immunity. Infect Immun. 1997;65:4926–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. el-Daher  NT, Hijazi  SS, Rawashdeh  NM, al-Khalil  IA, Abu-Ektaish  FM, Abdel-Latif  DI. Immediate vs. delayed treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis with penicillin V. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10:126–30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Baddour  LM, Bisno  AL. Recurrent cellulitis after saphenous venectomy for coronary bypass surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:493–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Chmel  H, Hamdy  M. Recurrent streptococcal cellulitis complicating radical hysterectomy and radiation therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63:862–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Woo  PC, Lum  PN, Wong  SS, Cheng  VC, Yuen  KY. Cellulitis complicating lymphoedema. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;19:294–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Baddour  LM, Bisno  AL. Non-group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal cellulitis. Association with venous and lymphatic compromise. Am J Med. 1985;79:155–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moses  AE, Mevorach  D, Rahav  G, Sacks  T, Simhon  A, Shapiro  M. Group A streptococcus bacteremia at the Hadassah Medical Center in Jerusalem. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1393–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kotb  M, Norrby-Teglund  A, McGeer  A, El-Sherbini  H, Dorak  MT, Khurshid  A, An immunogenetic and molecular basis for differences in outcomes of invasive group A streptococcal infections. Nat Med. 2002;8:1398–404. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Moses  AE, Goldberg  S, Korenman  Z, Ravins  M, Hanski  E, Shapiro  M. Invasive group A streptococcal infections, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:421–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Maxted  WR, Potter  EV. The presence of type 12 M-proteiantigen in group G streptococci. J Med Microbiol. 1967;49:119–25.
  37. Geyer  A, Schmidt  KH. Genetic organisation of the M protein region in human isolates of group C and G streptococci: two types of multigene regulator-like (mgrC) regions. Mol Gen Genet. 2000;262:965–76. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lawal  SF, Dosunmu-Ogunbi  O. A new scheme for serotyping group-G streptococci. J Med Microbiol. 1986;21:275–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lawal  SF, Coker  AO, Solanke  EO, Ogunbi  O. Serotypes among Lancefield-group G streptococci isolated in Nigeria. J Med Microbiol. 1982;15:123–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kalia  A, Enright  MC, Spratt  BG, Bessen  DE. Directional gene movement from human-pathogenic to commensal-like streptococci. Infect Immun. 2001;69:4858–69. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tyrrell  GJ, Lovgren  M, Forwick  B, Hoe  NP, Musser  JM, Talbot  JA. M types of group a streptococcal isolates submitted to the National Centre for Streptococcus (Canada) from 1993 to 1999. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:4466–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Igwe  EI, Shewmaker  PL, Facklam  RR, Farley  MM, van Beneden  C, Beall  B. Identification of superantigen genes speM, ssa, and smeZ in invasive strains of beta-hemolytic group C and G streptococci recovered from humans. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003;229:259–64. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kalia  A, Bessen  DE. Natural selection and evolution of streptococcal virulence genes involved in tissue-specific adaptations. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:110–21. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sriprakash  KS, Hartas  J. Lateral genetic transfers between group A and G streptococci for M-like genes are ongoing. Microb Pathog. 1996;20:275–85. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Simpson  WJ, Musser  JM, Cleary  PP. Evidence consistent with horizontal transfer of the gene (emm12) encoding serotype M12 protein between group A and group G pathogenic streptococci. Infect Immun. 1992;60:1890–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Beall  B, Gherardi  G, Lovgren  M, Facklam  RR, Forwick  BA, Tyrrell  GJ. emm and sof gene sequence variation in relation to serological typing of opacity-factor-positive group A streptococci. Microbiology. 2000;146:1195–209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. McGregor  KF, Bilek  N, Bennett  A, Kalia  A, Beall  B, Carapetis  JR, Group A streptococci from a remote community have novel multilocus genotypes but share emm types and housekeeping alleles with isolates from worldwide sources. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:717–23. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1008.030840

Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 8—August 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Allon E. Moses, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel; fax: 9722-6758915

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 01, 2011
Page updated: March 01, 2011
Page reviewed: March 01, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external