In February 2000, dyspnea, productive cough, hemoptysis, weight loss, weakness, and slight fever developed in a 67-year-old woman with a previous diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (47 years earlier). A chest radiograph showed post-tuberculous fibrodystrophy of the right upper lobe. Ziehl-Neelsen smear gave positive results, and a nontuberculous mycobacterium was isolated. Drug-susceptibility tests, performed on agar medium by proportion method, showed sensitivity to rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide and resistance to streptomycin and isoniazid. Treatment with isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, and rifampin was begun for 3 months without any microbiologic changes. The persistence of acid-fast bacilli and nontuberculous Mycobacterium–positive cultures in the sputum were interpreted as a chronic nontuberculous mycobacterial colonization not associated with true pathogenic damage, and no further treatment was undertaken.

Figure

Figure. A) Pulmonary computed tomographic scan representation of Mycobacterium lentiflavum lesions. Radiologic image shows the appearance of a widespread reticulonodular alteration and an opacity in the left middle lobe. B) Chest radiograph...

In March 2002, the patient was admitted to our hospital because of productive cough, weakness, dyspnea, hemoptysis, fever, and weight loss. Radiograph and computed tomography scan showed worsening chest abnormalities, with the appearance of a widespread reticulonodular alteration and an opacity in the left middle lobe (Figure A).

The sputum smear was still positive for acid-fast bacilli (polymerase chain reaction [PCR] specific for M. tuberculosis and M. avium DNA was negative), and routine cultures for mycobacteria yielded unidentified scotochromogenic mycobacterium. HIV test was performed to investigate a possible cause of immune impairment, but it was negative. Lymphocyte subsets by flow cytometry were studied and showed normal values. In addition, a killing test to evaluate macrophage activity was performed, and a diagnosis of chronic granulomatosis disease was excluded. Concomitantly, cultures from sputum and from broncholavage were performed for either standard bacteria or fungi (including Pneumocystis carinii). These cultures did not identify other pathogens. Serologic tests to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Legionella species (including urinary antigens) were performed and produced negative results, thus confirming the pathogenic role of the Mycobacterium lentiflavum.

Susceptibility tests, using proportion methods, showed sensitivity to clarithromycin, ethambutol, isoniazid, streptomycin, rifabutin, cycloserine, and terizidon and resistance to rifampin, amikacin, kanamycin, pyrazinamide, and ofloxacin. According to the clinical history, microbiologic results, and susceptibility pattern (clarithromycin MIC 2 μg/mL), treatment with clarithromycin was initiated. The patient was released after 10 days with no fever; a slight, yet progressive, improvement of radiologic features; and a substantial recovery of the clinical conditions.

All conventional identification procedures, including cultural, biochemical, and enzymatic tests, failed to properly identify the species. Moreover, many questions remained unresolved, and further clarification was needed about the origin and effect of treatment on the clinical response. Because of the need to reach a definitive diagnosis, we sent the unidentified Mycobacterium culture to one of the Italian reference laboratories for mycobacteria.

Two months after hospitalization, the diagnosis of M. lentiflavum was obtained by analyzing cell wall mycolic acids by using high-performance liquid chromatographic test and by nucleic acid sequence analysis of PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal RNA gene fragments. After 3 months of clarithromycin treatment, the patient completely recovered, and chest radiograph showed sustained improvement (Figure B). Mycobacterial investigations, which had produced negative sputum samples after 1 month of treatment, once again gave positive results. After a new evaluation of drug susceptibility that showed no change in drug-resistance pattern, a further treatment with clarithromycin, ethambutol, rifabutin, and ciprofloxacin was undertaken, but it was prematurely ended because of poor patient compliance.

At present, after a 3-year follow up, the patient complains of intermittent hemoptysis, weakness, and dyspnea. Radiographic examinations still show the known widespread reticulonodular alterations, and sputum cultures are persistently positive for acid-fast bacilli.

M. lentiflavum is a recently described nontuberculous mycobacterium (1,2). Most isolates have represented fortuitous isolations that required critical evaluation about their clinical importance. Indeed, as summarized in the Table, M. lentiflavum identification has been shown to cause disease in only few cases. All of these cases were described in Europe. Most reports describe isolates from cervical lymphadenitis of very young children (3–9); other anatomic sites are less frequently implicated (1,7,8). The few M. lentiflavum pulmonary cases were described in immunocompromised patients only (5,8,9).

We describe, for the first time, a chronic pulmonary infection due to M. lentiflavum in an immunocompetent patient. Our observation provides further evidence that this species should be added to the growing list of nontuberculous mycobacteria, which can cause pulmonary disease in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients.

Traditional identification techniques are widely insufficient in providing a correct diagnosis, and more sophisticated diagnostic methods need to be improved. Susceptibility tests have reliability problems.

When the difficulties in reaching a diagnosis are considered, the identification standard techniques, based on the rate of growth, pigmentation, and biochemical tests, even if well established and relatively inexpensive, are unable to identify most nontuberculous mycobacteria. Laboratory methods that perform better, such as high-performance liquid chromatography and genetic investigations of the 16S rRNA gene fragments, through the use of nucleic acid probes, sequencing, and amplification, have to be added to diagnostic protocols for nontuberculous mycobacteria diagnosis. Moreover, new reference centers should be created and organized. Cooperation programs among research laboratories, which have provided a structured experience with complex methods, have to be implemented, and an effective collaboration should be created.

In addition to the diagnostic uncertainty, interpreting the sensitivity tests is also of concern. Information provided by tests performed on solid medium was discordant and created serious misunderstanding in the therapeutic choices. Thus, in the presence of nontuberculous mycobacteria, the susceptibility profile must be performed on liquid media, and tests on agar by proportion method should be avoided because of the risk of obtaining false-resistant results. Because of the difficulties in executing these methods and interpreting their results, we recommend that the tests be performed by experienced laboratories that can maintain feedback for both peripheral laboratories and clinicians.

In 1998, the Italian National Institute of Health launched, in accordance with the World Health Organization and International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, a project to implement proficiency testing; results from the first (1998–1999) and second surveys (2000) showed substantial improvement in the accuracy of drug-susceptibility testing in the network. These data demonstrate that establishing and coordinating a focused monitoring program were effective in improving the quality of drug susceptibility results (10).

By describing a recurrent chronic pulmonary infection, our report provides further evidence of the possible role of M. lentiflavum as an emerging human pathogen. Our data also stress the diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties in the management of this nontuberculous Mycobacterium infection.