Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 2—February 2005

Molecular Evidence of Pneumocystis Transmission in Pediatric Transplant Unit

Britta Höcker*Comments to Author , Constanze Wendt†, Aimable Nahimana‡, Burkhard Tönshoff*, and Philippe M. Hauser‡
Author affiliations: *University Children's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; †Hygiene Institute Heidelberg, Germany; ‡University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

Cite This Article


We describe an outbreak of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in a pediatric renal transplant unit, likely attributable to patient-to-patient transmission. Single-strand conformation polymorphism molecular typing showed that 3 affected patients had acquired the same 2 strains of Pneumocystis, which suggests interhuman infection. An infant with mitochondriopathy was the probable index patient.

Despite intensive medical treatment, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is still a severe disease in immunocompromised patients, with a high death rate of up to 50% (1). The first report of human Pneumocystis infection appeared in 1909; nevertheless, its epidemiology is poorly understood to date. In the 1950s, reports on PCP epidemics in malnourished infants in hospitals and orphanages aroused suspicion of interhuman transmission. In addition, animal studies have demonstrated airborne transmission of Pneumocystis (2). A case-control study conducted for a cluster of 5 PCP cases in transplant recipients suggested transmission of P. jirovecii from AIDS patients to other immunosuppressed persons (3). However, molecular typing methods for P. jirovecii were lacking so that patient-to-patient transmission could not be assessed at the molecular level. When such techniques were developed in the 1990s, 3 analyses showed different P. jirovecii genotypes within clusters (46). A recent analysis at the molecular level of a cluster of 10 PCP cases strongly suggested that HIV-infected persons with active PCP transmitted P. jirovecii to renal transplant recipients (7). The role of interhuman transmission of P. jirovecii in the epidemiology of PCP is still unclear.

The Outbreak

Having observed no occurrence of PCP in our pediatric renal transplant unit for the last 20 years and only 1 case in all German pediatric renal transplant units during the last 10 years, we encountered 3 consecutive incidents of PCP during a 5-month period. The first patient was a 13-year-old girl, who had received her second renal graft because of cystic kidney disease; PCP developed 4 months after transplantation. The second patient, a 14-year-old boy, fell ill in the ninth posttransplant month; he had bilateral vesicoureteral reflux as underlying renal disease. The third patient was a 13-year-old girl, who had a transplant 2 years before contracting PCP because of cystic renal dysplasia occurring in the context of Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

All 3 children had been given cyclosporine A (average dose 6.7 mg/kg/day), mycophenolate mofetil (1,060 mg/m2/day), and methylprednisolone (3.2 mg/m2/day), as maintenance immunosuppression. One patient had also received induction therapy with the interleukin-2-receptor-antibody basiliximab. All 3 children had been treated with methylprednisolone pulses for acute rejection episodes 2, 3, and 15 months before PCP was diagnosed.

Clinically, all patients showed nonspecific symptoms, such as mild fever, dyspnea, and dry cough in the absence of auscultatoric anomalies. Laboratory tests showed an elevation of lactic dehydrogenase activity, C-reactive protein concentration in blood, and pronounced hypercalcemia (2.7–3.5 mmol/L), which was interpreted as an extrarenal production of 1.25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by activated alveolar macrophages. We found a significant reduction of S-adenosylmethionine concentration in plasma (6 nmol/L; normal range 86–128 nmol/L), which appears to be specific to PCP, unlike bacterial or other atypical pneumonias (8). We measured the blood count of CD4+ and CD4/DR+T lymphocytes in the third patient to indicate the degree of immunosuppression, since antirejection therapy had been administered 15 months before the occurrence of PCP. The number of CD4+T cells was normal at the time of PCP diagnosis (1,100 cells/μL; normal range 505–1,151 cells/μL), while the number of activated T-helper cells was slightly decreased (24 CD4/DR+cells/μL; normal range 29–87/μL). Only in the course of PCP did the numbers of CD4+ and CD4/DR+T lymphocytes drop significantly (308 CD4+T cells/μL and 8 CD4/DR+cells/μL). Chest radiographs and thorax computed tomographic scans of the 3 children showed typical signs of interstitial pneumonia, e.g., ground-glass opacity.

Diagnosis of PCP was confirmed by the presence of cysts and vegetative forms in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, proved by immunofluorescence staining, and through detection of Pneumocystis DNA by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In spite of intensive antimicrobial therapy, 2 of our 3 renal transplant patients died, at 10 and 28 days, respectively, after the onset of PCP.


Thumbnail of Course of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in 3 pediatric renal transplant recipients and 1 infant suffering from a yet-unclassified mitochondriopathy. R, acute rejection episode; RTx, renal transplantation; ↓, contact; #, ,joint holiday; >, start of PCP symptoms; ▬, hospitalization; X, diagnosis of PCP; D, death.

Figure. . Course of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in 3 pediatric renal transplant recipients and 1 infant suffering from a yet-unclassified mitochondriopathy. R, acute rejection episode; RTx, renal transplantation; ↓, contact; #, ,joint...

To determine if PCP could have been caused by patient-to-patient transmission, we closely examined the course of PCP in the infected children (Figure). Patient 1 stayed on the same ward and same floor, but not in the same room (distance between the rooms' doors ≈10 m), as an infant with a yet-unclassified mitochondriopathy and pneumonia, which later was diagnosed as PCP. Patient 2's hospital stay overlapped that of patient 1; the patients were on the same ward and same floor, in rooms with doors separated by 8 m, before the onset of PCP. Patient 3 spent her holiday with patient 2 in a summer camp organized by our Pediatric Nephrology Division.

Proceeding on the assumption that PCP in the 4 children resulted from patient-to-patient transmission, we investigated the genotypes of P. jirovecii with the multitarget single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) method. This typing procedure is based on the amplification by PCR of 4 variable regions of the genome, followed by the detection of polymorphisms by means of SSCP. These 4 genomic regions are as follows: internal transcribed spacer number 1 of the nuclear rRNA genes operon (ITS1), the intron of the nuclear 26S rRNA gene (26S), the variable region of the mitochondrial 26S rRNA gene (mt26S), and the region surrounding intron number 6 of the β-tubulin gene (β-tub). Typing procedures were carried out as described elsewhere (9). A variable region amplified from a bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimen can generate either 2 bands (simple pattern) or >2 bands (complex pattern). While a simple pattern corresponds to a single allele of the genomic region, the presence of >2 bands (complex pattern) indicates the existence of several alleles for a given region, most probably attributable to coinfection with multiple P. jirovecii types (10).

Our analysis showed that all 3 renal transplant patients had acquired the same 2 strains of Pneumocystis, types 1 and 2. The infant with mitochondriopathy had been infected with >2 strains, which possibly included types 1 and 2 (Table). In contrast, 3 unrelated cases in patients (patients 4, 5, and 6) from the same hospital harbored other P. jirovecii types. The index of discrimination of the method was high (0.93) (10), and the probability that patients 1, 2, and 3 were infected with the same strains by chance is extremely low. We observed that the proportion of coinfecting strains within the clinical specimen was more important than the amount of template DNA to detect or not detect a strain by means of the SSCP typing method. A coinfecting strain has to represent 11% of the population to be detected (11). Coinfecting strains are missed when very low amounts of template DNA are used, sometimes resulting in a negative PCR; however, this was not the case for the specimens analyzed in the present study.

The index patient had more strains than the other patients (Table) but generated smaller amounts of PCR products with the 4 different PCR tests used, which suggests a lower amount of DNA template. Although excluding a common source of P. jirovecii is difficult, the results strongly suggest that all 3 kidney transplant recipients had infected each other, and the infant could have acted as index patient. This transmission may have occurred directly from 1 patient to another but also indirectly through immunocompetent carriers. Indeed, carriage of P. jirovecii DNA in the nose of immunocompetent relatives and healthcare workers in close contact with a PCP patient has been described (12).


To our knowledge, this report is the first published on an outbreak of PCP in a pediatric renal transplant unit, probably attributable to patient-to-patient transmission. However, we cannot exclude that the cases described were infected by the same environmental source. The presence of P. jirovecii in the air of hospital corridors has been described (13), making an environmental reservoir in the hospital possible. Other potential sources of P. jirovecii could be asymptomatic P. jirovecii carriers, such as immunosuppressed patients (14,15). Our findings at the molecular level suggest that P. jirovecii may be transmitted nosocomially and be acquired by immunosuppressed pediatric transplant recipients. The incubation periods of P. jirovecii infection (17, 15, and 19 weeks for patients 1, 2, and 3, respectively) would be longer than those (2–12 weeks) suggested by the previously described clusters of PCP (3,7,16). This finding may reflect a difference between adults and children.

Until the outbreak of PCP outlined in this article, pediatric renal transplant recipients in our hospital and other pediatric renal transplant units in Germany were not given PCP prophylaxis routinely because of possible side effects, such as a rise of serum creatinine values, myelosuppression, and Lyell syndrome. We had not observed any case of PCP in our transplant recipients for the last 20 years without prophylaxis. In the light of the high death rate for PCP, prophylactic treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is highly recommended for the first 6 posttransplant months and during the 4 months after antirejection therapy, in accordance with the guidelines for adults (1). According to these guidelines, patient 3, in whom PCP developed 15 months after steroid pulse therapy, would not have been protected by prophylaxis. Whether prophylaxis should be given for a longer period of time remains unknown, particularly since immunosuppression did not appear to be intensive in this patient at the onset of PCP, as indicated by the normal CD4+ T-lymphocyte count in peripheral blood and the only slightly decreased number of activated T-helper cells.

Dr. Höcker is a physician and research fellow at the University Children's Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Her research activities are focused on immunosuppressive therapy and diagnosis and treatment of opportunistic infections in pediatric renal transplant recipients.



  1. EBPG Expert Group on Renal Transplantation. European best practice guidelines for renal transplantation. Section IV: long-term management of the transplant recipient. IV.7.1 Late infections. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(Suppl 4):368. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hughes  WT. Current issues in the epidemiology, transmission, and reactivation of Pneumocystis carinii. Semin Respir Infect. 1998;13:2838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chave  JP, David  S, Wauters  JP, Van Melle  G, Francioli  P. Transmission of Pneumocystis carinii from AIDS patients to other immunosuppressed patients: a cluster of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. AIDS. 1991;5:92732. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Olsson  M, Eriksson  BM, Elvin  K, Strandberg  M, Wahlgren  M. Genotypes of clustered cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Scand J Infect Dis. 2001;33:2859. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Latouche  S, Poirot  JL, Maury  E, Bertrand  V, Roux  P. Pneumocystis carinii hominis sequencing to study hypothetical person-to-person transmission. AIDS. 1997;11:549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Helweg-Larsen  J, Tsolaki  AG, Miller  RF, Lundgren  B, Wakefield  AE. Clusters of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: analysis of person-to-person transmission by genotyping. QJM. 1998;91:81320. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rabodonirina  A, Vanhems  P, Couray-Targe  S, Gillibert  RP, Ganne  C, Nizard  N, Molecular evidence of interhuman transmission of Pneumocystis pneumonia among renal transplant recipients hospitalized with HIV-infected patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:176673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Skelly  M, Hoffman  J, Fabbri  M, Holzman  RS, Clarkson  AB Jr, Merali  S. S–adenosylmethionine concentrations in diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Lancet. 2003;361:12678. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hauser  PM, Francioli  P, Bille  J, Telenti  A, Blanc  DS. Typing of Pneumocystis carinii f. sp. hominis by single-strand conformation polymorphism of four genomic regions. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:308691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hauser  PM, Blanc  DS, Sudre  P, Senggen Manoloff  E, Nahimana  A, Bille  J, Genetic diversity of Pneumocystis carinii in HIV-positive and -negative patients as revealed by PCR-SSCP typing. AIDS. 2001;15:4616. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nahimana  A, Blanc  DS, Francioli  P, Bille  J, Hauser  PM. Typing of Pneumocystis carinii f.sp. hominis by PCR-SSCP to indicate high frequency of co-infections. J Med Microbiol. 2000;49:7538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vargas  SL, Ponce  CA, Gigliotti  F, Ulloa  AV, Prieto  S, Munoz  MP, Transmission of Pneumocystis carinii DNA from a patient with P. carinii pneumonia to immunocompetent contact health care workers. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:15368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bartlett  MS, Vermund  SH, Jacobs  R, Durant  PJ, Shaw  MM, Smith  JW, Detection of Pneumocystis carinii DNA in air samples: likely environmental risk to susceptible persons. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:25113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hauser  PM, Blanc  DS, Bille  J, Nahimana  A, Francioli  P. Carriage of Pneumocystis carinii by immunosuppressed patients and molecular typing of the organisms. AIDS. 2000;14:4613. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vargas  SL, Ponce  CA, Sanchez  CA, Ulloa  AV, Bustamante  R, Juarez  G. Pregnancy and asymptomatic carriage of Pneumocystis jirovecii. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:6056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goesch  TR, Gotz  G, Stellbrinck  KH, Albrecht  H, Weh  HJ, Hossfeld  DK. Possible transfer of Pneumocystis carinii between immunodeficient patients. Lancet. 1990;336:627. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1102.040820

Table of Contents – Volume 11, Number 2—February 2005

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Britta Höcker, University Children’s Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 150, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; fax: 49-6221-564203

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: April 17, 2012
Page updated: April 17, 2012
Page reviewed: April 17, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.