Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 12—December 2006

Distinct Transmission Cycles of Leishmania tropica in 2 Adjacent Foci, Northern Israel

Milena Svobodova*, Jan Votypka*, Jitka Peckova*, Vít Dvorak*, Abedelmajeed Nasereddin†, Gad Baneth†, Julia Sztern†, Vasiliy Kravchenko†, Amnon Orr‡, David Meir§, Lionel F. Schnur†, Petr Volf*, and Alon Warburg†Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; †The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; ‡Tiberias Veterinary Center, Tiberias, Israel; §Nature and National Parks Protection Authority, Jerusalem, Israel

Cite This Article


Transmission of Leishmania tropica was studied in 2 adjacent foci in Israel where vector populations differ. Only Phlebotomus sergenti was found infected with L. tropica in the southern focus; P. arabicus was the main vector in the northern focus. Rock hyraxes (Procavia capensis) were incriminated as reservoir hosts in both foci. L. tropica strains from the northern focus isolated from sand flies, cutaneous leishmaniasis cases, and rock hyraxes were antigenically similar to L. major, and strains from the southern focus were typically L. tropica. Laboratory studies showed that P. arabicus is a competent vector of L. tropica, and P. sergenti is essentially refractory to L. tropica from the northern focus. Susceptibility of P. arabicus may be mediated by O glycoproteins on the luminal surface of its midgut. The 2 foci differ with respect to parasites and vectors, but increasing peridomestic rock hyrax populations are probably responsible for emergence of cutaneous leishmaniasis in both foci.

Leishmaniases are parasitic diseases with a wide range of clinical symptoms and currently threaten 350 million persons in 88 countries (1). In Israel and its vicinity, Leishmania major and L. tropica cause cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), and L. infantum can result in visceral leishmaniasis (2). Until recently, relatively little information was available on the epidemiology of CL caused by L. tropica in this region. Outbreaks were not investigated, and cases were usually grouped together with CL cases caused by L. major (3). However, in recent years, new foci of CL caused by L. tropica are emerging in different parts of the country, such as the Galilee region of northern Israel and the Judean Desert east of Jerusalem that warrant thorough investigations (4,5). Clinically, lesions caused by L. tropica last longer and are more difficult to treat than those caused by L. major (6). Although L. tropica can be anthroponotic, foci in Israel appear to be zoonotic, with rock hyraxes (Procavia capensis) serving as probable reservoir hosts (4).

Leishmania development in sand flies is facilitated by interaction with midgut molecules of the vector. Laboratory studies showed that sand flies are composed of 2 groups. Species such as Phlebotomus (Phlebotomus) papatasi, the vector of L. major and P. (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti, the main vector of L. tropica, show specificity for Leishmania they transmit in nature (7,8). Conversely, species such as Lutzomyia longipalpis, the vector of L. infantum in South America, and many others are permissive and support development of several Leishmania spp (8,9).

Studies performed with L. major and P. papatasi showed that attachment in the midgut is mediated by the major surface glycoconjugate of promastigotes, lipophosphoglycan (LPG), which interacts with PpGalec, a galactose-binding molecule in the midgut of P. papatasi (10). However, the mechanism of attachment may be redundant, and another molecule on the promastigote flagellum may be involved (11).

Recently, the susceptibility of phlebotomine sand flies to Leishmania parasites was shown to correlate with O-linked glycoproteins in sand fly midgut (P. Volf, unpub. data). The permissive species have O-glycosylated epitopes on the luminal midgut surface, which may serve as binding sites for lectinlike components found on the surface of parasites (12,13). We compare midgut glycosylation patterns of 2 sand fly species, P. (Adlerius) arabicus and P. (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti that transmit L. tropica in 2 adjacent foci in the Galilee region of northern Israel.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Leishmania tropica foci near Lake Kinneret in the Galilee region of Israel. Inset shows the location of the foci. W. Bank, West Bank.

Figure 1. Leishmania tropica foci near Lake Kinneret in the Galilee region of Israel. Inset shows the location of the foci. W. Bank, West Bank.

L. tropica is genetically heterogeneous, and strains are readily distinguishable by antigenic, biochemical, and molecular techniques (1416). We report findings of extensive studies in 2 adjacent CL foci that demonstrate conclusively that both vector species and parasite strains from the northern focus are different from those in the southern focus, a mere 10 km away (Figure 1).

Materials and Methods

Study Area

Studies were conducted in 2 adjacent foci in the Galilee region of northern Israel (Figure 1). The northern focus comprises several villages situated on generally south-facing slopes ≈5 km north of Lake Kinneret in the eastern lower Galilee of northern Israel (32°55´N, 35°36´W). The area investigated encompasses the villages of Amnun (at sea level), Karkom (100–150 m above sea level), and Korazim (150 m above sea level), which have ≈1,200 inhabitants living in ≈300 single-family houses surrounded by gardens and built on basalt rock. Many boulders from the cleared land have been piled into large heaps separating individual plots and surrounding the villages. These boulder mounds are inhabited by numerous rock hyraxes (P. capensis).

The southern focus includes the city of Tiberias (32°47´N, 35°32´W; population = 38,952). Studies were conducted in the outskirts of urban neighborhoods, where boulder mounds were inhabited by large populations of rock hyraxes. These neighborhoods are built on north- to northeast-facing slopes.

Collection, Dissection, and Identification of Sand Flies

Sand flies were trapped by using CDC light traps (John W. Hock, Gainesville, FL, USA) in September 2002 and 2004. Dead flies were stored in 70% alcohol and identified by using several keys (1719). Live female flies were immobilized on ice, rinsed briefly in 96% ethanol, and dissected in 0.9% sterile saline. Guts were microscopically examined for parasites. Heads and genitalia were used for identification. Guts containing promastigotes were aseptically placed in glass vials (2.5 mL) containing blood agar made from defibrinated rabbit blood overlaid with a 1:1 mixture of RPMI 1640 medium and Schneider Drosophila cell culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA, and Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), 10,000 IU penicillin (Biotika, L'upca, Slovakia), 100 μg/mL amikacin (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA), and 1,500 μg/mL 5-fluorocytosine (Sigma). Some data on Leishmania isolates from the northern focus were obtained from our previously published results.

Collection of Animals

Rock hyraxes were trapped by using raccoon traps ( baited with fresh leaves and anesthetized with ketamine (10 mg/kg given intramuscularly). Samples of blood and skin were obtained for parasite culture and blotted onto filter paper for PCR analysis. Animals were released at the site of capture. Skin biopsy specimens were homogenized and placed in blood agar culture medium in flat tubes (Nunclon; Nunc Nalgene International, Rochester, NY, USA). Rats (Rattus rattus) were trapped by using steel mesh traps (Tomahawk Live Trap Co., Tomahawk, WI, USA) placed in sewers and rock crevices. Spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) were captured by using Sherman traps (H.B. Sherman Traps, Tallahassee, FL, USA). Rodents were anaesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (150 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg, respectively, given intraperitoneally). Blood from the tip of the tail was blotted on filter paper. Ear biopsy specimens were treated as described for hyraxes. Cultures were checked at 4–7-day intervals for 1 month.

DNA Extraction

DNA from wild-caught sand flies kept frozen or preserved in 100% ethanol was extracted as previously described (20). DNA from filter paper disks was extracted by using the phenol-chloroform method (21).

Detection and Identification of Leishmania infections by PCR

The ribosomal internal transcribed spacer region 1 (ITS1) was amplified with Leishmania-specific primers. ITS1 PCR products showing a Leishmania-specific band on agarose gels were digested with HaeIII for species identification (22). Restriction fragments were subjected to electrophoresis on agarose gels and compared with DNA of L. infantum (Li-L699), L. major (Lm-L777), and L. tropica (Lt-L590).

Antigenic Characterization of Parasite Isolates

Initial screening of isolates was performed by using gel diffusion of glycoconjugates secreted into culture media (excreted factor) and several antileishmanial serum samples (23). Leishmania-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were used in indirect immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) assays to determine surface antigenic characteristics of parasites (14). Briefly, promastigotes from primary cultures of new isolates and controls of L. infantum (Li-L699), L. major (Lm-L777), and L. tropica (Lt-L590) were placed in wells of fluorescent antibody slides (Bellco Glass Inc., Vineland, NJ, USA), dried, and fixed in cold acetone. Slides were blocked with 5% fetal bovine serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 hour at room temperature. Mouse MAbs specific for L. major (T1), L. tropica (T11, T14, and T15), L. tropica/L. major (T3), and L. infantum/L. donovani (D2) were applied for 1 hour at 37°C. Goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate was applied for 40 minutes at 37°C in the dark. The preparations were washed 3 times with PBS plus 5% Tween 20 between incubations. Slides were mounted in 3% DABCO (Sigma) in PBS/glycerol and viewed with an Axiovert microscope (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).

Experimental Infection of Sand Flies

Laboratory colonies of P. sergenti and P. arabicus were established from gravid females caught in the northern focus. The colonies were maintained at 23°C–25°C, 100% humidity, and 14:10 light:dark photoperiod. Adults had access to cotton wool soaked in 50% honey. Females were allowed to feed twice a week on mice anaesthetized with a ketamine/xylazine mixture (150 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg). Fed females were placed in plaster of paris–lined oviposition containers, and larvae were maintained on a decaying rabbit feces/rabbit chow mixture (24). Sand flies were infected by membrane feeding on heat-inactivated rabbit blood containing 5×105 promastigotes/mL. Fed females were maintained at 23°C and dissected on day 9 after feeding, when infections were mature. Guts were checked microscopically for Leishmania promastigotes. Infection intensity was scored as light (<50 promastigotes/gut), moderate (50–500 promastigotes/gut), and heavy (>500 promastigotes/gut). L. tropica strains from the northern (IARA/IL/2001/L810, Amnunfly1) and southern (MHOM/IL/2001/L-836, Tiberias) foci were used for comparing susceptibility of sand flies to local strains. Promastigotes from the same culture and sand flies from the same batch were used in individual experiments. For every combination, the experiment was repeated twice. Statistical tests were performed by using Statgraphics version 4.2 software (StatPoint, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA).

Glycosylation of Sand Fly Midguts

Midguts were dissected from 5- to 10-day-old P. sergenti and P. arabicus females. Midgut proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 10% gels under reducing conditions in a Mini-Protean III apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at 200 V. Gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 or transferred to nitrocellulose membranes by using a Semiphor unit (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, CA, USA). Western blotting was performed for 90 minutes at 1.5 mA/cm2. Membranes were incubated with 20 mmol/L Tris, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.05% Tween (TBS-Tw) with 5% bovine serum albumin for 2 hours and then with Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA) biotinylated lectin, which recognizes N-acetyl-d-galactosamine (GalNAc), a typical carbohydrate in O-glycans. In the control groups, HPA reactions were competitively inhibited by preincubation with 250 mmol/L GalNAc for 30 minutes. After repeated washing in TBS-Tw, blots were incubated for 1 hour with streptavidin peroxidase in TBS-Tw. The peroxidase reaction was developed with the substrate 4-chloro-1-naphthol. All chemicals for lectin blotting were obtained from Sigma.

Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis

Twenty wild-caught sand flies morphologically identified as P. sergenti, 10 from the northern focus and 10 from the southern focus, were included in the analysis. Two flies from Tulek, Turkey, were included as an outgroup. DNA from thoraxes was extracted by using the High Pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche, Paris, France). Five decamer random primers (OPD5, OPE4, OPI1, OPI14, and OPI18; Operon Technologies Inc, Alameda, CA, USA) were used. The reaction mixture contained 12.5 μL master mixture (75 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 20 mmol/L (NH4)2SO4, 0.001% Tween 20, 800 μM deoxynucleotide triphosphate mixture), 2.5 U Taq polymerase, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 2 μL primer (10 pmol), and 8 μL double-distilled water in a final volume of 25 μL. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) reactions were performed in a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and subjected to 45 amplification cycles. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel in Tris-acetate EDTA buffer at 80 V for 3 hours and stained with ethidium bromide.

ITS2 Sequencing

DNA samples for RAPD analysis were used for ITS2 sequencing. One specimen from each study area was included as previously described (25).


Sand Fly Species

A total of 1,491 sand flies (7 species, 4 subgenera) from the northern focus and 876 sand flies (7 species, 4 subgenera) from the southern focus were identified. Phlebotomine fauna in the southern focus were relatively species poor with P. (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti comprising >90% of the flies. The most striking difference in the species composition between the foci was the absence of P. (Adlerius) arabicus and P. (Adlerius) simici from the southern focus, both of which were prominent species in the south-facing slopes of the northern focus (Table 1) (26).

Leishmania Infections in Sand Flies

To detect infections and obtain parasite isolates, sand fly females were dissected in sterile saline and guts were examined microscopically. Four (6.6%) of 61 P. arabicus and 1 (0.8%) of 125 P. sergenti from the northern focus had promastigotes in their guts. Infection intensity in P. sergenti from the northern focus was low, but all P. arabicus had heavy, mature infections. A total of 213 flies from the southern focus were dissected; 196 were P. sergenti, and 19 (9.7%) had promastigotes. Eleven of these females had heavy infections, and 8 had moderate-to-light infections. All infected females were caught at 1 sublocality in the southern focus, where the local infection rate was 19.6%. Promastigote cultures were established from 4 P. arabicus and 1 P. sergenti captured in the northern focus and from 18 P. sergenti females captured in the southern focus (Table 2). None of the other sand fly species were infected.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of A) PCR of Leishmania internal transcribed spacer region 1 (ITS1) of naturally infected Phlebotomus sergenti sand flies and cultured Leishmania spp. controls. B) HaeIII digestion of restriction fragment length polymorphisms of ITS1 PCR products shown in A. Lane 1, P. sergenti female 1; lane 2, P. sergenti female 2; lane 3, P. sergenti female 3; lane 4, L. tropica (Lt-L590); lane 5, L. major (Lm-L777); lane 6, L. infantum (Li-L699).

Figure 2. A) PCR of Leishmania internal transcribed spacer region 1 (ITS1) of naturally infected Phlebotomus sergenti sand flies and cultured Leishmania spp. controls. B) HaeIII digestion of restriction fragment length polymorphisms of...

Sand flies that were not dissected fresh were kept frozen and were subjected to ITS1 PCR for detection of Leishmania. Nine (18%) of 50 P. sergenti females from the southern focus were positive for Leishmania ribosomal DNA. HaeIII digestion of the ITS1 PCR products confirmed that all P. sergenti had L. tropica (Figure 2).

Identification of Infections in Mammals

Figure 3

Thumbnail of A) PCR of Leishmania internal transcribed spacer region 1 (ITS1) of cultured Leishmania promastigotes isolated from rock hyrax. B) HaeIII digestion of restriction fragment length polymorphisms of ITS1 PCR products shown in A. Lane MW, molecular mass marker; lane 1, L. infantum (Li-L699); lane 2, L. major (Lm-L777); lane 3, L. tropica (Lt-L590); lane 4, rock hyrax.

Figure 3. A) PCR of Leishmania internal transcribed spacer region 1 (ITS1) of cultured Leishmania promastigotes isolated from rock hyrax. B) HaeIII digestion of restriction fragment length polymorphisms of ITS1 PCR products shown...

Rodents collected in the northern focus were tested for L. tropica infection by ITS1 PCR. Dried blood and skin samples from 28 rats (R. rattus) and 46 spiny mice (A. cahirinus) were negative for Leishmania DNA. Eight of 73 rock hyraxes from the northern focus and 6 of 46 rock hyraxes from the southern focus were positive for L. tropica DNA by ITS-1 amplification and reverse-line blotting using sequence-specific probes (data not shown). Of the positive animals, 11 were adults (9 females and 2 males) and 1 was a juvenile male. Parasites from 1 rock hyrax captured in the northern focus were cultured and identified by ITS1 PCR and digestion with HaeIII (Figure 3).

Antigenic Characterization of Leishmania Isolates

IFA assays with species-specific MAbs were used to characterize different isolates. L. tropica isolates from the northern focus were antigenically distinct from all other isolates, including those from the southern focus (Table 3).

Susceptibility of P. arabicus and P. sergenti to L. tropica

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Artificial infection of laboratory-reared Phlebotomus arabicus and P. sergenti with Leishmania tropica isolates from 2 foci in Galilee, Israel. Note the high susceptibility of P. arabicus for both strains and refractoriness of P. sergenti for the northern strain. Nf, northern focus; Sf, southern focus.

Figure 4. Artificial infection of laboratory-reared Phlebotomus arabicus and P. sergenti with Leishmania tropica isolates from 2 foci in Galilee, Israel. Note the high susceptibility of P. arabicus for both strains and refractoriness...

In laboratory experiments, L. tropica parasites from the northern focus infected only P. arabicus, and parasites from the southern focus infected both P. arabicus and P. sergenti. Susceptibility of P. arabicus for infection with L. tropica strains from both northern and southern foci was high (94% and 97%, respectively). In contrast, P. sergenti was not permissive for L. tropica strains from the northern focus (1 of 64 flies). Susceptibility of P. sergenti for infection with L. tropica from the southern focus strain was lower (66%) than that of P. arabicus (Figure 4).

Glycosylation of Luminal Midgut Proteins

Figure 5

Thumbnail of Left, female sand fly midgut lysates separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Blots were incubated with biotinylated Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA) that detects O-glycosylated proteins. Lane 1, molecular mass markers; lanes 2 and 3, Phlebotomus sergenti; lanes 4 and 5, P. arabicus; +, preincubation of lectin with 250 mmol/L N-acetyl-d-galactosamine; –, no preincubation. Right, reaction of fluorescein-conjugated

Figure 5. Left, female sand fly midgut lysates separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. Blots were incubated with biotinylated Helix pomatia agglutinin (HPA) that detects O-glycosylated proteins....

Incubation of P. sergenti midgut lysates with HPA showed no reaction, indicating a lack of O-glycosylated proteins (Figure 5). In contrast, an abundant glycoprotein (37–43 kDa) was strongly labeled by HPA in P. arabicus midgut lysates. Controls of P. arabicus midgut lysates incubated with HPA blocked by preincubation with GalNAc showed no reaction, which confirmed the specificity of the lectin reactions in experimental blots (Figure 5). Labeling of midguts with fluorescein-conjugated HPA confirmed the presence of GalNAc-containing glycoproteins in the midguts of P. arabicus. Intensity of labeling in P. sergenti midguts was weaker, which reflected a nonspecific background reaction (Figure 5).

Comparison of P. sergenti Populations by RAPD and ITS2 Sequencing

Figure 6

Thumbnail of Random amplified polymorphic DNA PCR banding patterns of Phlebotomus sergenti from 2 foci in Galilee, Israel. The PCR was performed with primer OPI 1. Lane MW, molecular mass marker; lane 2, P. sergenti from Turkey. Shown are 4 flies from the northern focus (Nf) and 4 flies from the southern focus (Sf).

Figure 6. Random amplified polymorphic DNA PCR banding patterns of Phlebotomus sergenti from 2 foci in Galilee, Israel. The PCR was performed with primer OPI 1. Lane MW, molecular mass marker; lane 2,...

Flies from both foci shared the same banding pattern and differed from Turkish P. sergenti (Figure 6). ITS 2 sequences of P. sergenti from both foci were identical with each other and nearly identical (99%) with the ITS 2 sequence of a P. sergenti specimen from the West Bank (GenBank accession no. AF462325) (data not shown).


We have identified 2 emerging foci of CL in which rock hyraxes serve as reservoir hosts of the causative agent L. tropica. Despite their geographic proximity, the 2 foci show fundamental differences with regard to transmission cycles. Parasites and vector species in the southern focus are typical of most Asian zoonotic L. tropica foci, but the northern focus is characterized by antigenically distinct parasites that are transmitted by a newly incriminated sand fly vector.

L. tropica is widely distributed in eastern and northern Africa, the Middle East, and large parts of Asia. A recent study using 21 microsatellite loci showed that L. tropica is a genetically heterogeneous species composed of >80 genotypes. The genetic makeup of this complex suggests a probable African origin, with isolates from the northern focus more related to African isolates than to other strains from the Middle East (16).

The major surface molecule of Leishmania promastigotes is LPG, which has been shown to mediate attachment of parasites to the midgut of the sand fly (8). LPG of L. tropica from the northern focus is characterized by abundant terminal β-galactose residues on side chains. Conversely, β-galactose residues on LPG side chains of other L. tropica isolates are mostly capped with glucose (27). Differences in sugar moieties may have a role in infection of P. sergenti (Figure 4). Although β-galactose residues are present in L. major LPG, strains of L. tropica from the northern focus were not infective to P. papatasi, the natural vector of L. major (M. Svobodova, unpub. data) (4).

P. sergenti is probably a species complex, and its component populations show several molecular and morphologic differences (25). RAPD-PCR is a powerful tool for estimating genetic variability and was successfully used to compare genetic variation within and between 5 sympatric Phlebotomus species in Spain (28). Using the same primer sets, we did not find any differences between P. sergenti flies from the 2 foci (Figure 6). We deduce that populations from both foci are probably freely interbreeding.

P. sergenti is of Palaearctic origin; flies migrated into North Africa during the Miocene era (29). Thus, L. tropica and P. sergenti apparently originated in different continents and their geographic overlap probably arose at a later time. P. sergenti, P. (Larroussius) guggisbergi, P. (Paraphlebotomus) saevus, and perhaps P. arabicus are vectors in Africa (30,31). Since L. tropica variants from both foci develop in P. arabicus, but only the variant from the southern focus completes development in P. sergenti, we postulate that L. tropica was initially transmitted by P. arabicus or another permissive vector such as P. (Adlerius) halepensis (9). The more common transmission cycle is a later adaptation to P. sergenti, a dominant, widely distributed phlebotomine species.

Refractoriness of P. sergenti to variants of L. tropica from the northern focus is probably due to the lack of HPA-binding proteins on the luminal surface of midgut epithelium. HPA-binding epitopes are present in permissive vectors such as P. arabicus (Figure 4), P. halepensis (P. Volf, unpub. data), and Lu. longipalpis (32). These findings support infections with multiple species of Leishmania (9,33).

The absence of P. arabicus from the north-facing slopes of the southern foci contrasts dramatically with its predominance in the south-facing slopes of the northern focus. Although a satisfactory explanation for this fact is lacking, such phenomena are not unusual. For example, species richness of insects was much higher in the drier and warmer south-facing slopes of a narrow canyon (100–400 m wide) in Mount Carmel, Israel, than in the north-facing slope of the same canyon (34). P. arabicus is widely distributed in Africa and the Arabian peninsula (17), and the Galilee focus forms the northern limit of its distribution. Since P. arabicus originates in warmer regions, finding it in warmer, drier, south-facing slopes and not in cooler, shadier north-facing slopes of the hills in Galilee is not surprising (Table 1).

Rock hyraxes in both foci were found infected with L. tropica, and 1 isolate was obtained from an adult male in the northern focus. Although rock hyraxes were suspected reservoir hosts of L. tropica in Africa (35,36) and have been previously implicated in the northern focus (4), this is the first report of a rock hyrax isolate that was identified as L. tropica and shown to be identical to those obtained from humans and sand flies in the same focus (Table 3).

Figure 7

Thumbnail of Rock hyrax (Procavia capensis). Sand flies are attracted to these animals and prefer feeding on their snouts.

Figure 7. Rock hyrax (Procavia capensis). Sand flies are attracted to these animals and prefer feeding on their snouts.

Rock hyrax populations in many parts of Israel are expanding rapidly and encroaching upon human habitation. They were extremely common in both foci studied, as well as in other L. tropica foci in the region (D. Meir and A. Warburg, unpub. data [4,5], ). In the Galilee foci, rock hyraxes inhabit crevices within boulder mounds that were created when land was cleared for the construction of houses. These artificial caves also afford suitable breeding sites for sand flies. Rock hyraxes are susceptible to L. tropica, and infected rock hyraxes are infective to feeding P. arabicus and P. sergenti. Sand flies are attracted to rock hyraxes and prefer feeding on their snouts (Figure 7) (37). This behavior makes them suitable as vectors because L. tropica is usually found in the skin above the nose (R.W. Ashford, unpub. data). Furthermore, as gregarious diurnal mammals, sleeping rock hyraxes are a readily available blood source for night-questing phlebotomine females. Lastly, rock hyraxes live for 9–10 years in the wild (38) and constitute an efficient parasite reservoir for infecting sand flies that emerge in the spring after their winter diapause (39). These facts indicate that that burgeoning, peridomestic rock hyrax populations are the primary cause of the emergence of CL caused by L. tropica in the region studied (39,40).

Dr Svobodova is a research scientist in the Department of Parasitology at Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. Her research interests include the biology of Leishmania and other trypanosomatids, with an emphasis on their interaction with insect vectors.



We thank R.W. Ashford for many stimulating discussions and assistance with parasite isolation from hyraxes.

This research was supported by grant no. SO 220/5-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): The Palestinian-Israeli-German Cooperative project on Leishmaniasis in Israel and The West Bank, the Israeli Ministry for the Environment grant no. 802-2, the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (206/02/P107), and the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic (project 0021620828).



  1. Desjeux  P. The increase in risk factors for leishmaniasis worldwide. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:23943. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jaffe  CL, Baneth  G, Abdeen  ZA, Schlein  Y, Warburg  A. Leishmaniasis in Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Trends Parasitol. 2004;20:32832. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anis  E, Leventhal  A, Elkana  Y, Wilamowski  A, Pener  H. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Israel in the era of changing environment. Public Health Rev. 2001;29:3747.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jacobson  RL, Eisenberger  CL, Svobodova  M, Baneth  G, Sztern  J, Carvalho  J, Outbreak of cutaneous leishmaniasis in northern Israel. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:106573. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schnur  LF, Nasereddin  A, Eisenberger  CL, Jaffe  CL, El Fari  M, Azmi  K, Multifarious characterization of Leishmania tropica from a Judean desert focus, exposing intraspecific diversity and incriminating Phlebotomus sergenti as its vector. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70:36472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Klaus  S, Frankenburg  S. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in the Middle East. Clin Dermatol. 1999;17:13741. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kamhawi  S, Modi  GB, Pimenta  PF, Rowton  E, Sacks  DL. The vectorial competence of Phlebotomus sergenti is specific for Leishmania tropica and is controlled by species-specific, lipophosphoglycan-mediated midgut attachment. Parasitology. 2000;121:2533. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pimenta  PF, Saraiva  EM, Rowton  E, Modi  GB, Garraway  LA, Beverley  SM, Evidence that the vectorial competence of phlebotomine sand flies for different species of Leishmania is controlled by structural polymorphisms in the surface lipophosphoglycan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:91556. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sadlova  J, Hajmova  M, Volf  P. Phlebotomus (Adlerius) halepensis vector competence for Leishmania major and Le. tropica. Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17:24450. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamhawi  S, Ramalho-Ortigao  M, Pham  VM, Kumar  S, Lawyer  PG, Turco  SJ, A role for insect galectins in parasite survival. Cell. 2004;119:32941. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Warburg  A, Tesh  RB, McMahon-Pratt  D. Studies on the attachment of Leishmania flagella to sand fly midgut epithelium. J Protozool. 1989;36:6137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hernandez  AG, Rodriguez  N, Stojanovic  D, Candelle  D. The localization of a lectin-like component on the Leishmania cell surface. Mol Biol Rep. 1986;11:14953. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Svobodova  M, Bates  PA, Volf  P. Detection of lectin activity in Leishmania promastigotes and amastigotes. Acta Trop. 1997;68:2335. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaffe  CL, McMahon-Pratt  D. Monoclonal antibodies specific for Leishmania tropica. I. Characterization of antigens associated with stage- and species-specific determinants. J Immunol. 1983;131:198793.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schonian  G, Schnur  L, el Fari  M, Oskam  L, Kolesnikov  AA, Sokolowska-Kohler  W, Genetic heterogeneity in the species Leishmania tropica revealed by different PCR-based methods. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95:21724. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwenkenbecher  JM, Wirth  T, Schnur  LF, Jaffe  CL, Schallig  H, Al-Jawabreh  A, Microsatellite analysis reveals genetic structure of Leishmania tropica. Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:23746. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Artemiev  M. Revision of the sandflies of the subgenus Adlerius (Diptera Phlebotominae, Phlebotomus). Zool Zh. 1980;59:117793.
  18. Lewis  D. A taxonomic review of the genus Phlebotomus (Diptera: Psychodidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Entomology. 1982;45:121209.
  19. Lewis  D, Buttiker  W. Insects of Saudi Arabia: the taxonomy and distribution of Saudi Arabian Phlebotomus sandflies (Diptera:Psychodidae). Fauna of Saudi Arabia. 1982;4:35383.
  20. Aransay  AM, Scoulica  E, Tselentis  Y. Detection and identification of Leishmania DNA within naturally infected sand flies by seminested PCR on minicircle kinetoplastic DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:19338. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schonian  G, Nasereddin  A, Dinse  N, Schweynoch  C, Schallig  HD, Presber  W, PCR diagnosis and characterization of Leishmania in local and imported clinical samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;47:34958. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. El Tai  NO, El Fari  M, Mauricio  I, Miles  MA, Oskam  L, El Safi  SH, Leishmania donovani: intraspecific polymorphisms of Sudanese isolates revealed by PCR-based analyses and DNA sequencing. Exp Parasitol. 2001;97:3544. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Schnur  LF, Zuckerman  A. Leishmanial excreted factor (EF) serotypes in Sudan, Kenya and Ethiopia. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1977;71:27394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Modi  GB, Tesh  RB. A simple technique for mass rearing Lutzomyia longipalpis and Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the laboratory. J Med Entomol. 1983;20:5689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Depaquit  J, Ferte  H, Leger  N, Lefranc  F, Alves-Pires  C, Hanafi  H, ITS 2 sequences heterogeneity in Phlebotomus sergenti and Phlebotomus similis (Diptera, Psychodidae): possible consequences in their ability to transmit Leishmania tropica. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:112331. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kravchenko  V, Wasserberg  G, Warburg  A. Bionomics of phlebotomine sandflies in the Galilee focus of cutaneous leishmaniasis in northern Israel. Med Vet Entomol. 2004;18:41828. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Soares  RP, Barron  T, McCoy-Simandle  K, Svobodova  M, Warburg  A, Turco  SJ. Leishmania tropica: intraspecific polymorphisms in lipophosphoglycan correlate with transmission by different Phlebotomus species. Exp Parasitol. 2004;107:10514. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin-Sanchez  J, Gramiccia  M, Pesson  B, Morillas-Marquez  F. Genetic polymorphism in sympatric species of the genus Phlebotomus, with special reference to Phlebotomus perniciosus and Phlebotomus longicuspis (Diptera, Phlebotomidae). Parasite. 2000;7:24754.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Depaquit  J, Ferte  H, Leger  N, Killick-Kendrick  R, Rioux  JA, Killick-Kendrick  M, Molecular systematics of the phlebotomine sandflies of the subgenus Paraphlebotomus (Diptera, Psychodidae, Phlebotomus) based on ITS2 rDNA sequences. Hypotheses of dispersion and speciation. Insect Mol Biol. 2000;9:293300. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gebre-Michael  T, Balkew  M, Ali  A, Ludovisi  A, Gramiccia  M. The isolation of Leishmania tropica and L. aethiopica from Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) species (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the Awash Valley, northeastern Ethiopia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004;98:6470. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawyer  PG, Mebrahtu  YB, Ngumbi  PM, Mwanyumba  P, Mbugua  J, Kiilu  G, Phlebotomus guggisbergi (Diptera: Psychodidae), a vector of Leishmania tropica in Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1991;44:2908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Evangelista  LG, Leite  AC. Histochemical localization of N-acetyl-galactosamine in the midgut Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae). J Med Entomol. 2002;39:4329. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Walters  LL. Leishmania differentiation in natural and unnatural sand fly hosts. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1993;40:196206. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pavlicek  T, Vivanti  S, Fishelson  F, Nevo  E. Biodiversity and microsite divergence of insects at "Evolution Canyon," Nahal Oren, Mt. Carmel, Israel. II. Orthoptera: Acrididae. Journal of the Entomologic Research Society. 2002;4:2539.
  35. Grove  SS. Leishmaniasis in South West Africa/Namibia to date. S Afr Med J. 1989;75:2902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sang  DK, Njeru  WK, Ashford  RW. A possible animal reservoir for Leishmania tropica s.l. in Kenya. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1992;86:3112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Svobodova  M, Volf  P, Votypka  J. Experimental transmission of Leishmania tropica to hyraxes (Procavia capensis) by the bite of Phlebotomus arabicus. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:16914. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Fourie  PB. The life-span of mammals: estimates for the dassie (Procavia capensis). J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1978;49:1435.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ashford  RW. Leishmaniasis reservoirs and their significance in control. Clin Dermatol. 1996;14:52332. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ashford  RW. The leishmaniases as emerging and reemerging zoonoses. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:126981. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1212.060497

Table of Contents – Volume 12, Number 12—December 2006

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Alon Warburg, Department of Parasitology, The Kuvin Center for the Study of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel; email:

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: October 04, 2011
Page updated: October 04, 2011
Page reviewed: October 04, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.