Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 5—May 2006
Dispatch

The Trojan Chicken Study, Minnesota

Sandra R. Olson*†Comments to Author  and Gregory C. Gray*
Author affiliations: *University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA; †University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

Main Article

Figure

A) UV light box for screening hands for evidence of contamination with fluorescent dye; B) example of fluorescence on contaminated hands; C) stacked poultry in cages at a county fair; D) poultry judge moved from cage to cage, handling each bird and passing bird to exhibitor.

Figure. A) UV light box for screening hands for evidence of contamination with fluorescent dye; B) example of fluorescence on contaminated hands; C) stacked poultry in cages at a county fair; D) poultry judge moved from cage to cage, handling each bird and passing bird to exhibitor.

Main Article

Page created: January 12, 2012
Page updated: January 12, 2012
Page reviewed: January 12, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external