Volume 12, Number 6—June 2006
Research
Social Behavior and Meningococcal Carriage in British Teenagers
Table 3
Single variable analysis of risk factors for meningococcal carriage in British teenagers at school level*
Variable | No. schools | % positive† | OR (95% CI) | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
School type | ||||
Comprehensive | 47 | 13.1 | 1.00, reference | |
Independent/grammar | 9 | 12.0 | 0.90 (0.60–1.35) | |
Sixth form college | 9 | 19.6 | 1.71 (1.18–2.48) | |
Further education college | 9 | 19.1 | 1.66 (1.14–2.42) | 0.002 |
Funding | ||||
State | 68 | 14.6 | 1.00, reference | |
Independent | 6 | 13.8 | 0.94 (0.57–1.56) | 0.808 |
Sex | 10.5 | |||
Single sex | 5 | 14.8 | 1.00, reference | |
Coeducational | 69 | 14.7 | 1.52 (0.87–2.64) | 0.139 |
School size | ||||
Small (<200 pupils) | 11 | 13.5 | 1.00, reference | |
Medium (200–499) | 47 | 12.8 | 0.98 (0.68–1.41) | |
Large (>500) | 16 | 20.2 | 1.78 (1.18–2.69) | <0.001 |
Boarding | ||||
No | 71 | 14.6 | 1.00, reference | |
Yes | 3 | 13.1 | 0.79 (0.39–1.61) | 0.512 |
Center | ||||
Cardiff | 9 | 14.2 | 1.00, reference | |
Glasgow | 22 | 11.7 | 0.75 (0.54–1.03) | |
Bangor | 6 | 19.4 | 1.47 (0.99–2.20) | |
Nottingham | 9 | 18.0 | 1.36 (0.94–1.95) | |
Oxford | 11 | 20.8 | 1.63 (1.16–2.29) | |
Plymouth | 14 | 7.9 | 0.52 (0.36–0.75) | |
Stockport | 3 | 23.5 | 1.92 (1.22–3.03) | <0.001 |
*OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
†This is calculated as the average of the percentages positive across the schools.
1United Kingdom Meningococcal Carriage Group: S. Ahmed, D.A.A. Ala'aldeen, N. Andrews, R.A. Barnes, D.N. Baxter, J.C. Cameron, K. Cann, A.D. Carr, D. Casey, M. Clacher, S.C. Clarke, D.W. Crook, R. Cunningham, K.T. Dunkin, M.R. Evans, S. Gray, D. Griffiths, S. Harrison, E.B. Kaczmarski, G. Kafatos, J.S. Kroll, Y.K. Lau, G. Lewendon, C. Lewis, J.M. MacLennan, M.C.J. Maiden, P. Marks, R. Mathews, J. Murray, K. Neal, A. Paull, M.E. Ramsay, C. Roberts, J.M. Stuart, D. Turner, R. Urwin, A.M. Walker, S. Welch.