Volume 13, Number 10—October 2007
THEME ISSUE
Global Poverty and Human Development
Research
Dengue Fever Seroprevalence and Risk Factors, Texas–Mexico Border, 2004
Table 4
Variable | Adjusted odds ratio | p value | 95% Confidence interval | Deff |
---|---|---|---|---|
Income <$100 | 3.22 | 0.012 | 1.31–7.95 | 0.95 |
Missing income | 1.35 | 0.671 | 0.34–5.42 | 1.00 |
Street drainage | 0.69 | 0.395 | 0.29–1.65 | 1.00 |
Larval habitat | 2.20 | 0.381 | 0.37–13.07 | 0.74 |
Air-conditioning | 0.74 | 0.543 | 0.28–1.96 | 0.94 |
Intact screens | 0.98 | 0.959 | 0.41–2.32 | 1.06 |
Store water | 1.17 | 0.709 | 0.51–2.68 | 0.90 |
Aedes aegypti | 1.05 | 0.912 | 0.47–2.31 | 0.92 |
Cross border, 3 mo | 0.95 | 0.900 | 0.40–2.24 | 1.05 |
People/household | 0.97 | 0.727 | 0.80–1.17 | 0.88 |
*Missing data in independent variables (n = 22) did not significantly change prevalence of recent or past dengue infection (p>0.10) in the remaining 578 observations used in subsequent models. Deff, design effect, the ratio of variance between the survey design and simple random sampling.
Page created: July 02, 2010
Page updated: July 02, 2010
Page reviewed: July 02, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.