Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 12—December 2007
Dispatch

Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Feral Swine near Spinach Fields and Cattle, Central California Coast1

Michele T. Jay*Comments to Author , Michael Cooley‡, Diana Carychao‡, Gerald W. Wiscomb§, Richard A. Sweitzer¶, Leta Crawford-Miksza*, Jeff A. Farrar#, David K. Lau**, Janice O’Connell*, Anne Millington#, Roderick V. Asmundson**, Edward R. Atwill, and Robert E. Mandrell‡
Author affiliations: *California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, USA; †University of California, Davis, California, USA; ‡US Department of Agriculture, Albany, California, USA; §US Department of Agriculture, Sacramento, California, USA; ¶University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA; #California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California, USA; **US Food and Drug Administration, Alameda, California, USA;

Main Article

Figure 1

Left: aerial (2 m) photograph of ranch A showing overlapping circular buffer regions around feral swine trap 1 and trap 2 (San Benito Crop Year 2006; Image Trader, Flagstaff, AZ). The radius for the buffer (1.8 km) is the circumference of the mean home range for feral swine in mainland California (8). Estimated density = 4.6 swine/km2 and total area = (A + B + C) – D = 14.8 km2. Areas A, B, and C, combined with counts of individual feral swine from October through November 2006, were used to calculate the average population density. Bottom left: digital infrared photograph of feral swine at trap 1. Right: potential risk factors for Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination of spinach at ranch A: 1) Feral sow and piglets sharing rangeland with cattle; 2) feral swine feces, tracks, and rooting in a neighboring spinach field; 3) cattle in surface water.

Figure 1. Left: aerial (2 m) photograph of ranch A showing overlapping circular buffer regions around feral swine trap 1 and trap 2 (San Benito Crop Year 2006; Image Trader, Flagstaff, AZ). The radius for the buffer (1.8 km) is the circumference of the mean home range for feral swine in mainland California (8). Estimated density = 4.6 swine/km2 and total area = (A + B + C) – D = 14.8 km2. Areas A, B, and C, combined with counts of individual feral swine from October through November 2006, were used to calculate the average population density. Bottom left: digital infrared photograph of feral swine at trap 1. Right: potential risk factors for Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination of spinach at ranch A: 1) Feral sow and piglets sharing rangeland with cattle; 2) feral swine feces, tracks, and rooting in a neighboring spinach field; 3) cattle in surface water.

Main Article

References
  1. Cornick  NA, Helgerson  AF. Transmission and infectious dose of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in swine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:5331–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Feder  I, Wallace  FM, Gray  JT, Fratamico  P, Fedorka-Cray  PJ, Pearce  RA, Isolation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from intact colon fecal samples of swine. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:380–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rice  DH, Hancock  DD, Besser  TE. Faecal culture of wild animals for Escherichia coli O157:H7. Vet Rec. 2003;152:82–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sargeant  JM, Hafer  DJ, Gillespie  JR, Oberst  RD, Flood  SJ. Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in white-tailed deer sharing rangeland with cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999;215:792–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wahlstrom  H, Tysen  E, Olsson-Engvall  E, Brandstrom  B, Eriksson  E, Morner  T, Survey of Campylobacter species, VTEC O157 and Salmonella species in Swedish wildlife. Vet Rec. 2003;153:74–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ongoing multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 infections associated with consumption of fresh spinach—United States, September 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:1045–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. California Department of Health Services and US Food and Drug Administration. Investigation of an Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreak associated with Dole pre-packaged spinach. 2007;1–50 [cited 2007 Apr 17]. Available from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/fdb/html/food/envinvrpt.htm
  8. Sweitzer  RA, Gardner  IA, van Vuren  D, Boyce  WM, Waithman  JD. Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the north and central coast regions of California. J Wildl Manage. 2000;64:531–43. DOIGoogle Scholar
  9. Himathongkham  S, Dodd  ML, Yee  JK, Lau  DK, Bryant  RG, Badoiu  AS, Optimal enrichment conditions and recirculating immunomagnetic separation (RIMS) for enhanced detection and recovery of low levels of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from fresh leafy produce and surface water. J Food Prot. 2007;70. In press.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooley  M, Carychao  D, Crawford-Miksza  L, Jay  MT, Myers  C, Rose  C, Incidence and tracking of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a major produce production region in California. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1159. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ribot  EM, Fair  MA, Gautom  DN, Cameron  SB, Hunter  B, Swaminathan  B, Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006;3:59–67. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyytia-Trees  E, Smole  SC, Fields  PA, Swaminathan  B, Ribot  EM. Second generation subtyping: a proposed PulseNet protocol for multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 (STEC O157). Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006;3:118–31. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Keys  C, Kemper  S, Keim  P. Highly diverse variable number tandem repeat loci in the E. coli O157:H7 and O55:H7 genomes for high-resolution molecular typing. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98:928–40. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Atwill  ER, Sweitzer  RA, Pereira  MG, Gardner  IA, van Vuren  D, Boyce  WM. Prevalence of and associated risk factors for shedding Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and Giardia cysts within feral pig populations in California. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:3946–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Waithman  JD, Sweitzer  RA, Van Vuren  D, Drew  JD, Brinkhaus  AJ, Gardner  IA, Range expansion, population sizes, and management of wild pigs in California. J Wildl Manage. 1999;63:298–308. DOIGoogle Scholar

Main Article

1This work was presented in part as a poster at the 107th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, May 24, 2007.

Page created: July 06, 2010
Page updated: July 06, 2010
Page reviewed: July 06, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external