Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 12—December 2007

Diphyllobothrium latum Outbreak from Marinated Raw Perch, Lake Geneva, Switzerland

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Diphyllobothrium latum, a fish tapeworm, has a complex cycle including copepods and freshwater fish as intermediate hosts. Humans are infected by eating raw or undercooked fish meat. Clinical consequences of human infection are generally absent or mild, although anemia due to vitamin B12 deficiency was described in Scandinavia (1). Freshwater fish host the parasite in some lakes of Switzerland, Italy, Scandinavia, northeastern Canada, and South America (14). Lake Geneva, in Switzerland, harbors perch, pike, and char, which are considered to be food delicacies and may act as secondary intermediate hosts. Perch are heavily infested (5,6). To date, D. latum has reportedly caused only sporadic cases in western Europe. One outbreak has previously been described in South Korea after 5 persons ate raw redlip mullet. Identification of the Diphyllobothrium species in that outbreak was uncertain (7).

Since 2001, medical centers in the lake region have reported an increasing number of human cases. We report, to our knowledge, the first outbreak of D. latum infections in this region, which occurred after a wedding party in June 2006. The menu included raw, marinated perch fillets caught the same day in Lake Geneva. After D. latum infection was diagnosed in 2 guests, all those who attended (n = 32) were contacted within 4 months after the wedding. Information was collected with a standardized questionnaire on personal characteristics; past infection with D. latum; consumption of raw perch during the wedding, raw freshwater fish in the last 5 years, or both; and symptoms or visible proglottids in stools. All participants who ate the raw perch dish during the wedding had a stool sample examined for ova and proglottids at the Laboratory of Parasitology of the Geneva University Hospitals. Species identification relied on egg and proglottid morphologic characteristics and epidemiologic factors.

A confirmed case-patient was defined as a case in a guest who ate raw perch at the wedding and had characteristic eggs or proglottids in stool. A probable case-patient was defined as a person who ate raw perch during the wedding and reported a “tagliatelle-like” worm of varying length in stools, without a history of consumption of raw beef, pork, or other raw fish in the previous 5 years and in the absence of laboratory examination of stool sample. All confirmed case-patients received a single 10-mg/kg dose of praziquantel. Stool examination was repeated after treatment.

Twenty-six wedding guests ate raw marinated perch. Seven confirmed cases and 1 probable case of D. latum infection occurred (attack rate 30.8%). Infected persons had a median age of 34 years (range 24–60 years) and were more likely to be female. Microscopic examination showed characteristic eggs in 7 patients’ stools and both eggs and proglottids in 3 patients.

None of the patients reported symptoms within 7 days after the dinner. Two patients remained asymptomatic at interview but both were reporting visible worm segments in stools. Six patients (75%) reported symptoms that started 20–91 days after the wedding (median 56 days). Reported symptoms were diarrhea (6 patients), fatigue (5), abdominal pain (4), nausea (3), loss of weight (2), vomiting (1), or dizziness (1). No patient required urgent medical care or missed work. The mean interval between the wedding and the first observation of visible proglottids in stool was 40 days. Seven patients were treated with a single 10-mg/kg dose of praziquantel with no adverse effects reported. One patient treated herself with albendazole (400 mg/day for 3 days) before she was seen at a hospital. All patients became asymptomatic and had negative stool examination results 2–10 weeks after treatment.

None of the patients reported previous or subsequent consumption of raw freshwater fish. Raw fish preparations such as sushi, sashimi, carpaccio, and ceviche are increasingly popular and are now also prepared with local freshwater fish. These new food habits represent a clear risk factor for human infection (5,7).

The plerocercoid larvae in the fish muscles are easily missed during food preparation. Nor are local fish systematically inspected, as imported fish are. The role of paratenic hosts (e.g., dogs, foxes) in transmission is not fully understood.

Information given to the public and professionals such as food handlers, restaurant owners, and fishermen is a key measure to promote safer food practices. Avoiding serving preparations of raw freshwater fish or selecting fish that are not intermediate hosts of D. latum would decrease parasite transmission. Cooking the fish at 55°C for 5 minutes efficiently kills the larvae. Freezing the fish at −20°C for 24 hours is also efficient. International regulations recommend freezing all fish that are expected to be served raw. Notable exceptions are fish from farm culture or from areas where strong evidence proves no source or cases of infection (European community rules 853/2004 annexe III, available from However, enforcing these rules proves very difficult for food safety administrations.



We are grateful to O. Zali for providing the legal information and to G. Dändliker for sharing information about fish in Lake Geneva.


Yves Jackson*Comments to Author , Roberta Pastore†‡, Philippe Sudre†, Louis Loutan*, and François Chappuis*
Author affiliations: *Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; †General Directorate of Health, Geneva, Switzerland; ‡European Programme of Intervention Epidemiology Training, Solna, Sweden;



  1. Strickland  TG. Tapeworm infections. In: Hunter’s tropical medicine and emerging infectious diseases, 8th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2000. p. 851–6.
  2. Dupouy-Camet  J, Peduzzi  R. Current situation of human diphyllobothriasis in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2004;9:315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dick  TA, Nelson  PA, Choudhury  A. Diphyllobothriasis: update on human cases, foci, patterns and sources of human infections and future considerations. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2001;32(Suppl 2):5976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sampaio  JL, de Andrade  VP, Lucas Mda  C, Fung  L, Gagliardi  SM, Santos  SR, Diphyllobothriasis, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1598600.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacob  AC, Jacob  SS, Jacob  S. Fecal fettucine: a silent epidemic? Am J Med. 2006;119:2846. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nicoulaud  J, Year  H, Dupouy-Camet  J. Prevalence of infection by Diphyllobothrium latum, L., 1758 among perches (Perca fluvialitis) from the Leman Lake. Parasite. 2005;12:3624.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chung  PR, Sohn  WM, Jung  Y, Pai  SH, Nam  MS. Five human cases of Diphyllobothrium latum infection through eating raw flesh of redlip mullet, Liza haematocheila. Korean J Parasitol. 1997;35:2839. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1312.071034

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 13, Number 12—December 2007

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Yves Jackson, Travel and Migration Medicine Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Micheli-du-Crest 24, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 06, 2010
Page updated: July 06, 2010
Page reviewed: July 06, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.