Volume 14, Number 10—October 2008
Research
Deforestation and Vectorial Capacity of Anopheles gambiae Giles Mosquitoes in Malaria Transmission, Kenya
Table 1
Site | Land use type | Mean ± SD indoor temperature, °C | Mean ± SD indoor relative humidity, % | No. membrane feedings | No. feedings resulting in infection | Total no. mosquitoes dissected | Range of infection rates,† % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Highland | Forested | 20.89 ± 0.39a | 75.9 ± 1.8a | 34 | 27 | 3,171 | 10.0–42.8 |
Highland | Deforested | 22.13 ± 0.27b | 60.6 ± 2.1b | 34 | 29 | 3,719 | 10.2–40.6 |
Lowland | Deforested | 23.90 ± 0.40c | 64.7 ± 2.1b | 21 | 19 | 1,749 | 11.0–42.4 |
*Superscript letters after values indicate results of Tukey-type multiple comparison tests. Values with the same superscript letter in the same column were not statistically significant (p = 0.05).
†Infection rate refers to proportion of dissected mosquitoes that were infected with P. falciparum oocysts or sporozoites.
Page created: July 13, 2010
Page updated: July 13, 2010
Page reviewed: July 13, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.