Volume 14, Number 10—October 2008
Research
Prophylaxis after Exposure to Coxiella burnetii
Table 1
Variable | Primary analysis (sensitivity analysis) | Sensitivity analyses |
References | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Less virulent | More virulent | |||
Exposure | (0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00) | NA | NA | NA |
Efficacy of doxycycline PEP (8–12 d postexposure) | 0.82 (0.82–0.965) | 0.965 | 0.40 | (22,23) |
Efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole PEP (8–12 d postexposure) | 0.82 (0.40–0.965) | 0.965 | 0.40 | (21,24,25) |
Asymptomatic infection w/o PEP (all groups) | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.40 | (1,3,5,7,8,26) |
Full recovery after acute (gp) | 0.74 | Residual (0.934) | Residual (0.576) | (7–9) |
Full recovery after acute illness (hr) | 0.28 | Residual (0.739) | Residual (0.076) | (7–9) |
Full recovery after acute illness (pw) | 0.08 | Residual (0.57) | Residual (0.02) | (7–9) |
Probability of hospitalization and recovery given acute illness (gp) | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.05 | (5,7,27) |
Probability of hospitalization and recovery given acute illness (hr) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | (5,7) |
Probability of hospitalization and recovery given acute illness (pw) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | (5,7) |
Q fever fatigue syndrome (gp) | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.30 | (1,10,16,28–30) |
Q fever fatigue syndrome (hr) | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.20 | (1,10,16,28–30) |
Q fever fatigue syndrome (pw) | 0.03 | Residual (0.03) | Residual (0.04) | (1,10,16,17,28–30) |
Death from acute illness (gp) | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.024 | (7,9–11) |
Death from acute illness (hr and pw) | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.024 | (7,9–11) |
Chronic disease (gp) | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.05 | (8,11,12,26,31) |
Chronic disease (hr) | 0.39 | 0.20 | 0.65 | (13,14,31) |
Chronic disease (pw) | 0.86 | 0.39 | 0.90 | (17) |
Endocarditis (all groups) | 0.65 | 0.60 | 0.90 | (1,7,8) |
Death from endocarditis (all groups) | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.60 | (1,3,7,8,11,15,32) |
Death from other chronic diseases (all groups) | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.60 | (9) |
Abortion or neonatal death | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.56 | (8,14 ,17,21) |
Premature birth/low birth weight baby | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.28 | (8,14,17,21) |
Healthy, unaffected baby | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.16 | (8,14,17,21) |
*PEP, postexposure prophylaxis; NA, not applicable; gp, general population; hr, high-risk; pw, pregnant women. See online Appendix Table 1 for a detailed explanation of how the primary input values were selected.
References
- Health Protection Agency Center for Infections. Interim guidelines for action in the event of a deliberate release: Q fever. 2005. Version 1.4, revised 2007 Jun 18 [cited 2008 Aug 1]. Available from www.hpa.org.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1195733766607?p=1192454969657
- McQuiston JH, Childs JE. Q fever in humans and animals in the United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2002;2:179–91. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kagawa FT, Wehner JH, Mohindra V. Q fever as a biological weapon. Semin Respir Infect. 2003;18:183–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- United States Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases. Medical management of biological casualities handbook. 5th ed. Frederick (MD): The Institute; 2004.
- Dupuis G, Petite J, Peter O, Vouilloz M. An important outbreak of human Q fever in a Swiss Alpine valley. Int J Epidemiol. 1987;16:282–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franz DR, Jahrling PB, Friedlander AM, McClain DJ, Hoover DL, Bryne WR, Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological warfare agents. JAMA. 1997;278:399–411. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raoult D, Tissot-Dupont H, Foucault C, Gouvernet J, Fournier PE, Bernit E, Q fever 1985–1998. Clinical and epidemiologic features of 1,383 infections. Medicine (Baltimore). 2000;79:109–23. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bossi P, Tegnell A, Baka A, van Loock F, Werner A, Hendriks J, Bichat guidelines for the clinical management of Q fever and bioterrorism-related Q fever. Euro Surveill. 2004;9:E19–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kermode M, Yong K, Hurley S, Marmion B. An economic evaluation of increased uptake in Q fever vaccination among meat and agricultural industry workers following implementation of the National Q Fever Management Program. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27:390–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fournier PE, Marrie TJ, Raoult D. Diagnosis of Q fever. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:1823–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cutler SJ, Paiba GA, Howells J, Morgan KL. Q fever—a forgotten disease? Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:717–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fenollar F, Fournier PE, Carrieri MP, Habib G, Messana T, Raoult D. Risks factors and prevention of Q fever endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:312–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maltezou HC, Raoult D. Q fever in children. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:686–91. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raoult D, Houpikian P, Tissot DH, Riss JM. rditi-Djiane J, Brouqui P. Treatment of Q fever endocarditis: comparison of 2 regimens containing doxycycline and ofloxacin or hydroxychloroquine. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:167–73. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marmion BP, Storm PA, Ayres JG, Semendric L, Mathews L, Winslow W, Long-term persistence of Coxiella burnetii after acute primary Q fever. QJM. 2005;98:7–20. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raoult D, Fenollar F, Stein A. Q fever during pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:701–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bioterrorism agents/diseases [cited 2006 Sep 9]. Available from http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/agentlist-category.asp#b
- Benenson AS, Tigertt WD. Studies on Q fever in man. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1956;69:98–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Byrne WR. Chapter 26: Q fever. In: Zajtchuk R, editor. Textbook of military medicine: medical aspects of chemical and biological warfare. Washington: US Department of the Army, Surgeon General and the Borden Institute; 1997. p. 523–37.
- Carcopino X, Raoult D, Bretelle F, Boubli L, Stein A. Managing Q fever during pregnancy: the benefits of long-term cotrimoxazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:548–55. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Haddix AC, Hillis SD, Kassler WJ. The cost effectiveness of azithromycin for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women. Sex Transm Dis. 1995;22:274–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nuovo J, Menikow J, Paliescheskey M, King J, Mowers R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of five different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995;8:7–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gomolin IH, Siami PF, Reuning-Scherer J, Haverstock DC, Heyd A. Efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin oral suspension versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole oral suspension for treatment of older women with acute urinary tract infection. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:1606–13. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- DiRienzo AG, van Der HC, Finkelstein DM, Frame P, Bozzette SA, Tashima KT. Efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of bacterial infections in a randomized prophylaxis trial of patients with advanced HIV infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2002;18:89–94. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franz DR, Jahrling PB, McClain DJ, Hoover DL, Byrne WR, Pavlin JA, Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological warfare agents. Clin Lab Med. 2001;21:435–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ayres JG, Flint N, Smith EG, Post-infection fatigue syndrome following Q fever. QJM. 1998;91:105–23. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marmion BP, Shannon M, Maddocks I, Storm P, Penttila I. Protracted debility and fatigue after acute Q fever. Lancet. 1996;347:977–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith DL, Ayres JG, Blair I, Burge PS, Carpenter MJ, Caul EO, A large Q fever outbreak in the West Midlands: clinical aspects. Respir Med. 1993;87:509–16. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raoult D, Levy PY, Dupont HT, Chicheportiche C, Tamalet C, Gastaut JA, Q fever and HIV infection. AIDS. 1993;7:81–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siegman-Igra Y, Kaufman O, Keysary A, Rzotkiewicz S, Shalit I. Q fever endocarditis in Israel and a worldwide review. Scand J Infect Dis. 1997;29:41–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fowler RA, Sanders GD, Bravata DM, Nouri B, Gastwirth JM, Peterson D, Cost-effectiveness of defending against bioterrorism: a comparison of vaccination and antibiotic prophylaxis against anthrax. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:601–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sabbaj J, Hoagland VL, Shih WJ. Multiclinic comparative study of norfloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of urinary tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;27:297–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Talan DA, Stamm WE, Hooton TM, Moran DJ, Burke T, Travani A, Comparison of ciprofloxacin (7 days) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (14 days) for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2000;283:1583–90. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kocak Z, Hatipoglu CA, Ertem G, Kinikli S, Tufan A, Irmak H, Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole induced rash and fatal hematologic disorders. J Infect. 2006;52:e49–52. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- See S, Mumford JM. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35:694–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fennelly KP, Davidow AL, Miller SL, Connell N, Ellner JJ. Airborne infection with Bacillus anthracis—from mills to mail. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:996–1001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Page created: July 13, 2010
Page updated: July 13, 2010
Page reviewed: July 13, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.