Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 9—September 2008
Perspective

Preventing and Controlling Emerging and Reemerging Transmissible Diseases in the Homeless

Author affiliations: Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France (S. Badiaga, D. Raoult, P. Brouqui); Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France (D. Raoult, P. Brouqui)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Homelessness is an increasing public health problem. Because of poor living conditions and limited access to healthcare systems, homeless persons are exposed to many communicable infections. We summarize the intervention measures reported to be efficient for the control and the prevention of common transmissible infections among homeless populations. Evidence suggests that appropriate street- or shelter-based interventions for targeted populations are the most efficient methods. Depending on the populations targeted, these interventions may include education, free condom distribution, syringe and needle prescription programs, chest radiography screening for tuberculosis, directly observed therapy for tuberculosis treatment, improvement of personal clothing and bedding hygiene, and widespread use of ivermectin for scabies and body louse infestation. Systematic vaccination against hepatitis B virus, hepatitis A virus, influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and diphtheria is strongly recommended. National public health programs specific to homeless populations are required.

Homelessness is an increasing social and public health problem worldwide. According to the United Nations, “absolute homelessness” describes the conditions of persons without physical shelter. “Relative homelessness” describes the condition of those who have a physical shelter but one that does not meet basic standards of health and safety, such as and access to safe water and sanitation, personal safety, and protection from the elements (1). An estimated 100 million persons worldwide experience either absolute or relative homelessness (2). Homelessness is associated with numerous behavioral, social, and environmental risks that expose persons to many communicable infections, which may spread among the homeless and lead to outbreaks that can become serious public health concerns (38). Epidemiologic studies of homeless populations have reported the following prevalence rates for infectious diseases: 6.2%–35% for HIV infection (6,913), 17%30% for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (9,10), 12%30% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (9,10), 1.2%–6.8% for active tuberculosis (TB) (3,4), 3.8%–56% for scabies (11,12), 7%–22% for body louse infestation (5,11,13,14), and 2%–30% for Bartonella quintana infection (5,15), which is the most common louse-borne disease in urban homeless.

The prevalence of these transmissible diseases among the homeless varies greatly according to living conditions. Homeless persons who sleep outdoors in vehicles, abandoned buildings, or other places not intended for human habitation are mainly street youth, female street sex workers, and persons with mental health problems (1). These persons are frequently injection drug users (IDUs), and they often engage in risky sexual behavior, which exposes them to both blood-borne and sexually transmitted infections such as HIV, HCV, and HBV (6,9,10). Homeless persons sleeping in shelters are mainly single men, but they also include single women, families with children, and mentally ill persons (1). The primary health concerns for this population are the overcrowded living conditions that expose them to airborne infections, especially TB (7), and the lack of personal hygiene and clothing changes that expose them to scabies, infestation with body lice, and louse-borne diseases (5). Homeless persons using single-room hotels or living with friends and family show a high prevalence of illicit drug use and risky sexual behavior that increases the risk for infections transmitted by blood and/or sex (6), and they also frequently live in overcrowded conditions that expose them to TB (7).

Homeless people face many barriers to accessing healthcare systems; these factors contribute to increasing the spread of infections (1). Implementing efficient strategies to survey and prevent the spread of communicable infections among the homeless is a public health priority. Strategies reported to be efficient for controlling or preventing communicable infections in the homeless are targeted interventions that focus on areas where homeless people are more likely to reside and are conducted with a mobile team that includes outreach workers (8,1619). In this review, which concentrates on the primary communicable infections commonly associated with homelessness, we summarize the main intervention measures reported to be efficient in controlling and preventing these infections.

Interventions for Homeless at Risk for HIV and Hepatitis

The risk for HIV infection is higher in the following populations of homeless people: those engaged in sexual behavior such as sex work, receptive anal sex, and having multiple sexual partners; those who find it more difficult to use or obtain condoms (6,10); and those who use drugs in shooting galleries or who share syringes or other drug paraphernalia (6). Controlling the spread of HIV among the homeless requires interventions targeting high-risk groups such as youth, female street sex workers, and IDUs (16,19,20). For example, an intensive intervention program targeting homeless youth achieved a significant reduction of unprotected sex acts over 12 months (p = 0.018) and drug use over 12 months (p = 0.019) among female participants as well as a strong reduction in marijuana use over 12 months (p = 0.082) in male participants (16). The program involved training shelter staff and residents in small groups, providing access to health resources, and making condoms available easily and at no cost. An intervention program targeting homeless and crack-using African American women provided them with psychoeducational information and skills training on how to reduce HIV risk and drug use; the program significantly (p = 0.03) reduced the number of unprotected sex acts among participants, compared with control participants, at 6 months after the program was started (19). In Rhode Island, a prescription program to deliver syringes to high-risk underserved and diverse populations was conducted within the context of comprehensive drug treatment. The program recruited 327 persons and found that 86% saw a physician for syringe prescription at least 1 time, 46% at least twice, and 32% >3 times; this program demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of such a program for and by its target population, and it reduced the number of injection drugrelated risky behavior traits (20).

Factors predisposing to infections with HBV and HCV are much the same as those for HIV, with HBV a greater risk with of unprotected sex and HCV a greater risk with injection drug–related behavior (9,10). Therefore, intervention measures to prevent the spread of HCV among the homeless are the same as those noted above for HIV prevention (16,19,20). As for HBV infection, some evidence suggests that HBV immunizations for the homeless are feasible and effective. A study in New Haven, Connecticut, recruited 212 IDUs at syringe-exchange sites to undergo HBV vaccination. Most (63%) were vaccine eligible, including 23% of homeless persons; of the vaccine-eligible IDUs, 77% completed 2 vaccinations and 66% completed all 3 vaccinations (21). Homeless IDUs were more likely than other IDUs to complete the vaccination schedule, probably because the vaccination program and the syringe-exchange sites are areas where the homeless tend to congregate, providing more opportunities for them to access these services. An accelerated HBV vaccination schedule should be the regime of choice for homeless people, especially those with a past history of drug use. This recommendation is supported by a study in the United Kingdom that compared completion rates for a conventional HBV vaccine schedule (immunization at 0, 1, and 6 months) conducted among homeless in 1999 with the rates for an accelerated immunization schedule (immunization at 0, 7, and 21 days) in 2000. The completion rates for the accelerated vaccination regimen were almost 7 times higher than rates for the conventional one (22). A hepatitis A (HAV) outbreak has been reported among homeless persons and IDUs in Bristol (UK), possibly transmitted parenterally (8). The same city is the site of a successful HAV vaccination program for homeless persons and drug users to control HAV outbreaks and prevent transmission to the wider population (8). In June 2000, this program immunized 136 homeless persons and IDUs and 9 members of staff in shelters, hostels, drug services, and drop-in centers. The result was a significant (p<0.001) drop in HAV cases in the Bristol population (including homeless persons) from 90 cases (January–June) to 33 (July–December) (8).

Interventions for Homeless at Risk for TB and Airborne Diseases

TB incidence is higher in homeless populations than in the general population, as reported in San Francisco (270 cases/105 persons/year vs. 39.5 cases/105 persons/year) (23). Molecular epidemiology studies, using DNA fingerprinting, demonstrated that most TB cases occurring in the homeless are primary infections (7,23). The spread of TB among the homeless is related to recent person-to-person transmission, which produces outbreaks with large clusters in which >50% of persons are infected (7). Genotyping also identified homeless shelters as major sites of transmission (7,23). For example, in Los Angeles, California, from March 1994 through May 1999, 3 homeless shelters were sites of TB transmission for 55 (70%) of 79 homeless persons. Thirty-six of these 55 persons were infected in 1 large shelter in which 595 occupants shared 3 sleeping rooms (7). Common individual risk factors for TB among homeless persons include alcohol abuse, poor nutrition, and HIV infection (4,23). Addiction to injection or inhaled drugs has also been reported as associated with TB in the homeless (4), but this association remains debated (7,23).

Interventions to control the spread of TB among homeless persons require early detection of cases and outbreaks in shelters, screening of those persons with whom the infectious person has had contact, and effective treatment of TB patients. According to a shelter-based screening program that used symptom evaluation, chest radiography, and in some cases sputum culture and tuberculin skin testing (TST), a TB infection rate of 1%–3% has been detected among sheltered homeless populations (24,25). Implementing mandatory shelter-based screening in several homeless shelters in the United States led to reduction of TB transmission among the homeless, as demonstrated by the reduction of genotype clustering in DNA fingerprinting analyses (17) (Table 1).

No consensus has been reached regarding the most effective diagnostic tools for screening for TB among the homeless. Logistically, TST is likely to be the simplest method to use because it requires only nurses and outreach workers (17). It was used successfully to identify TB infection in several intervention programs (17,24,25). However, TST lacks specificity, especially in areas where Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination is common. Spot sputum screening is also logistically easy, feasible, and efficient for identifying unsuspected TB cases in persons in shelters, and it can permit rapid detection of patients with smears that are acid-fast positive (24,25). However, 50% of TB patients’ smears are negative, and the patients may be difficult to locate after culture results are known because the homeless tend to be very mobile. Screening by chest radiography either periodically in all residents or specifically in symptomatic persons (e.g., chronic coughers) is likely to be the most cost-effective approach, as was demonstrated in a jail setting (26). This strategy detected 42 cases of TB in 9,877 homeless persons in Los Angeles (7), and 2 cases of active pulmonary TB among 221 persons during a 1-night “snapshot” shelter-based survey (see “Snapshot Interventions,” below) in Marseille, France (27).

Screening the contacts made by TB-infected homeless persons is more effective when it focuses on possible sites of transmission such as homeless shelters rather than when it investigates contacts of specific persons. By contrast, shelters and housing records are excellent sources of information for location-based investigation of contacts (7,23). The benefits for screening are clear: a 10% in increase in the number of chronically homeless persons with active TB who access treatment each year produced a 12.5% decline in future TB cases in this population after 10 years compared with the number expected without this intervention (28). The conditions for effectively treating TB in homeless persons include directly observed therapy (DOT) throughout the treatment course to ensure patient compliance and free medical care, including extended hospitalization and stays in convalescent-care institutions (3,4). Housing-based programs involving DOT have higher completion rates than programs in acute-care hospital settings.

In addition to TB, influenza, pneumococcal pneumonia, and diphtheria have been reported in the homeless (29,30). Although no reports on interventions to prevent these infections in the homeless have been published, it has been suggested that immunization against these diseases should be planned and delivered easily and at no cost to homeless people since this population is at high risk for outbreaks and severe illness (29,30).

Interventions for Scabies, Body Louse Infestations, and Louse-borne Diseases

Scabies is transmitted by person-to-person contact or by contaminated fomites (e.g., clothes, bedding). It is more prevalent in the homeless than in the general population (11). The reported prevalence of scabies varies from 3.8% in shelter-based investigations (11) to 56.5% among hospitalized homeless persons (12). Human infestations with body lice occur when clothes are not changed or washed regularly, and close body-to-body contacts in crowded environments increase person-to-person transmission of body lice (31). In sheltered homeless populations, prevalence rates of body lice vary from 7% to 22% (5,11,13,14). In very poor hygienic conditions, an infection prevalence of 80% (18) and a single infected person carrying up to 600 lice have been reported (14,18). Scabies and body lice infestation generate severe pruritus, which leads to scratching, which may result in bacterial superinfections (11). In addition, the body louse is an efficient vector for Bartonella quintana, Rickettsia prowazekii, and Borrelia recurrentis (3,5,15,32). Acinetobacter baumanii has also been isolated from lice (32).

Controlling scabies, body louse infestation, and their effects on the homeless is a challenge. Classic therapeutic measures for scabies are based on bathing, followed by application over the entire skin of topical scabicides such as permethrin, lindane, benzyl benzoate, and crotamiton (33). Treatment with 200 μg/kg ivermectin, 2 doses administered 2 weeks apart, has been reported to be as effective as a single dose of a topical scabicide (33). Treatment of all close contacts and housemates is recommended, as well as careful washing of clothing and bedding (33). The therapeutic modality recommended for body lice is frequent changing and cleaning of clothing, including underwear and socks, as well as frequent treatment of bedding with insecticides or by boiling the sheets (3,34). In Marseilles, during a 4-year study of arthropod-borne infections among homeless people, we tried to treat, immediately and systematically, all persons in shelters who had scabies or body lice through complete clothing change, application of insecticide, administration of ivermectin as recommended, and education of shelter staff to change and treat the bedding frequently (5). Despite these efforts, no significant decrease in the prevalence of scabies and body louse infestation was observed during the study (5). In this population, a reduction in the prevalence of body lice infestation was seen after 3 doses of oral ivermectin were administered at 7-day intervals, but the effect was transient and disappeared by day 45 (18). In addition, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Marseilles to evaluate the effect of a single dose of oral ivermectin on reducing the ectoparasite-based pruritus in the sheltered homeless population. This study showed that a single dose of oral ivermectin transiently reduces pruritus (S. Badiaga, unpub. data). These observations suggest that multiple repeated treatments of ectoparasite-based pruritus with ivermectin are an efficient and practical complement to classic therapeutic measures like frequent, complete changes of clothing and bedding to reduce scabies and body lice infestation in the homeless.

The most common louse-borne disease reported in the urban homeless is Bartonella quintana infection (5). B. quintana is a pathogen restricted to humans and was first described as the agent of trench fever during World War I (34). Emergence of B. quintana among the homeless was recognized in the early 1990s by simultaneous reports of B. quintana endocarditis in 3 homeless persons in France (35) and B. quintana bacteremia in 10 homeless persons in Seattle, Washington, USA (36). Subsequent epidemiologic studies showed B. quintana seroprevalence rates of 2%–11% among nonhospitalized homeless (5,14,15) and 30% in hospitalized homeless persons (15). B. quintana bacteremia rates of 5.4% in 930 nonhospitalized homeless persons (5) and 14% in 71 hospitalized homeless persons (15) have been reported from Marseilles. B. quintana DNA has been identified in 101 (14.9%) of 678 lice collected from the sheltered homeless population in Marseille (5), as well as in lice collected from homeless persons in Japan (14).

B. quintana causes trench fever, chronic bacteremia that may last up to 78 weeks, endocarditis in alcoholic persons without previous valvulopathy, and bacillary angiomatosis in HIV-infected persons (34). Chronic bacteremia may be identified by blood cultures in homeless persons seen in emergency departments, as reported in a study from Marseilles (15). The phenomenon of chronic bacteremia suggests that humans are the natural reservoir of B. quintana, as demonstrated by identification of the bacterium in erythrocytes from homeless persons with B. quintana bacteremia (37). In addition to delousing, which is the best way to prevent louse-borne diseases, antimicrobial drug therapy against bacterial agents may be important for eradicating reservoirs and preventing complications such as endocarditis in cases of B. quintana infection. A randomized, open, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated significant efficacy of doxycycline (200 mg orally once a day for 28 days) in combination with gentamycin (3 mg/kg intravenously once a day for 14 days) in homeless persons with B. quintana chronic bacteremia (38). A regimen of gentamycin for 14 days and doxycycline for 45 days is recommended for patients with endocarditis (34).

Epidemic typhus caused by R. prowazekii and relapsing fever due to Borrelia recurrentis are 2 other louse-borne diseases that tend to affect the urban homeless. Outbreaks of epidemic typhus occur when body louse infestations are more prevalent in the population, as observed in Burundi (31). To date, no outbreak of epidemic typhus or relapsing fever has been observed in the urban homeless, nor has evidence of R. prowazekii or B. recurrentis been found in lice collected from this population. Nevertheless, during a 4-year study of louse-borne diseases among sheltered homeless persons in Marseille, we detected a sporadic acute autochthonous case of epidemic typhus in a sheltered homeless person (39) and significantly higher seroprevalences of R. prowazekii antibodies (0.75% vs. 0% in blood donors, p = 0.05) and of B. recurrentis (1.61% vs. 0% of blood donors, p = 0.005) (5). In a massive outbreak of epidemic typhus observed in Burundi, doxycycline was efficient in controlling the outbreak among jail inmates, causing a decrease in the death rate from 15% to 0.5% after administration of a single dose of 200 mg (Table 2).

Snapshot Interventions

Figure

Thumbnail of An intervention in a homeless shelter in Marseilles for infectious diseases survey.

Figure. . . An intervention in a homeless shelter in Marseilles for infectious diseases survey.

Yearly snapshot interventions in shelters, performed by large multidisciplinary teams, have been reported to be efficient for controlling or preventing infections among the homeless (5,11). These investigations can reach a category of homeless who do not usually seek healthcare. In Marseilles, since 2000, a large mobile team is sent once a year to perform these snapshot interventions in order to survey louse-borne disease in the 2 shelters designated for accommodating the homeless (5). This team comprises 30–40 persons, including physicians, residents, or fellows; nurses; and outreach workers. During interventions, homeless persons who choose to participate are interviewed and physically examined. Clothes are carefully screened for body lice, and specific treatment is given when appropriate. Nurses also collect blood and other microbiologic samples for serologic tests for louse-, flea-, and tick-borne diseases, as well as hepatitis, HIV; and syphilis. Arthropods are collected and PCR-screened for pathogens such as Bartonella, the epidemic typhus rickettsia, and Borrelia recurrentis. Depending on the epidemiologic situation, other surveys such as for the prevalence of TB and other respiratory diseases can be organized (27). In such cases, a pneumologist and radiography technologists using a mobile x-ray machine are added to the intervention team. These snapshot interventions led to successively identifying a high prevalence of louse infestation, louse-borne diseases such as B. quintana infection, and skin infections among this homeless population (5,11). Snapshot interventions have also identified the risk for the homeless of acquiring other louse-borne diseases such as epidemic typhus and relapsing fever, and enabled the first isolation of A. baumanii from lice (5,32,39). This strategy of wide systematic testing of infectious diseases in this population also led to the unexpected discovery of an outbreak of acute Q fever in a homeless shelter in Marseille (40). Epidemiologic investigations of this outbreak showed that exposure to wind from an abandoned slaughterhouse, used for an annual Muslim sheep feast, was the main risk factor for developing Coxiella burnetii infection (Figure).

Conclusions

Evidence suggests that appropriate public health interventions can be effective in preventing and controlling the spread of numerous transmitted diseases among homeless persons, which is a public health concern both for the homeless and the larger population. These interventions should be tailored to the targeted populations and focused on areas where the homeless are more likely to reside. The strategies reported to be efficient include tailored education; distribution of free condoms; implementation of a syringe and needles prescription program for HIV and HCV; systematic chest radiography for TB screening in shelters and DOT for TB; improvement of personal, clothing, and bedding hygiene; use of ivermectin to treat pruritus most often caused by scabies or body louse infestation; and immunizations against HBV, HAV, influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and diphtheria. Implementation of systematic vaccination schedules to prevent communicable diseases in the homeless is a major public health priority. The success of these interventions requires the implementation of a national public health prevention program for the homeless. A yearly snapshot intervention is 1 means to achieve these objectives.

Dr Badiaga is an infectious diseases specialist in the emergency department of the University Hospital in Marseilles, France. His research interests are management of infectious and tropical diseases in emergency hospital settings and management of transmissible diseases in people in poor living conditions.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank American Journal Experts for the translation of this manuscript into English.

Top

References

  1. Hwang  SW. Homelessness and health. CMAJ. 2001;164:22933.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Burt  MR, Aron  LY. Helping America’s homeless. Washington: Urban Institute; 2001.
  3. Raoult  D, Foucault  C, Brouqui  P. Infections in the homeless. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001;1:7784. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Haddad  MB, Wilson  TW, Ijaz  K, Marks  SM, Moore  M. Tuberculosis and the homelessness in the United States, 1993-2003. JAMA. 2005;293:27626. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brouqui  P, Stein  A, Tissot Dupont  H, Gallian  P, Badiaga  S, Rolain  JM, Ectoparasitism and vector-borne diseases in 930 homeless people from Marseilles. Medicine (Baltimore). 2005;84:618. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Robertson  MJ, Clark  RA, Charlebois  ED, Tulsky  J, Long  HL, Bangsberg  DR, HIV seroprevalence among homeless and marginally housed in San Francisco. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:120717. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes  PF, Yang  Z, Pogoda  JM, Preston-Martin  S, Jones  B, Otaya  M, Foci of tuberculosis transmission in central Los Angeles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:10816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Syed  NA, Hearing  SD, Shaw  SL, Probert  CSJ, Brooklyn  TN, Caul  EO, Outbreak of hepatitis A in the injecting drug user and homeless population in Bristol: control by a targeted vaccination programme and possible parenteral transmission. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:9016. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Klinkenberg  WD, Caslyn  RJ, Morse  GA, Yonker  RD, McCudden  S, Ketema  F, Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C among homeless persons with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders. Compr Psychiatry. 2003;44:293302. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Beech  BM, Myers  L, Beech  DJ, Kernick  NS. Human immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B and C infections among homeless adolescents. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2003;14:129. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Badiaga  S, Menard  A, Tissot Dupont  H, Ravaux  I, Chouquet  D, Graveriau  C, Prevalence of skin infections in sheltered homeless. Eur J Dermatol. 2005;15:3826.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arfi  C, Dehen  L, Benassaia  E, Faure  P, Farge  D, Morel  P, Dermatologic consultation in a precarious situation: a prospective medical and social study at the Hôpital Saint-Louis in Paris [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1999;126:6826.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rydkina  EB, Roux  V, Gagua  EM, Predtechenski  AB, Tarasevitch  IV, Raoult  D. Bartonella quintana in body lice collected from homeless persons in Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:1768. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Seki  N, Sasaki  T, Sawabe  K, Sasaki  T, Matsuoka  M, Arakawa  Y, Epidemiological studies on Bartonella quintana infections among homeless people in Tokyo, Japan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2006;59:315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brouqui  P, Lascola  B, Roux  V, Raoult  D. Chronic Bartonella quintana bacteremia in homeless patients. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1849. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rotheram-Borus  MJ, Song  J, Gwadz  M, Lee  M, Van Rossem  R, Koopman  C. Reductions in HIV risk among runaway youth. Prev Sci. 2003;4:17387. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kong  PM, Tapy  J, Calixto  P, Burman  WJ, Reves  RR, Yang  Z, Skin-test screening and tuberculosis transmission among the homeless. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:12804. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Foucault  C, Ranque  S, Badiaga  S, Rovery  C, Raoult  D, Brouqui  P. Oral ivermectin in the treatment of body lice. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:4746. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wechsberg  WM, Lam  WKK, Zule  WA, Bobashev  G. Efficacy of a woman-focused intervention to reduce HIV risk and increase self-sufficiency among African American crack abusers. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:116573. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rich  JD, McKenzie  M, Macalino  GE, Taylor  LE, Sanford-Colby  S, Wolf  F, A syringe prescription program to prevent infectious disease and improve health of injection drug users. J Urban Health. 2004;81:12234. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Altice  FL, Bruce  RD, Walton  MR, Buitrago  MI. Adherence to hepatitis B vaccination at syringe exchange sites. J Urban Health. 2005;82:15161. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wright  NM, Campbell  TL, Tompkins  CN. Comparison of conventional and accelerated hepatitis B immunisation schedules for homeless drug users. Commun Dis Public Health. 2002;5:3246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Moss  AR, Hahn  JA, Tulsky  JP, Daley  CL, Small  PM, Hopewell  PC. Tuberculosis in the homeless. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:4604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kimerling  ME, Shakes  CF, Carliste  R, Lok  KH, Benjamin  WH, Dunlap  NE. Spot sputum screening: evaluation of an intervention in two homeless shelters. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3:6139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Southern  A, Premaratne  N, English  M, Balazs  J, O’Sullivan  D. Tuberculosis among homeless people in London: an effective model of screening and treatment. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999;3:10018.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones  TF, Schaffner  W. Miniature chest radiograph screening for tuberculosis in jails: a coast-effectiveness analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:7781.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Badiaga  S, Richet  H, Azas  P, Rey  F, Tissot Dupont  H, Foucault  C, Prevalence of respiratory diseases in sheltered homeless people in Marseille, France. In: Abstracts of the 16th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; Nice, France, 2006 Apr 1–4. Abstract O420. Nice (France): The Congress; 2006.
  28. Brewer  TF, Heymann  SJ, Krumplitsch  SM, Wilson  ME, Colditz  GA, Fineberg  HV. Strategies to decrease tuberculosis in US homeless populations: a computer simulation model. JAMA. 2001;286:83442. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bucher  SJ, Brickner  PW, Vincent  RL. Influenzalike illness among homeless persons. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:11623. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mercat  A, Nguyen  J, Dautzenberg  B. An outbreak of pneumococcal pneumonia at two men’s shelters. Chest. 1991;99:14751. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Raoult  D, Ndihokubwayo  JB, Tissot-dupont  H, Roux  V, Faugere  B, Abegbinni  R, Outbreak of epidemic typhus associated with trench fever in Burundi. Lancet. 1998;352:3538. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. La Scola  B, Raoult  D. Acinetobacter baumanii in human body louse. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:16713. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chosidow  O. Clinical practices. Scabies. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:171827. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Foucault  C, Brouqui  P, Raoult  D. Bartonella quintana characteristics and clinical management. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:21723. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Drancourt  M, Mainardi  JL, Brouqui  P, Vandenesch  F, Carta  A, Lehnert  F, Bartonella (Rochalimaea) quintana endocarditis in three homeless men. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:41923. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Spach  DH, Kanter  AS, Dougherty  MJ, Larson  AM, Coyle  MB, Brenner  DJ, Bartonella (Rochalimaea) quintana bacteremia in inner-city patients with chronic alcoholism. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:4248. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rolain  JM, Foucault  C, Guieu  R, La Scola  B, Brouqui  P, Raoult  D. Bartonella quintana in human erythrocytes. Lancet. 2002;360:2268. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Foucault  C, Raoult  D, Brouqui  P. Randomized open trial of gentamycin and doxycycline for of Bartonella quintana from blood in patients with chronic bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:22047. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Badiaga  S, Brouqui  P, Raoult  D. Autochthonous epidemic typhus associated Bartonella quintana bacteremia in a homeless person. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;72:6389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Brouqui  P, Badiaga  S, Raoult  D. Q fever outbreak in homeless shelter. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:12979. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1409.080204

Table of Contents – Volume 14, Number 9—September 2008

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Philippe Brouqui, Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, IFR 48, Faculté de Médecine, 27 bd Jean Moulin 13385, Marseille CEDEX 5, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 02, 2012
Page updated: October 02, 2012
Page reviewed: October 02, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external