Volume 15, Number 10—October 2009
Intrafamilial Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus1
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Langhi SA, Robinson JO, Pearson JC, Christiansen KJ, Coombs GW, Murray RJ, et al. Intrafamilial Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(10):1687-1689. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1510.081532|
|AMA||Langhi SA, Robinson JO, Pearson JC, et al. Intrafamilial Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2009;15(10):1687-1689. doi:10.3201/eid1510.081532.|
|APA||Langhi, S. A., Robinson, J. O., Pearson, J. C., Christiansen, K. J., Coombs, G. W., & Murray, R. J. (2009). Intrafamilial Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 15(10), 1687-1689. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1510.081532.|
To the Editor: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infection was first described in our region over 15 years ago (1). More recently, CA-MRSA has become a global concern and is now a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections in the United States (2). An association between severe CA-MRSA infection (e.g., necrotizing fasciitis and pneumonia) and the synergohymenotrophic exotoxin Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) has been made (3,4). Reports have documented CA-MRSA transmission among household members; however, most cases have been mild or moderate infections or asymptomatic colonization (5–7). We describe intrafamilial transmission of a PVL-containing CA-MRSA clone common in Australia (ST30-MRSA-IV) between a nurse who suffered recurrent abscesses and her husband, who died of severe pneumonia.
In July 2006, a 61-year-old previously healthy nurse (Mrs A) sought treatment for an infected seborrheic cyst of the scalp. Culture of pus yielded MRSA that was susceptible to clindamycin. She was treated with oral clindamycin. After resolution of the infection, topical MRSA decolonization therapy with 3% hexachlorophane body wash (daily), 20% cetrimide shampoo (3×/wk), and 2% mupirocin nasal ointment (3×/d) was administered for 10 days, as per our institutional protocol for MRSA-colonized healthcare workers. Subsequently, MRSA surveillance swabs from the nose, throat, and scalp obtained weekly for 10 weeks and cultured on selective MRSA chromogenic agar and in selective broth enrichment media were negative. Household members were not screened for MRSA colonization.
Six months later, in January 2007, the patient’s husband (Mr A), a 60-year-old smoker who was her only household contact, was admitted with a 1-day history of dyspnea, pleuritic chest pain, cough with sputum, fever, vomiting, and diarrhea. On admission, he was unwell, with tachycardia (pulse rate 132 bpm), hypotension (95/60 mm Hg), tachypnea (40 breaths/min), and hypoxia (oxygen saturation 93% on 15 L O2/min). A chest radiograph showed bilateral infiltrates and a right pleural effusion. He was diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia and treated with intravenous ceftriaxone and azithromycin as per local protocol. However, within 12 hours, his condition deteriorated, necessitating admission to the intensive care unit for ventilation and inotropic support. Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluid demonstrated gram-positive cocci in tetrads, and intravenous vancomycin and dicloxacillin were added to therapy. Despite aggressive supportive measures, Mr A’s condition continued to deteriorate, and he died 28 hours after admission. MRSA was subsequently cultured from blood, sputum, and BAL fluid; an autopsy was not performed.
In June 2007, Mrs A sought treatment for an abscess with cellulitis on the left thigh. The abscess was surgically drained, and cultures again yielded MRSA. She was treated with intravenous and oral clindamycin for 10 days and subsequently underwent repeat MRSA decolonization therapy; again, swabs taken 1×/wk for 10 weeks postdecolonization were negative.
Molecular typing of the MRSA isolates obtained from Mrs A at the time of her initial skin infection, Mr A’s blood culture, and Mrs A’s second skin infection was performed by using contour-clamped homogenous electric field electrophoresis (CHEF) according to a previously described method (8) (Figure). The CHEF patterns were indistinguishable and were identical to the known CHEF pattern for ST30-MRSA-IV (9). All 3 isolates contained the lukF-PV/lukS-PV genes that encode PVL and had the same antibiogram (i.e., isolates were resistant only to β-lactam antimicrobial agents).
We describe intrafamilial MRSA transmission (defined as >2 family members who live at the same postal address and who are colonized or infected with a MRSA strain having the same CHEF pattern) that resulted in a fatal outcome. The MRSA strain responsible (ST30-MRSA-IV, or Western Samoan phage pattern/Oceania strain MRSA) is a common cause of CA-MRSA infection in Australia.
Recurrent MRSA infection developed in Mrs A several months after completion of apparently successful MRSA decolonization therapy. We could not determine whether this recurrence was because of persistent MRSA colonization not detected by surveillance (e.g., perineal or gastrointestinal colonization) or whether Mrs A was successfully decolonized but Mr A’s colonization/infection resulted in recolonization and subsequent infection. Whatever the explanation, this case highlights a potential weakness in MRSA surveillance programs that rely on short-term, limited-site surveillance.
A comprehensive MRSA search-and-destroy policy in place for over 25 years has prevented MRSA from becoming endemic in our institution (10). However, the rapidly changing epidemiology of MRSA in becoming a predominantly community pathogen represents a significant challenge to the ongoing success of this policy. In response to this challenge, the Western Australian Department of Health has implemented a community-based MRSA search-and-destroy program for patients with MRSA infection caused by exotic PVL-positive clones (e.g., ST30-MRSA-IV, ST93-MRSA-IV, ST80-MRSA-IV, and ST8-MRSA-IV/USA300). This program includes treatment/decolonization therapy for the index case, screening of household members for MRSA infection/colonization, and simultaneous treatment/decolonization if MRSA is identified. Although a similar approach has proved successful in Denmark (6), whether this success can be sustainable on a larger scale remains to be seen.
We thank our patient for allowing us to discuss her case in this report.
This research was supported by the Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
- Udo EE, Pearman JW, Grubb WB. Genetic analysis of community isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western Australia. J Hosp Infect. 1993;25:97–108.
- Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, EMERGEncy ID Net Study Group. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:666–74.
- Gillet Y, Issartel B, Vanhems P, Fournet JC, Lina G, Bes M, Association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin and highly lethal necrotising pneumonia in young immunocompetent patients. Lancet. 2002;359:753–9.
- Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Rieg G, Mehdi S, Perlroth J, Bayer AS, Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1445–53.
- L’Heriteau F, Lucet JC, Scanvic A, Bouvet E. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and familial transmission. JAMA. 1999;282:1038–9.
- Urth T, Juul G, Skov R, Schonheyder HC. Spread of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST80-IV clone in a Danish community. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26:144–9.
- Huijsdens XW, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Spalburg E, Heck ME, Pluister GN, Eijkelkamp BA, Multiple cases of familial transmission of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2994–6.
- O’Brien FG, Udo EE, Grubb WB. Contour-clamped homogeneous electric field electrophoresis of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Protocols. 2006;1:3028–33.
- Coombs GW, Pearson JC, O’Brien FG, Murray RJ, Grubb WB, Christiansen KJ. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones, Western Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:241–7.
- Pearman JW, Christiansen KJ, Annear DI, Goodwin CS, Metcalf C, Donovan FP, Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in an Australian metropolitan teaching hospital complex. Med J Aust. 1985;142:103–8.
- Figure. Contour-clamped homogenous electric field electrophoresis of Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Lanes 2, 3, and 4 (Sma1 restriction): methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolated from Mrs A’s first infection, Mr A’s blood culture,...
1Results presented in part at the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases Annual Scientific Meeting, Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia, 2008 April 2–5.
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
James O. Robinson, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Wellington Street, Perth 6000, Western Australia, Australia;
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: December 07, 2010
- Page last updated: December 07, 2010
- Page last reviewed: December 07, 2010
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)