Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 12—December 2009

Transplacental Transmission of Bluetongue Virus 8 in Cattle, UK

Karin E. DarpelComments to Author , Carrie A. Batten, Eva Veronesi, Susanna Williamson, Peter Anderson, Mike Dennison, Stuart Clifford, Ciaran Smith, Lucy Philips, Cornelia Bidewell, Katarzyna Bachanek-Bankowska, Anna Sanders, Abid Bin-Tarif, Anthony J. Wilson, Simon Gubbins, Peter P.C. Mertens, Chris A. Oura, and Philip S. Mellor
Author affiliations: Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright, UK (K.E. Darpel, C.A. Batten, E. Veronesi, K. Bachanek-Bankowska, A. Sanders, A. Bin-Tarif, A.J. Wilson, S. Gubbins, P.P.C. Mertens, C.A. Oura, P.S. Mellor); Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Bury St. Edmunds, UK (S. Williamson, C. Bidewell); Animal Health Divisional Office, Bury St. Edmunds (P. Anderson, S. Clifford, C. Smith, L. Philips); Animal Health Divisional Office, Chelmsford, UK (M. Dennison)

Cite This Article


To determine whether transplacental transmission could explain overwintering of bluetongue virus in the United Kingdom, we studied calves born to dams naturally infected during pregnancy in 2007–08. Approximately 33% were infected transplacentally; some had compromised health. In all infected calves, viral load decreased after birth; no evidence of persistent infection was found.

Bluetongue virus (BTV) is generally transmitted between ruminant hosts by Culicoides biting midges, and infection may result in the disease called bluetongue. In 2006, a strain of BTV-8 caused the first outbreak of bluetongue in northern Europe (1). Although adult Culicoides midges are absent from this region during winter for long enough to interrupt normal transmission, BTV-8 survived the winters of 2006–07 and 2007–08.

Several mechanisms have been suggested to explain the overwintering of BTV, one of which is transplacental transmission (2). Tissue-attenuated strains of BTV are sometimes capable of crossing the placenta and infecting fetuses in utero (3), and transplacental infection has been reported from the field after use of live attenuated vaccines (4). However, many wild-type strains of BTV failed to cross the placental barrier when cows were infected during pregnancy (5). Additionally, although a few studies have reported experimental transplacental infection with wild-type strains, these studies did not recover infectious virus from live offspring (although many field strains do not grow in tissue culture) and suggested that fetal infection often resulted in deformation, stillbirth, or abortion (6,7). Collectively, this information led to the assumption that only viruses passaged in tissue culture had the potential to overwinter by transplacental transmission (8). However, in 2008, nonlethal transplacental transmission of BTV-8 was detected in Northern Ireland (9). To examine the occurrence, rate, and consequences of transplacental BTV-8 transmission in the United Kingdom, we studied calves born to dams naturally infected with BTV-8 during pregnancy.

The Study

After obtaining owners’ permission, we sampled calves born to previously infected dams during the vector-free period of December 20, 2007 to March 15, 2008. Farmers were also asked to report any births, abortions, or stillbirths from BTV-infected dams outside the vector-free period. Blood samples from live calves were taken as soon as possible after birth (usually within 4 days) and tested by using a real-time reverse transcription–PCR (rRT-PCR) (10) and the Pourquier c-ELISA kit (IDEXX, Chalfont St. Peter, UK). When possible, information about the health of the calf was obtained, dams were sampled alongside their calves, and placenta samples were collected. Calves with positive BTV RNA results were resampled at 2–3 week intervals. In total, 61 calves were tested and 21 (including 1 set of twins) had detectable levels of BTV RNA in their blood or organs (Appendix Table). The transplacental transmission rate was 33% (95% confidence interval 22%–47%).

All calves except calf 21 and calf X, each of which had not consumed colostrum before sampling, had antibodies against BTV. Calf 21 was also negative for BTV RNA, but calf X showed the highest viral load in the blood (Appendix Table). Virus isolation in KC cells (11) was attempted for all calf blood samples with a cycle threshold (Ct) <29, but virus was isolated from calf X only. Viral RNA load in all calves tested declined over time, and almost all calves were rRT-PCR negative by the end of the study (Table).

When the calves were first sampled, 52 dams were also tested. The RNA load in the calves always exceeded that of their dams, and 7 of the 20 dams giving birth to BTV-positive calves had no detectable viremia.

Of the 21 BTV RNA–positive calves, 5 had compromised health. Calves Y, X, and 33 were born weak and died within hours, days, and weeks after birth, respectively, and calves 13 and 29 exhibited dummy calf syndrome (12). All calves except calf 33 were examined postmortem and had negative PCRs for bovine viral diarrhea virus (S.W., pers. comm.). Although calf X died of colisepticemia, this illness probably resulted from the calf’s weakness and inability to consume colostrum. No infectious cause for the early postnatal death of calf Y, other than bluetongue, was identified; pathologic findings for calves 13 and 29 are described elsewhere (S.W. et al., unpub. data). Calf 27, which had negative BTV test results, was born with hypermobility of the fetlock joints, unilateral carpal valgus, and arthrogryposis. All other calves were reported to be healthy.


Thumbnail of Estimated gestation period at infection of the dam in relation to occurrence of transplacental transmission. Bluetongue virus (BTV) test data for the dams and birth dates of the calves were used to calculate the window of gestation when the dam could have become infected (Technical Appendix, for details). The calculated infection windows are shown in red for BTV-positive calves (transplacental infection did occur) and in blue for BTV-negative calves (transplacental infection did not

Figure. Estimated gestation period at infection of the dam in relation to occurrence of transplacental transmission. Bluetongue virus (BTV) test data for the dams and birth dates of the calves were used...

Time windows for possible in utero infection of each calf were calculated according to the BTV testing history of the dam and the birth date of the calf (Figure). These windows were used to investigate effect of stage of gestation on the probability of transplacental transmission. To account for uncertainty in the date of infection, we used Bayesian methods (Technical Appendix). The probability of transplacental transmission increased with the time of gestation during which the dam became infected (β1 0.033; 95% credibility interval 0.014–0.063).


This detailed field study, which combines data on BTV infection in cows with data on transplacentally acquired infection in their offspring, demonstrates that the BTV-8 strain circulating in northern Europe can cross the bovine placenta in a high proportion (33%) of cases and infect calves when dams are infected during pregnancy. A similar study in continental Europe suggested a rate of ≈10% (13). However, because the transmission season was longer in some of these countries, many seropositive dams could have been infected before pregnancy, leading to underestimation of the probability of transplacental infection. In our study, we tested only calves from dams infected between August and December 2007 and known to be pregnant at the time of infection. Furthermore, analysis of our data suggests that transplacental transmission is more likely when infection occurs later in gestation; indeed, most of the dams in this study would have been in the second or third gestation trimester when infected (Figure), which may have increased our estimated rate over that found in continental Europe.

Transplacental transmission is of particular concern for policy makers because it may result in the birth of immune-tolerant, persistent carriers, as has happened with bovine viral diarrhea virus (14). In our study, all BTV-positive calves other than X and Y were tested after they had received colostrum and, hence, maternal antibodies. The presence of BTV antibodies in calf Y suggests that fetal antibody formed in response to in utero infection, yet calf X had no detectable antibodies against BTV despite strongly positive rRT-PCR results. Calf X was infected late in gestation (Figure), when it should have been capable of mounting its own antibody response (15). Antibody-negative PCR-positive calves have been reported elsewhere (13). Follow-up testing is needed to assess whether such calves remain persistently infected; however, because calf X died a few days after birth, follow-up testing was not possible.

RNA declined in all retested calves (Table); most were PCR-negative by the end of the study, including dummy calf 13. Therefore, our results do not suggest that transplacental infection with BTV-8 results in subclinical, persistent carriers. Nonetheless, the finding that some calves may be born with deformaties after the virus has cleared may lead to underestimation of the economic effects of BTV; calf 27, which was born with limb deformities to a BTV positive dam, could be such a case.

Live virus has been successfully isolated from only 4 transpacentally infected calves (including calf X described in this study), all of which received either no maternal colostrum or only pooled colostrum (9,13). Further work is needed to assess whether infectious virus can be isolated from healthy transplacentally infected calves that have colostrum-derived maternal antibodies, because infectious virus needs to be present if transplacental infection is to play a major role in overwintering. In conclusion, future emerging BTV strains should be considered to have the potential for transplacental transmission until investigations show otherwise.

Dr Darpel is a veterinarian and a postdoctoral research scientist in the Vector-borne Diseases Programme at the Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright. Her current research interests include alternative transmission pathways of arboviruses and the influence of vector arthropod saliva proteins on arbovirus infections.



We are indebted to all the farmers who participated in this study for their invaluable cooperation. We also thank many colleagues at the Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright, the Animal Health divisional offices at Bury St. Edmunds and Chelmsford, and the regional laboratories of the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) at Bury St. Edmunds and Winchester for all their help and guidance. As well, we thank Simon Carpenter, Christopher Sanders, James Barber, Anthony Greenleaves, and Alan Hurst for their support and contributions to this study.

This field study, led by the Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright, in cooperation with Animal Health through their divisional offices at Bury St. Edmund and Chelmsford, and the VLA through their Regional Laboratory in Bury St. Edmunds, was made possible by special funding by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council awarded as grant BB/G529075/1 to P.S.M. Also, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs supported this study through VLA project SV3200.



  1. Office International des Épizooties. Bluetongue in Netherlands. Disease Information; 2006;19(34) [cited 2009 Oct 20]. Available from
  2. Wilson  A, Darpel  K, Mellor  PS. Where does bluetongue virus sleep in the winter? PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e210. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibbs  EPJ, Lawman  MJP, Herniman  KAJ. Preliminary observations on transplacental infection of bluetongue virus in sheep—a possible overwintering mechanism. Res Vet Sci. 1979;27:11820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Schultz  G, Delay  PD. Losses in newborn lambs associated with blue tongue vaccination of pregnant ewes. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1955;127:2246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Parsonson  IM, Thompson  LH, Walton  TE. Experimentally induced infection with bluetongue virus serotype 11 in cows. Am J Vet Res. 1994;55:152934.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Richardson  C, Taylor  WP, Terlecki  S, Gibbs  EPJ. Observations on transplacental infection with bluetongue virus in sheep. Am J Vet Res. 1985;46:191222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bwangamoi  O. Pathology of ovine foetus infection with BTV. Bull Anim Health Prod Afr. 1978;26:7897.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirkland  PD, Hawkes  RA. A comparison of laboratory and “wild” strains of bluetongue virus—is there any difference and does it matter? Vet Ital. 2004;40:44855.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Menzies  FD, McCullough  SJ, McKeown  IM, Forster  JL, Jess  S, Batten  C, Evidence for transplacental and contact transmission of bluetongue virus in cattle. Vet Rec. 2008;163:2039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shaw  AE, Monaghan  P, Alpar  HO, Anthony  S, Darpel  KE, Batten  CA, Development and validation of a real-time RT-PCR assay to detect genome bluetongue virus segment 1. J Virol Methods. 2007;145:11526. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wechsler  SJ, McHolland  LE, Tabachnick  WJ. Cell lines from Culicoides variipennis (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) support replication of bluetongue virus. J Invertebr Pathol. 1989;54:38593. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vercauteren  G, Miry  C, Vandenbussche  F, Ducatelle  R, Van der Heyden  S, Vandemeulebroucke  E, Bluetongue virus serotype 8–associated congenital hydranencephaly in calves. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2008;55:2938. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. De Clercq  K, De Leeuw  I, Verheyden  B, Vandemeulebroucke  E, Vanbinst  T, Herr  C, Transplacental infection and apparently immunotolerance induced by a wild-type bluetongue virus serotype 8 natural infection. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2008;55:3529. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fray  MD, Paton  DJ, Alenius  S. The effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on cattle reproduction in relation to disease control. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;60–61:61527. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Osburn  BI. The impact of bluetongue on reproduction. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;17:18996. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1512.090788

Table of Contents – Volume 15, Number 12—December 2009

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Karin E. Darpel, Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey GU240NF, UK

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 09, 2010
Page updated: December 09, 2010
Page reviewed: December 09, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.