Volume 15, Number 5—May 2009
Real-Time Surveillance for Respiratory Disease Outbreaks, Ontario, Canada
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||van Dijk A, Aramini J, Edge G, Moore KM. Real-Time Surveillance for Respiratory Disease Outbreaks, Ontario, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(5):799-801. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1505.081174|
|AMA||van Dijk A, Aramini J, Edge G, et al. Real-Time Surveillance for Respiratory Disease Outbreaks, Ontario, Canada. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2009;15(5):799-801. doi:10.3201/eid1505.081174.|
|APA||van Dijk, A., Aramini, J., Edge, G., & Moore, K. M. (2009). Real-Time Surveillance for Respiratory Disease Outbreaks, Ontario, Canada. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 15(5), 799-801. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1505.081174.|
To validate the utility of a chief complaint–based emergency department surveillance system, we compared it with respiratory diagnostic data and calls to Telehealth Ontario about respiratory disease. This local syndromic surveillance system accurately monitored status of respiratory diseases in the community and contributed to early detection of respiratory disease outbreaks.
The threat of emerging infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome and pandemic influenza, makes early detection of health events critical for effective control and intervention of such outbreaks. By using alternative, electronic data sources (1), real-time syndromic surveillance systems have the potential to detect outbreaks of respiratory disease before conventional diagnosis- and laboratory-based surveillance identifies them. Many of these alternative data, such as sales of over-the-counter drugs, telephone health hotlines, and emergency department (ED) triage data, already are routinely collected.
ED syndromic surveillance typically uses a patient’s chief complaint (CC) as recorded by a triage nurse. Respiratory CC data correlate strongly with discharge data (2). CC data from EDs have been successfully integrated into several surveillance systems (3,4), including the ED system in Kingston, Ontario, Canada (5,6). CC data are effective for early identification of influenza outbreaks (7,8).
In September 2004, the Queen’s University Emergency Syndromic Surveillance Teama created a real-time emergency department surveillance system (EDSS) to monitor respiratory and gastrointestinal CCs temporally and spatially. Seven hospitals from the southeastern Ontario region fed electronic CC data into the system. Routine patient data collected without identifiers include date and time of visit, demographic information, 5-digit postal code of residence, Canadian Triage Acuity Score, and CC or reason for visit. The National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) gathers data for hospital- and community-based ambulatory care, day surgery, outpatient clinics, and EDs. Records contain patient diagnosis according to International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision–Canadian Enhancement (ICD-10-CA) codes. Every hospital in Ontario submits data to NACRS, and the system includes demographic, clinical, and administrative data for the entire province (9). Telehealth Ontario is the teletriage helpline available free to all Ontario residents 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Callers are connected to skilled nurses who assess symptoms over the phone and assist callers in making the most appropriate healthcare decision (10). Each caller’s demographics are recorded, and each call is assigned a guideline after the nurse has gone through a list of questions about why the person has called.
We conducted an investigation to verify and validate the utility of a triage CC-based EDSS in southeastern Ontario as a tool for monitoring respiratory disease by comparing it retrospectively with data from NACRS and Telehealth Ontario. This study was part of a broader research project approved by the Queen’s Research Ethics Board and adheres to the principles and policies for the protection of personal health information charter.
We retrospectively studied data for July 4, 2004–March 31, 2006. Daily counts of discharges of persons with respiratory disease based on ICD-10-CA codes were obtained from the NACRS database, and counts of respiratory CCs were likewise collected from EDSS. Patient location was determined by forward sortation address (i.e., first 3 digits of postal code) and health unit code in the NACRS database and by specific reporting hospital in the EDSS data set. Weekly Telehealth Ontario counts of respiratory disease based on guidelines were also obtained. We categorized Telehealth Ontario calls into episodes of upper or lower respiratory disease on the basis of a priori classification schemes verified by other research (6,11–13). Telehealth Ontario calls were geolocated by forward sortation address. All data were compiled into weekly totals (Sunday–Saturday) from each of the 3 nonidentifiable data sets.
During July 2004–March 2006, EDSS contained 29,668 reports of respiratory diseases in persons seeking care at 1 of the 7 area hospitals. During the same period, Telehealth Ontario received 4,247 calls about upper and lower respiratory disease, and NACRS recorded 19,315 cases of respiratory disease from southeastern Ontario. Analysis comparing the EDSS respiratory CCs with the Telehealth Ontario calls about respiratory disease (Figure) resulted in a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.91, indicating good correlation. Analysis comparing the EDSS respiratory CC to all NACRS respiratory disease diagnoses resulted in a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.98, indicating very good correlation. All correlations were highly significant (p<0.0001). Correlations were highest and most significant when no time lags were included in the models.
This study verified that ED CC data can be used as a timely source of surveillance for respiratory diseases. ED CCs in southeastern Ontario strongly correlated in time with NACRS respiratory discharge diagnoses and calls to Telehealth Ontario about respiratory disease. NACRS data are unavailable to public health stakeholders in a timely enough fashion to be useful for day-to-day monitoring of respiratory disease trends in the community, whereas ED CCs are available electronically and in real time.
As expected, EDSS CCs about respiratory disease peaked during the influenza seasons (early November 2004–mid-April 2005 and early December 2005–early May 2006) (Figure); however, EDSS CCs continued to fluctuate during the influenza off season, probably because of other respiratory pathogens. The nature of the EDSS data did not allow us to separate respiratory complaints related to influenza from those related to other pathogens. Further analysis is needed to correlate CC subsets with laboratory-positive influenza cases.
One consideration for interpreting EDSS data is that the hospitals in this surveillance system include large referral hospitals that have high volumes of patients visiting from outside our health unit boundaries. Although this large referral area may result in higher counts of visits than reflected in the NACRS database, we believe it does not affect our interpretation of the data. Even though each hospital is required to submit data, it is still possible that not all records from each hospital are sent on time to NACRS.
Although the public health system has accepted syndromic surveillance as a useful tool, doubts remain about its anticipated early warning benefits (14). These potential benefits cannot be tested because no large-scale outbreaks have occurred since the inception of our real-time syndromic surveillance system. Protocols of many pandemic-preparedness plans include monitoring of real-time systems. When a pandemic occurs, syndromic surveillance may be able to help healthcare workers recognize a potential outbreak, which theoretically could help them mitigate effects on society earlier. Our study demonstrates that in southeastern Ontario, ED CCs accurately reflect respiratory conditions of patients in the area. The correlations found strongly suggest that EDSS accurately monitors respiratory disease in the community and contributes to early detection of respiratory disease outbreaks. We continue to monitor the system from day to day and have increased the number of reporting hospitals to 9. Future studies will use laboratory data to assess the value of advanced warning on a number of syndromes captured in our system.
Mr van Dijk works at the Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington Public Health Unit. He specializes in syndromic surveillance using telehealth call data, occupational health data, and emergency department chief complaints.
We thank the Queen’s Public Health Informatics team for editorial assistance. Data were provided by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and Clinidata, a division of Sykes Assistance Services Corporation.
This project was supported by a Physician Services Inc. research grant.
- Rolland E, Moore KM, Robinson VA, McGuinness D. Using Ontario's “Telehealth” health telephone helpline as an early-warning system: a study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:10.
- Begier EM, Sockwell D, Branch LM, Davies-Cole JO, Jones LH, Edwards L, The national capitol region’s emergency department syndromic surveillance system: do chief complaint and discharge diagnosis yield different results? Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:393–6.
- Jorm LR, Thackway SV, Churches TR, Hills MW. Watching the games: public health surveillance for the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:102–8.
- Gesteland PH, Gardner RM, Tsui FC, Espino JU, Rolfs RT, James BC, Automated syndromic surveillance for the 2002 Winter Olympics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:547–54.
- Espino JU, Wagner MM, Szczepaniak C, Tsui F-C, Su H, Olszewski R, Removing a barrier to computer-based outbreak and disease surveillance—the RODS open source project. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(suppl):32–9.
- Lombardo J, Burkom HS, Elbert E, Magruder SF, Lewis S, Loschen W, A systems overview of the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics (ESSENCE II). J Urban Health. 2003;80(Suppl 1):i32–42.
- Irvin CB, Nouhan PP, Rice K. Syndromic analysis of computerized emergency department patients’ chief complaints: an opportunity for bioterrorism and influenza surveillance. Am Emerg Med. 2003;41:447–52.
- Muscatello DJ, Churches T, Kaldor J, Zheng W, Chiu C, Correll P, An automated, broad-based, near real-time public health surveillance system using presentations to hospital emergency departments in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:141.
- Canadian Institute for Health Information. Executive summary: database background and general data limitations documentation. National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) FY 2005–2006. Ottawa (Ontario, Canada): The Institute; 2006 [cited 2008 Mar 10]. Available from http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/NACRS_Background_General_Data_Limit_Executive_Summary_2005-2006_e.pdf
- van Dijk A, McGuinness D, Rolland E, Moore KM. Can Telehealth respiratory call volume be used as a proxy for emergency department respiratory visit surveillance by public health? CJEM. 2008;10:18–24.
- Tsui F-C, Espino JU, Dato VM, Gesteland PH, Hutman J, Wagner MM. Technical description of RODS: a real-time public health surveillance system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:399–408.
- Cooper DL, Smith GE, Hollyoak VA, Joseph CA, Jones LH, Chaloner R. Use of NHS direct calls for surveillance of influenza—a second year’s experience. Commun Dis Public Health. 2002;5:127–31.
- Harcourt SE, Smith GE, Hollyoak V, Joseph CA, Chaloner R, Rehnman Y, Can calls to NHS Direct be used for syndromic surveillance? Commun Dis Public Health. 2001;4:178–82.
- Zheng W, Aitken R, Muscatello DJ, Churches TR. Potential for early warning of viral influenza activity in the community by monitoring clinical diagnoses of influenza in hospital emergency departments. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:250.
- Figure. Weekly totals of emergency department surveillance system (EDSS) respiratory chief complaints, National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) respiratory visits, and calls to Telehealth Ontario (TH) about respiratory illness, Ontario, Canada,...
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Adam van Dijk, Syndromic Surveillance, Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox & Addington Public Health, 221 Portsmouth Ave, Kingston, ON K7M, Canada 1V5
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: December 16, 2010
- Page last updated: December 16, 2010
- Page last reviewed: December 16, 2010
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)