Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 6—June 2009
Letter

Increase in Group G Streptococcal Infections in a Community Hospital, New York, USA

On This Page
Figures
Altmetric
10
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Identified in 1935 by Lancefield and Hare, group G streptococci (GGS) are part of the normal flora of the pharynx, gastrointestinal tract, genital tract, and skin (13). However, previous case reports have indicated that GGS also could cause complicated infections, including cellulitis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, meningitis, endocarditis, and bacteremia (36). Since the mid-1980s, several studies worldwide have reported an increasing incidence of GGS bacteremia (1,58), but no recent study has been conducted in the United States to determine the incidence of overall GGS infection.

We noticed that an increasing number of patients with GGS have been admitted to Long Island College Hospital in Brooklyn, New York, USA, during the past few years. To better understand the trend of GGS infection in our institution, we retrospectively reviewed charts of patients admitted from January 2003 through December 2007 who had microbiologically proven GGS infection. Inclusion criteria were clinically and microbiologically documented GGS infection in patients who received appropriate antimicrobial drugs and were >18 years of age. Lancefield GGS were identified in the laboratory by latex agglutination test; resistance profiles were not done for GGS.

Figure

Thumbnail of Annual number of patients with group G streptococcal infections admitted to Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA, 2003–2007.

Figure. Annual number of patients with group G streptococcal infections admitted to Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA, 2003–2007.

A total of 73 persons with GGS were admitted to the hospital during the 5-year study period; the number of patients admitted increased yearly (Figure). Mean age of patients was 53 years; most (77%) were <65 years of age; 52% were women, and most (61%) patients were African American. Thirty (41%) patients had polymicrobial infections; other identified organisms included methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (8 [11%]), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (9 [12%]), and gram-negative or anaerobic organisms (13 [18%]).

The spectrum of GGS infections ranged from mild skin and soft tissue infection (34 [46%]) to invasive diseases, including urogenital infection (7 [10%]); lower respiratory tract infection (7 [10%]); pharyngitis (6 [8%]); endocarditis and catheter infection (5 [7%]); and others (14 [19%]), such as peritonitis, pelvic abscess, rectal abscess, and septic arthritis. Four of the 6 persons with pharyngitis were assumed to be colonized with the organism. Eight (24%) of 34 skin and soft tissue infections were associated with bacteremia, 5 (15%) with osteomyelitis, and 20 (59%) with polymicrobial infections. Six persons with lower respiratory tract infections and 1 each with endocarditis, genital tract infection, pelvic abscess, and dental abscess also had polymicrobial infections.

Eighteen persons had bacteremia, the trend of which also increased yearly. Of these, 8 had skin and soft tissue infections, 4 had endocarditis, 2 had urinary tract infections, 1 had possible spontaneous bacteria peritonitis, and 1 had hemodialysis catheter infection; 2 were of unknown source. Of the patients with endocarditis, 2 had vegetations on the native valves, 1 had a pacemaker infection, and 1 had prosthetic valve vegetation. One case of native valve endocarditis occurred in a tricuspid valve in an injection drug user. Another case occurred in a patient in which an epidural abscess was associated with an aortic valve vegetation.

Most of the patients had underlying medical conditions; 34% had diabetes mellitus. In contrast to previous reports, which stated that malignancy was the most common underlying disease (2,3), only 7 (10%) of the patients in our study group had underlying malignancy, of whom 4 had active malignancy and the rest had had previous malignancy. Nine patients with a history of injection drug use and 5 with HIV infection were identified; the patient with bacteremia secondary to hemodialysis catheter infection had a history of both HIV and intravenous drug use.

Three (4%) patients died; their deaths were unlikely to be attributable to GGS because all were elderly (78–92 years) and had underlying coexisting conditions and co-infections. All 4 persons with endocarditis and the patient with the catheter infection survived. Five patients who were co-infected with MRSA were treated with vancomycin or daptomycin; the remainder were treated with β-lactam antimicrobial drugs and had the sources of infection (catheter or pacemaker) removed. When infections caused by gram-negative or anaerobe organisms were identified, they were also treated with appropriate antimicrobial drugs. The overall average length of stay for all patients with GGS was 9.4 days, with longer stays for those with underlying diabetes mellitus (14.6 days) than for those without diabetes (6.7 days).

GGS was an important etiologic agent for a wide spectrum of infections. Its impressive increase in our institution during the past 5 years raises concerns because other types of β-hemolytic streptococcal infection have increased recently. Group A and B (9,10) increased substantially during the 1980s. A multicenter analysis may confirm GGS as an emerging human pathogen and may help us better understand the reason for this increase.

Top

San S. WongComments to Author , Yu S. Lin, Liby Mathew, Latha Rajagopal, and Douglas Sepkowitz

Author affiliations: Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA

Top

References

  1. Cohen-Poradosu  R, Jaffe  J, Lavi  D, Grisariu-Greenzaid  S, Nir-Paz  R, Valinsky  L, Group G streptococcal bacteremia in Jerusalem. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:145560.PubMed
  2. Vartian  C, Lerner  PI, Shlaes  DM, Gopalakrishna  KV. Infections due to Lancefield group G streptococci. Medicine (Baltimore). 1985;64:7588. DOIPubMed
  3. Liao  CH, Liu  LC, Huang  YT, Teng  LJ, Hsueh  PR. Bacteremia caused by group G streptococci, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:83740. DOIPubMed
  4. Venezio  FR, Gullberg  RM, Westenfelder  GO, Phair  JP, Cook  FV. Group G streptococcal endocarditis and bacteremia. Am J Med. 1986;81:2934. DOIPubMed
  5. Mohan  PK, Shanmugam  JJ, Nair  AA, Tharakan  JJ. Fatal outcome of group-G streptococcal meningitis (a case report). J Postgrad Med. 1989;35:4950.PubMed
  6. Burkert  T, Watanakunakorn  C. Group G streptococcus septic arthritis and osteomyelitis: report and literature review. J Rheumatol. 1991;18:9047.PubMed
  7. Sylvetsky  N, Raveh  D, Schlesinger  Y, Rudensky  B, Yinnon  AM. Bacteremia due to beta-hemolytic streptococcus group G: increasing incidence and clinical characteristics of patients. Am J Med. 2002;12:6226. DOI
  8. Woo  PCY, Fung  AMY, Lau  SKP, Wong  SSY, Yuen  K-Y. Group G beta-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia characterized by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:314755. DOIPubMed
  9. Stevens  DL, Tanner  MH, Winship  J, Swarts  R, Ries  KM, Schlievert  PM, Severe group A streptococcal infections associated with a toxic shock-like syndrome and scarlet fever toxin A. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:17.PubMed
  10. Farley  MM, Harvey  RC, Stull  T, Smith  JD, Schuchat  A, Wenger  JD, A population-based assessment of invasive disease due to group B streptococcus in nonpregnant adults. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:180711. DOIPubMed

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1506.080666

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 15, Number 6—June 2009

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

San S. Wong, Department of Internal Medicine, Long Island College Hospital, 2435 65th St, Brooklyn, NY 11204, USA

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: December 08, 2010
Page updated: December 08, 2010
Page reviewed: December 08, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external