Volume 16, Number 4—April 2010
Clostridium difficile in Ground Meat, France
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Bouttier S, Barc M, Felix B, Lambert S, Collignon A, Barbut F, et al. Clostridium difficile in Ground Meat, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(4):733-735. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1604.091138|
|AMA||Bouttier S, Barc M, Felix B, et al. Clostridium difficile in Ground Meat, France. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2010;16(4):733-735. doi:10.3201/eid1604.091138.|
|APA||Bouttier, S., Barc, M., Felix, B., Lambert, S., Collignon, A., & Barbut, F. (2010). Clostridium difficile in Ground Meat, France. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 16(4), 733-735. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1604.091138.|
To the Editor: Clostridium difficile is a toxigenic enteropathogen responsible for 15%–20% of antimicrobial drug–associated diarrhea and for almost all cases of pseudomembranous colitis. Two protein toxins (TcdA and TcdB) play a major role in the pathogenesis of infections. C. difficile is also recognized as a cause of disease in several animal species, which could be potential reservoirs (1). In the past few years, the presence of C. difficile in raw diets for dogs and cats and in retail meat sold for human consumption has been reported in the United States and Canada at rates from 6% to 42% (2–5). To determine C. difficile contamination of meat in France, we evaluated 105 packages of ground beef (vacuum packed or not), 59 pork sausages, and 12 packages of feline raw diet meat purchased from 20 urban and suburban Paris retail stores and supermarkets during September 2007–July 2008.
C. difficile spores or vegetative forms in samples were found as described by Rodriguez-Palacios et al. (4). Briefly, 5 g of each sample was cultured in 100 mL of prereduced brain–heart infusion (BHI) broth supplemented with cefoxitin (10 µg/mL), cycloserine (250 µg/mL), and taurocholate (0.1%). After the samples were incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37°C for 72 h, subculturing with and without alcohol shock for spore selection was performed. The BHI broth culture was treated with 2 mL of absolute ethanol (1:1 vol/vol) for 30 min and centrifuged at 3,800 × g for 10 min, and the pellet was resuspended in 200 µL of prereduced BHI broth. Serial dilutions of the BHI broth and the pellet were injected onto Columbia cysteine agar supplemented with cefoxitin-cycloserine, taurocholate, and 5% horse blood and incubated anaerobically for 48 h at 37°C.
C. difficile colonies were identified classically, and susceptibilities to moxifloxacin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, metronidazole, linezolid, levofloxacin, telithromycin, erythromycin, and lincomycin were determined by the agar disk-diffusion methods described by the French Society for Microbiology (www.sfm.asso.fr). PCR amplifications of a species-specific internal fragment of the triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) gene, an internal fragment of the toxin B (tcdB) gene, and the 3′ region of the toxin A (tcdA) gene were performed as described by Lemee et al. (6). Strains were characterized by toxinotyping according to Rupnik et al. (7) and PCR-ribotyping as described by Bidet et al. (8).
The detection threshold of the enrichment method was established by spiking known uninfected samples (ground beef, pork sausage, and feline raw diets) with vegetative cells and spores of C. difficile (VPI 10463 strain). For ground beef samples, the detection thresholds for vegetative forms and spores were 2 CFU/5 g and 4.5 CFU/5 g of meat, respectively. For pork sausages, the detection thresholds were 14 CFU/5 g and 38 CFU/5 g of sample after 72 h, for vegetative forms and spores, respectively. For feline raw diets, the detection threshold of spores was 2 CFU/5 g of sample. In addition, toxin B was detected in the culture supernatants by the cytotoxicity assay onto MRC-5 cells. Toxin detection showed 100% agreement with the culture method.
C. difficile was not detected in pork sausages or in commercial feline raw diets. C. difficile was isolated from 2 (1.9%) of 105 ground beef, but only from those packages that were vacuum packed. The anaerobic atmosphere of vacuum packaging could facilitate the survival of C. difficile and the germination of spores. These 2 isolates were fully susceptible to moxifloxacin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, metronidazole, and linezolid but resistant to levofloxacin, telithromycin, erythromycin, and lincomycin. They harbored genes encoding for Tpi protein and for TcdA and TcdB. The 2 strains belonged to the toxinotype 0 and PCR-ribotype 012. Toxinotype 0 was already identified in meat samples in Canada (4). PCR-ribotype 012 belongs to the 10 ribotypes most frequently isolated from humans (9).
The prevalence of C. difficile in ground meat in France is low compared with the prevalence reported by other countries. In Canada, Rodriguez-Palacios et al. (4) studied 60 beef samples and found the prevalence of C. difficile to be 20%. These same authors, by using a broader sampling scheme (214 meat samples), isolated C. difficile from 6% of the samples (5). Also in Canada, Weese et al. (10) reported that 12% of ground beef and ground pork samples were contaminated. In the United States, C. difficile was isolated from 42% of meat samples (beef, pork, and turkey products) (3).
For a better understanding of the sources of C. difficile in France, it would be interesting to determine its prevalence in different animal fecal samples and the toxinotypes associated with animals. The low prevalence in retail meat in France could result from hazard analysis critical control point principles and microbiologic quality controls implemented throughout the food production chain, which help reduce the spread of C. difficile and minimize the risk for infection for the consumer.
- Jhung MA, Thompson AD, Killgore GE, Zubowski WE, Songer G, Warny M, Toxinotype V Clostridium difficile in humans and food animals. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1039–45.
- Weese JS, Rousseau J, Arroyo L. Bacteriological evaluation of commercial canine and feline raw diets. Can Vet J. 2005;46:513–6.
- Songer JG, Trinh HT, Killgore GE, Thompson AD, McDonald C, Limbago BM. Clostridium difficile in retail meat products, USA, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:819–21.
- Rodriguez-Palacios A, Staempfli HR, Duffield T, Weese JS. Clostridium difficile in retail ground meat, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:485–7.
- Rodriguez-Palacios A, Reid-Smith RJ, Staempfli HR, Martin H, Daignault D, Janecko N, Possible seasonality of Clostridium difficile in retail meat, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:802–5.
- Lemee L, Dhalluin A, Testelin S, Mattrat MA, Maillard K, Lemeland JF, Multiplex PCR targeting tpi (triose phosphate isomerase), tcdA (toxin A), and tcdB (toxinB) genes for toxinogenic culture of Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:5710–4.
- Rupnik M, Avesani V, Janc M, von Eichel-Streiber C, Delmée M. A novel toxinotyping scheme and correlation of toxinotypes with serogroups of Clostridium difficile isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:2240–7.
- Bidet P, Lalande V, Salauze B, Burghoffer B, Avesani V, Delmée M, Comparison of PCR-ribotyping, arbitrarily primed PCR and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2484–7.
- Barbut F, Mastrantonio P, Delmée M, Brazier J, Kuijper E, Poxton I. European Study Group on Clostridium difficile (ESGCD). Prospective study of Clostridium difficile infections in Europe with phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of the isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:1048–57.
- Weese JS, Avery BP, Rousseau J, Reid-smith RJ. Detection and enumeration of Clostridium difficile in retail beef and pork. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:5009–11.
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Sylvie Bouttier, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Paris-Sud 11, 5 rue Jean-Baptiste Clément, 92290 Châtenay-Malabry, France
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: December 28, 2010
- Page last updated: December 28, 2010
- Page last reviewed: December 28, 2010
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)