Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 16, Number 6—June 2010
Letter

Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 in Skunks, Canada

Cite This Article

To the Editor: In March 2009, a novel influenza virus A (H1N1) emerged in Mexico, and, because of widespread human-to-human transmission, a global pandemic was declared in June 2009 (1). Although most cases have involved humans, pandemic (H1N1) 2009 has sporadically infected swine and turkeys and has also been reported in a small number of pet ferrets, cats, and captive cheetahs, and in a dog (2). Many of these animals were cared for by persons who experienced influenza-like illness and the owner of 1 cat who died had confirmed pandemic (H1N1) 2009 respiratory disease before the cat became ill, which suggests probable human-to animal-transmission of the virus (2).

During mid-December 2009–mid-January 2010, eight striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) died on a mink farm near Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. On January 12, 2010, two of the skunks were brought to the Animal Health Centre in Abbotsford, British Columbia, for postmortem examination. One skunk exhibited purulent nasal exudates. In both skunks, investigators observed splenomegaly and severe pneumonia, characterized by heavy, dark red to purple, lung lobes involving >70% of the lung field. Microscopic examination showed moderate rhinitis and severe bronchopneumonia with intralesional bacteria, areas of interstitial pneumonia, and occasional nematode larvae. Also observed were splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis, plasmacytosis of both lymph nodes and spleen, and mild plasmacytic glomerulonephritis with proteinuria.

Routine bacteriologic culture of lung showed heavy growth of Streptococcus dysgaslactiae subsp. equisimilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Hafnia alvei. That death was caused by uncomplicated mixed bacterial bronchopneumonia in 2 (and possibly up to 8) adult skunks over a 6-week period was considered unlikely. The presence of lungworm was considered incidental. However, the areas of interstitial pneumonia suggested that a primary viral pathogen was likely.

Molecular testing was conducted initially on fresh lung, liver, kidney, and spleen for canine distemper virus and, subsequently, for influenza A virus. The splenic and nodal plasmacytosis and plasmacytic glomerulonephritis also prompted testing for Aleutian disease virus (ADV). Organ samples were negative for canine distemper virus and positive for ADV.

Detection of influenza A virus nucleoprotein and matrix genes and hemagglutinin and neuraminidase typing was performed with real-time reverse transcription–PCR. Organ samples were positive for pandemic (H1N1) 2009, which was confirmed by sequence analysis of DNA fragments obtained in the hemagglutinin, neuraminidase, and matrix gene testing.

Primary viral interstitial pneumonia is frequently complicated by opportunistic bacterial bronchopneumonia and influenza virus A infection has been shown to predispose to pulmonary bacterial toxicity (3). Thus, we concluded that primary pandemic (H1N1) 2009 interstitial pneumonia had predisposed the 2 skunks to mixed bacterial bronchopneumonia and death. The skunks were also infected with ADV, presumably as a result of viral shedding by the minks, which are known to be ADV carriers. Striped skunks can be experimentally infected with ADV, and antibodies to ADV have been detected in wild skunks (4). Although ADV does not cause pneumonia (4), co-infection with ADV and influenza A virus is associated with higher mortality rates in minks with respiratory disease (5). Thus, ADV co-infection may have contributed to the severity of the pneumonia and the death of the skunks.

The source of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus is unclear. Nasal discharge was also observed in many of the minks, which suggests that they had a respiratory viral infection. However, no diagnostic workup was undertaken. Although severe outbreaks of interstitial pneumonia on mink farms can occur (6), most natural influenza A virus infections in minks are either mild or asymptomatic (5). Thus, the minks may also have been infected with pandemic (H1N1) 2009. Many of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infections reported in animals are believed to have been the result of exposure to infected humans (2). Workers on the mink farm did not experience influenza-like illness. However, humans with asymptomatic pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection may have transmitted it to the mink. Because the skunks visited the mink farm daily, transmission of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 from humans to minks to skunks is a possibility.

In view of the detection of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus in 2 striped skunks with fatal pneumonia, this species should now be regarded as a potential source of influenza A virus. Wild animals participate in the transmission of influenza A viruses between species, and the presence of wildlife on farms is known to be a risk factor for infection of poultry (7). Similar to raccoons, skunks express both α2,3 and α2,6 sialic acid receptors for avian and human influenza viruses in the respiratory tract (M. Shrenzel, San Diego Zoo, pers. comm.), which is believed to create the opportunity for mixed influenza infections with potential for genetic reassortment (8). Skunks, like raccoons, are highly mobile animals with large home ranges in rural and urban areas, which provides numerous opportunities for influenza A virus exposure and transmission to poultry, livestock, pets, and, ultimately, humans. The inclusion of striped skunks in wildlife influenza surveillance programs may be warranted.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Sandra Etheridge, Joanne Taylor, and Erin Zabek for their assistance and technical expertise; and Helen Schwantje, John Robinson, and Victoria Bowes for their valuable contribution to the case workup.

Top

Ann P. BrittonComments to Author , Ken R. Sojonky, Andrea P. Scouras, and Julie J. Bidulka

Author affiliations: Animal Health Centre, British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. Programmes and projects, media centre, statements 2009 [cited 2010 Feb 11]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/
  2. American Veterinary Medical Association. Public health, influenza, 2009 H1N1 flu virus outbreak, February 8, 2010 [cited 2010 Feb 22]. http://www.avma.org/public_health/influenza/new_virus/
  3. Jakeman  KJ, Rushton  DI, Smith  H, Sweet  C. Exacerbation of bacterial toxicity to infant ferrets by influenza virus: possible role in sudden infant death syndrome. J Infect Dis. 1991;163:3540.PubMed
  4. Kenyon  AJ, Kenyon  BJ, Hahn  EC. Protides of the mustelidae: immunoresponse of mustelids to Aleutian mink disease virus. Am J Vet Res. 1978;39:10115.PubMed
  5. Gagnon  CA, Spearman  G, Hamel  A, Godson  DL, Fortin  A, Fortin  G, Characterization of a Canadian mink H3N2 influenza A virus isolate genetically related to triple reassortant swine influenza virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:7969. DOIPubMed
  6. Englund  L, Klingeborn  B, Mejerland  T. Avian influenza A virus causing an outbreak of contagious interstitial pneumonia in mink. Acta Vet Scand. 1986;27:497504.PubMed
  7. Vandalen  KK, Shriner  SA, Sullivan  HJ, Root  JJ, Franklin  AB. Monitoring exposure to avian influenza viruses in wild mammals. Mammal Rev. 2009:1–11 [cited 2010 Feb 11]. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wildlife_damage/nwrc/publications/09pubs/vandalen091.pdf
  8. Hall  JS, Bentler  KT, Landolt  G, Elmore  SA, Minnis  RB, Campbell  TA, Influenza infection in wild raccoons. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:18428. DOIPubMed

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1606.100352

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 16, Number 6—June 2010

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Ann P. Britton, Animal Health Centre, British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, 1767 Angus Campbell Rd, Abbotsford, British Columbia V3G 2M3, Canada

Send To

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Top

Page created: February 14, 2011
Page updated: February 14, 2011
Page reviewed: February 14, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external