Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 16, Number 7—July 2010

Novel Human Parvovirus 4 Genotype 3 in Infants, Ghana

Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Marcus Panning1, Robin Kobbe, Silke Vollbach, Ana Maria Bispo de Filippis, Samuel Adjei, Ohene Adjei, Sung Sup Park, Jürgen May, and Anna Maria Eis-HübingerComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Institute of Virology, Bonn, Germany (M. Panning, S. Vollbach, J.F. Drexler, C. Drosten, A.M. Eis-Hübinger); Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany (R. Kobbe, J. May); Ministry of Health/Ghana Health Service, Agona, Ghana (S. Adjei); Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine, Kumasi, Ghana (O. Adjei)

Cite This Article


Human parvovirus 4 has been considered to be transmitted only parenterally. However, after novel genotype 3 of parvovirus 4 was found in 2 patients with no parenteral risks, we tested infants in Ghana. A viremia rate of 8.6% over 2 years indicates that this infection is common in children in Africa.

In 2005, a novel human parvovirus, termed parvovirus 4 (PARV4), was identified in a plasma sample from a patient with symptoms resembling those of acute HIV infection (1). In 2006, a related virus was discovered in plasma pools for manufacture of plasma-derived medical products; the virus was initially called PARV5 and is now called PARV4 genotype 2 (2). Phylogenetic analysis suggested that PARV4 formed a separate novel genus within the subfamily Parvovirinae.

Initial PCR analyses of blood and autopsy specimens from adults suggested that PARV4 infection was restricted to persons at risk for parenteral infection with viruses such as hepatitis C virus (HCV) or HIV (e.g., injection drug users) (35). A recent serologic study identified high frequencies of immunoglobulin G against PARV4 in injection drug users who were co-infected with HCV and HIV and in persons with hemophilia who had been exposed to non–virus-inactivated clotting factor concentrates (6). Absence of serologic reactivity in adults without parenteral risk factors supported an association between PARV4 and blood-borne transmission.

Only limited genetic diversity has been found among PARV4 sequences, particularly among genotype 1 viruses, suggesting recent emergence and spread among parenterally exposed persons in Europe and the United States (5). Because persons with PARV4 genotype 1 DNA in their tissues have been substantially younger than those with genotype 2, a recent shift in prevalence of the 2 genotypes has been suggested; genotype 1 currently predominates (4). An even more pronounced shift was found for parvovirus B19 in that nearly complete cessation of genotype 2 and replacement by genotype 1 occurred in the 1960s in western countries (7). Furthermore, molecular clock analysis indicated that B19 genotype 3, which is endemic to West Africa and rarely detected outside Africa, may be more ancient than genotypes 1 and 2 (8).

Recently, a novel PARV4 variant, termed genotype 3, was identified in tissue samples of 2 adults from Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (9). Each patient had signs of AIDS but was antibody negative for HCV and had no evidence of parenteral exposure. The absence of parenteral risks raises the possibility of alternative routes of transmission that might affect the general, nonparenterally exposed, population (9). Proving nonparenteral transmission would suggest more widespread distribution of PARV4 in humans than previously expected and occurrence of virus in additional population subsets. We therefore studied the occurrence of PARV4 in infants in Ghana.

The Study

We analyzed 279 anonymous blood samples that had been collected during a trial of intermittent preventive malaria treatment for infants from January 2004 through September 2005 (10). Samples came from infants from 9 villages in the rural Afigya Sekyere district, Ashanti region, Ghana, where estimated prevalences of HIV-1 and HCV in adults were <3% (10) and 2.5% (11), respectively. For storage under tropical conditions, an equal volume of whole blood in EDTA was supplemented with buffer AS1 (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). DNA isolation was conducted on a BioRobot M48 workstation (QIAGEN), using the MagAttract M48 DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN) as recommended (sample input volume 200 µL, elution volume 200 µL).

All samples were first tested by a previously described real-time PCR designed to detect established PARV4 genotypes 1 and 2 (12). When initial sequencing identified novel PARV4 genotype 3, a specific real-time PCR for this genotype was developed by using primers 5′-ACCAAGGACACCAGACAGTCTT-3′ and 5′-ACGTGTTCAGACCAAAAGGAT-3′ and probe 5′-FAM-CCAGCTCCATACCTTTCAGCAGTTGC-BHQ1-3′. All samples were retested by using a plasmid-based standard derived from the real-time PCR amplicon of sample Ghana19 for absolute quantification of genome copy numbers. The lower limit of detection of this assay was 10 plasmid copies/reaction. Procedures to prevent PCR contamination were strictly adhered to, and negative controls were used throughout.

In total, 24 (8.6%) of 279 samples were positive for PARV4 genotype 3 DNA. At the time of blood collection, no infant had signs of acute infection (fever, rash, myalgia). Positive samples were found for infants in 7 of 9 studied villages, indicating widespread prevalence. To test whether socioeconomic factors might influence prevalence, we conducted a χ2 test. A significantly lower relative risk of acquiring PARV4 infection was found for children who had access to a kitchen (indicative of higher level of hygiene within household) and who did not live close to a river (Table).

Two age groups were randomly selected from the cohort: 1) 94 infants with a median age of 14.9 months (interquartile range 14.5–15.5 months; 47 male, 47 female) and 2) 185 infants with a median age of 24.0 months (interquartile range 23.5–24.2 months; 92 male, 93 female). Significantly more positive results were seen among infants in the older versus the younger age group (22/185 [11.9%] vs. 2/94 [2.1%], respectively; p<0.006). Viral loads in the whole study group ranged from 420 to 56,000 copies/mL of whole blood (median 3,400 copies/mL). Median viral loads did not differ significantly between the age groups (4,300 vs. 3,200 copies/mL).


Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis of human parvovirus 4 (PARV4) nucleotide sequences. The concatenated dataset of 746 open reading frame (ORF) 1 nt and 558 ORF2 nt (except for strains 14 [550 nt sequenced in ORF1] and 16 [218 nt sequenced in ORF2]) was subjected to neighbor-joining–based phylogenetic analysis with 1,000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA4 by using the Kimura substitution model and the complete deletion option for gaps (14). Bovine hokovirus was used as an outgroup because it is the c

Figure. Phylogenetic analysis of human parvovirus 4 (PARV4) nucleotide sequences. The concatenated dataset of 746 open reading frame (ORF) 1 nt and 558 ORF2 nt (except for strains 14 [550 nt sequenced...

A 746-nt fragment of open reading frame (ORF) 1 and a 558-nt fragment of the ORF2 gene and the noncoding region between them were sequenced. Maximal nucleotide distances from previously known PARV4 sequences were 7%–8%. To obtain highly informative sequence datasets for phylogenetic analysis, we concatenated ORF1 and 2 sequences and excluded interfragment recombination by using SimPlot and GARD analysis with the HYPHY package (13). We then conducted phylogenetic analysis on the concatenated fragments by using the neighbor-joining method (Figure). The novel viruses from Ghana clustered in a monophyletic clade with the Nigerian PARV4 genotype 3 prototype strain NG-OR. Within this clade, sequences 1, 3, 4, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 23, and 24, sampled from the 2 neighboring villages Asamang and Kona, formed a separate monophyletic subclade, suggesting local epidemic transmission of a unique virus lineage.


Although infection with human parvovirus PARV4 has been considered to be restricted to adults and transmitted parenterally, we found high prevalence of PARV4 genotype 3 in blood of infants in Africa. In agreement with findings for the 2 adults with PARV4 genotype 3 infection (9), clinical signs in these children were not overt. PARV4 infection might thus be clinically silent, or acute infection might be followed by low-level viremia that is cleared slowly, similar to infection with B19.

Finding PARV4 genotype 3 over a 2-year period in several villages suggests common and ubiquitous prevalence. Parenteral medical treatment could be clearly ruled out as a transmission route for the viremic children >2 months of age because these children were under medical observation. It could not be ruled out for younger children; however, because such treatment is uncommon in the rural Ashanti region, it is unlikely. The possibility of virus transmission by vaccination with inadequately sterilized needles is excluded because vaccination was conducted with single-used syringes. Finding virus in persons without parenteral exposure overlaps with a recently raised suspicion regarding a different epidemiology of PARV4 infection in Africa as opposed to the Northern Hemisphere (9).

High prevalence in children in Africa contrasts with the prevalence pattern in the Northern Hemisphere, suggesting different dynamics and routes of transmission. Prenatal or perinatal transient infection can be largely ruled out because the older children had substantially higher rates of viremia. On the contrary, our analysis of socioeconomic factors identified a reciprocal association of transmission risk with access to a kitchen and distance from a river. Foodborne or smear transmission (contact with contaminated objects) are thus suspected. In conclusion, in Africa, novel PARV4 genotype 3 is prevalent among infants who are most likely not at risk for parenteral exposure.

Dr Panning is a physician and medical virologist specializing in emerging viruses. His research interests are development of molecular diagnostic assays for patient care and virus ecology studies.



We thank Hanna Heidemann, Ulrike Reber, and Carmen Poster for excellent technical assistence.

This study was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (grant 01KA0202 to J.M. and grant 01ES0814 to C.D.), the European Union (grant F3-2009-22349E to C.D.), and BONFOR (grant O-151.0021 to A.M.E.-H.).



  1. Jones  MS, Kapoor  A, Lukashov  VV, Simmonds  P, Hecht  F, Delwart  E. New DNA viruses identified in patients with acute viral infection syndrome. J Virol. 2005;79:82306. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fryer  JF, Kapoor  A, Minor  PD, Delwart  E, Baylis  SA. Novel parvovirus and related variant in human plasma. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fryer  JF, Lucas  SB, Padley  D, Baylis  SA. Parvoviruses PARV4/5 in hepatitis C virus–infected patient. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1756. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Manning  A, Willey  SJ, Bell  JE, Simmonds  P. Comparison of tissue distribution, persistence, and molecular epidemiology of parvovirus B19 and novel human parvoviruses PARV4 and human bocavirus. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:134552. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Simmonds  P, Manning  A, Kenneil  R, Carnie  FW, Bell  JE. Parenteral transmission of the novel human parvovirus PARV4. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:13868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sharp  CP, Lail  A, Donfield  S, Simmons  R, Leen  C, Klenerman  P, High frequencies of exposure to the novel human parvovirus PARV4 in hemophiliacs and injection drug users, as detected by a serological assay for PARV4 antibodies. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:111925. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Norja  P, Hokynar  K, Aaltonen  LM, Chen  R, Ranki  A, Partio  EK, Bioportfolio: lifelong persistence of variant and prototypic erythrovirus DNA genomes in human tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:74503. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Parsyan  A, Szmaragd  C, Allain  JP, Candotti  D. Identification and genetic diversity of two human parvovirus B19 genotype 3 subtypes. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:42831. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Simmonds  P, Douglas  J, Bestetti  G, Longhi  E, Antinori  S, Parravicini  C, A third genotype of the human parvovirus PARV4 in sub-Saharan Africa. J Gen Virol. 2008;89:2299302. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kobbe  R, Kreuzberg  C, Adjei  S, Thompson  B, Langefeld  I, Thompson  PA, A randomized controlled trial of extended intermittent preventive antimalarial treatment in infants. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1625. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lassey  AT, Damale  NK, Bekoe  V, Klufio  CA. Hepatitis C virus seroprevalence among mothers delivering at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana. East Afr Med J. 2004;81:198201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fryer  JF, Delwart  E, Hecht  FM, Bernardin  F, Jones  MS, Shah  N, Frequent detection of the parvoviruses, PARV4 and PARV5, in plasma from blood donors and symptomatic individuals. Transfusion. 2007;47:105461. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kosakovsky Pond  SL, Posada  D, Gravenor  MB, Woelk  CH, Frost  SD. GARD: a genetic algorithm for recombination detection. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:30968. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tamura  K, Dudley  J, Nei  M, Kumar  S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:15969. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1607.100025

1Current affiliation: Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Freiburg, Germany.

Table of Contents – Volume 16, Number 7—July 2010

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger, Institute of Virology, University of Bonn Medical Centre, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25 53127 Bonn, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: March 02, 2011
Page updated: March 02, 2011
Page reviewed: March 02, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.