Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011

Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Pakistan, 2005–2009

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Pakistan is 1 of 22 countries listed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as having a high incidence of tuberculosis (TB). We recently reported an increase in rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB with emergence of extensively drug-resistant TB (1). Fluoroquinolone resistance is associated with worse outcome in patients with MDR TB (2). Recent evidence suggests emergence and increasing incidence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis from several countries, particularly in MDR strains (3). We present data from a tertiary care referral center laboratory in Pakistan to assess fluoroquinolone resistance in MDR TB strains during 2005–2009.

The Aga Khan University Hospital and its clinical laboratory have been accredited by the Joint Commission of International Accreditation and designated as a technical partner of the National TB Program. M. tuberculosis susceptibility testing is also periodically validated by the WHO Supranational Reference Laboratory network. The microbiology laboratory serves different cities across Pakistan with ≈180 peripheral collection units. Specimens for TB cultures are requested by physicians and received through passive collection and thus are not restricted to programmed surveys. All specimens received at each of the collection units are sent to the central laboratory in Karachi for culture and drug susceptibility testing (DST). Specimens reach the main laboratory within 24 hours after receipt.

During the past 4 years, the laboratory has received 12,000–15,000 specimens annually for M. tuberculosis culture; positivity rate has been 15%–20%. Culture and DST are performed at the laboratory in accordance with Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute and WHO recommendations, as described (4). During 2005–2008, fluoroquinolone susceptibilities for all MDR and polydrug-resistant isolates were determined by using ciprofloxacin (2 μg/mL). From 2009 onwards, fluoroquinolone susceptibilities were determined by using ofloxacin (2 μg/mL), and second-line DST was performed for all M. tuberculosis isolates.

During 2005–2009, a total of 11,263 cultures were reported positive for M. tuberculosis. Of these, 34.4% were MDR, and 50.1% were sensitive to all 4 first-line agents (isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol). Because of inconsistencies in testing criteria for fluoroquinolones (fluoroquinolone testing being conducted primarily for MDR cases during 2005–2008), the overall fluoroquinolone-resistance rate could not be determined. However, for MDR strains, fluoroquinolone susceptibilities were consistently determined, and resistance rates increased from 17.41% in 2005 to 42.92% in 2009 (p<0.001, by χ2 test for trend analysis) (Table).

A progressive increase in fluoroquinolone use and its association with increase in resistance against organisms other than M. tuberculosis have been reported from Pakistan (5). We report a progressive increase in fluoroquinolone resistance rate in MDR M. tuberculosis isolates during a 5-year period. This finding is consistent with those of several studies reporting fluoroquinolone resistance from the region. Agrawal et al. have recently reported an exponential increase in fluoroquinolone resistance in India from 3% in 1996 to 35% in 2004 (6). A significant increase in fluoroquinolone resistance from 7.7% to 20% in MDR TB was also reported from Taiwan (7); the authors correlated this finding with the inappropriate use of fluoroquinolones for managing TB rather than with fluoroquinolone misuse in the community. Another study from the United States and Canada reported 4.1% fluoroquinolone resistance in MDR TB strains (8).

In addition to detecting increasing fluoroquinolone resistance in MDR isolates, we have also detected fluoroquinolone resistance in non-MDR, polydrug-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates. Moreover, in 2009, a total of 3.1% of isolates susceptible to all first-line agents were fluoroquinolone resistant.

Although our dataset includes samples from throughout Pakistan, sampling limitations prevent us from deriving definite conclusions and generalizing results to the entire population of the country. A referral bias attributable to passive sampling exists because cases referred to our laboratory tend to be more complicated. Moreover, treatment history was not available for patients in our dataset; therefore, increased fluoroquinolone resistance could not be correlated with prior fluoroquinolone use. However, our findings have implications for therapy with fluoroquinolones for TB and other infections.

Fluoroquinolones are freely available as over-the-counter medications to the general population (9), which creates potential for misuse of fluoroquinolones by the general population for TB and several other infections, such as enteric fever and genitourinary infections. Furthermore, because national guidelines for treating enteric fever and genitourinary infections do not exist, these drugs are also overprescribed by physicians. We propose control of over-the-counter availability of fluoroquinolones and judicious use of this class of drugs by physicians to prevent further escalation in resistance rates in Pakistan.


Kauser JabeenComments to Author , Sadia Shakoor, Shazia Chishti, Afsheen Ayaz, and Rumina Hasan
Author affiliations: Author affiliation: Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan



  1. Hasan  R, Jabeen  K, Mehraj  V, Zafar  F, Malik  F, Hassan  Q, Trends of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) resistance over a period of 17 years from Pakistan. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:e37782. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Johnston  JC, Shahidi  NC, Sadatsafavi  M, Fitzgerald  JM. Treatment outcomes of multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6914. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization. Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB). 2010 Global report on surveillance and response. WHO/HTM/TB/2010.3. Geneva. Organization. 2010;▪▪▪:158.
  4. Hasan  R, Jabeen  K, Ali  A, Rafiq  Y, Laiq  R, Malik  B, Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, Pakistan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:14735. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Okeke  IN, Laxminarayan  R, Bhutta  ZA, Duse  AG, Jenkins  P, O’Brien  TF, Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. Part 1: recent trends and current status. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:48193. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Agrawal  D, Udwadia  ZF, Rodriguez  C, Mehta  A. Increasing incidence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mumbai, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13:7983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang  TS, Kunin  CM, Lee  SSJ, Chen  YS, Tu  HZ, Liu  YC. Trends in fluoroquinolone resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in a Taiwanese medical centre: 1995–2003. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:105862. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bozeman  L, Burman  W, Metchock  B, Welch  L, Weiner  M; Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. Fluoroquinolone susceptibility among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the United States and Canada. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:38691. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Butt  ZA, Gilani  AH, Nanan  D, Sheikh  AL, White  F. Quality of pharmacies in Pakistan: A cross-sesctional survey. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:30713. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1703.100957

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Kauser Jabeen, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: July 25, 2011
Page updated: July 25, 2011
Page reviewed: July 25, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.