Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011
Research

Reduction of Coxiella burnetii Prevalence by Vaccination of Goats and Sheep, the Netherlands

Lenny HogerwerfComments to Author , René van den Brom, Hendrik I.J. Roest, Annemarie Bouma, Piet Vellema, Maarten Pieterse, Daan Dercksen, and Mirjam Nielen
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands (L. Hogerwerf, A. Bouma, M. Pieterse, M. Nielen); Animal Health Service, Deventer, the Netherlands (R. van den Brom, P. Vellema, D. Dercksen); Central Veterinary Institute of Wageningen UR, Lelystad, the Netherlands (H.I.J. Roest)

Main Article

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier curves for cycle threshold (Ct) values of all samples (A–C) and for samples with positive and doubtful results for Coxiella burnetii (Ct <40) (D–F), the Netherlands, January 1–June 10, 2009. A, D) Uterine fluid; B, E) vaginal mucus; C, F) milk. Old, pregnant and lactating; young, nulliparous.

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves for cycle threshold (Ct) values of all samples (A–C) and for samples with positive and doubtful results for Coxiella burnetii (Ct <40) (D–F), the Netherlands, January 1–June 10, 2009. A, D) Uterine fluid; B, E) vaginal mucus; C, F) milk. Old, pregnant and lactating; young, nulliparous.

Main Article

Page created: July 25, 2011
Page updated: July 25, 2011
Page reviewed: July 25, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external