Volume 17, Number 5—May 2011
Research
Experimental Infection of Amblyomma aureolatum Ticks with Rickettsia rickettsii
Table 1
Clinical data of hosts infested by a Rickettsia rickettsii–infected colony of Amblyomma aureolatum ticks, and results of PCR performed on unfed ticks from 4 consecutive generations (F1 to F4)*
Tick stage and generation | Infested hosts |
PCR of unfed ticks, no. infected/no. tested | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Host, no. | No. ticks/host | Fever† |
No. deaths | Diagnostic test |
||||
No. | Onset, dpi | PCR‡ | IFA§ | |||||
Nymph–F1 | Guinea pig, 2 | 50 | 2 | 6 | 2 | Pos | ND | 45/45¶ |
Adult–F1 | Dog, 2 | 20 couples | 0 | – | 0 | ND | ND | 10/10 |
Larva–F2 | Guinea pig, 2 | 1,000–2,000 | 2 | 7–8 | 1 | ND | Pos | – |
Larva–F2 | Rabbit, 3 | 1,000–2,000 | 3 | 7–9 | 0 | ND | Pos | – |
Nymph–F2 | Guinea pig, 3 | 80 | 3 | 5 | 2 | Pos | Pos | 30/30 |
Nymph–F2 | Rabbit, 1 | 200 | 1 | 6 | 0 | ND | Pos | – |
Adult–F2 | Rabbit, 2 | 7 couples | 2 | 7–8 | 0 | ND | Pos | – |
Larva–-F3 | Guinea pig, 4 | 1,000–2,000 | 4 | 7–8 | 2 | Pos | Pos | – |
Nymph–F3 | Rabbit, 1 | 400 | 1 | 6 | 0 | ND | Pos | – |
Adult–F3 | Dog, 1 | 12 couples | 0 | – | 0 | ND | ND | – |
Larva–F4 | Guinea pig, 5 | 1,000–3,000 | 5 | 6–7 | 1 | ND | Pos | 100/100 |
Nymph–F4 | Rabbit, 1 | 500 | 1 | 5 | 0 | ND | Pos | 30/30 |
*dpi, days postinfestation; IFA, immunofluorescence assay; pos, positive; ND, not done; –, data not collected.
†Rectal temperature >40°C.
‡PCR performed on lung-extracted DNA from guinea pigs that died during the febrile period.
§A positive result means seroconversion, namely nonreactive (titer <64) at 0 DPI, and reactive (titer >1,024) at 21 dpi.
Previously reported by Labruna et al. (9).
References
- Barrera A. Algunas consideraciones biologicas sobre Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille), 1806, transmisor de fiebre manchada en el norte y noroeste de Mexico. Rev Inst Salubr Enferm Trop. 1956;16:3–14.
- Katz G, Neves VLFC, Angerami RN, Nascimento EMM, Colombo S. Situação epidemiológica e importância da febre maculosa no Estado de São Paulo. Boletim Epidemiológico Paulista. 2009;6:4–13.
- Drummond RO, Whetstone TM. Oviposition of the Gulf coast tick. J Econ Entomol. 1970;66:130–3.
- Fonseca F. Validade da espécie e ciclo evolutivo de Amblyomma striatum Koch, 1844 (Acarina, Ixodidae). Mem Inst Butantan. 1935;9:43–58.
- Ricketts HT. Some aspects of Rocky Mountain spotted fever as shown by recent investigations. Medical Record. 1909;76:843–55.
- Parker RR, Philip CB, Jellison WL. Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Potentialities of tick transmission in relation to geographic occurrence in the United States. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1933;13:341–78.
- Burgdorfer W. Investigation of the “transovarial transmission” of Rickettsia rickettsii in the wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni. Exp Parasitol. 1963;14:152–9. DOI
- Niebylski ML, Peacock MG, Schwan TG. Lethal effect of Rickettsia rickettsii on its tick vector (Dermacentor andersoni). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:773–8.PubMed
- Piranda EM, Faccini JL, Pinter A, Pacheco RC, Cançado PH, Labruna MB. Experimental infection of Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks with the bacterium Rickettsia rickettsii, using experimentally infected dogs. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011; [Epub 2010 Jun 23].
- Burgdorfer W. Ecological and epidemiological considerations of Rocky Mountain spotted fever and scrub typhus. In: Walker DH, editor. Biology of rickettsial diseases. Vol. 1. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Inc.; 1988. p. 33–50.
Page created: August 14, 2011
Page updated: August 14, 2011
Page reviewed: August 14, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.