Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 8—August 2011
Dispatch

Bagaza Virus in Partridges and Pheasants, Spain, 2010

Montserrat Agüero, Jovita Fernández-Pinero, Dolores Buitrago, Azucena Sánchez, Maia Elizalde, Elena San Miguel, Ruben Villalba, Francisco Llorente, and Miguel Ángel Jiménez-ClaveroComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Laboratorio Central de Veterinaria, Algete, Spain (M. Agüero, D. Buitrago, A. Sánchez, E. San Miguel, R. Villalba); Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal, Valdeolmos, Spain (J. Fernández-Pinero, M. Elizalde, F. Llorente, M.A. Jiménez-Clavero)

Main Article

Figure 1

Phylogenetic relationships between a full-length genomic sequence for Bagaza virus identified in Cádiz, Spain, 2010 (solid circle) and 32 full-length flavivirus sequences, including 2 Bagaza virus isolates from GenBank. The phylogenetic tree was inferred by using the maximum-likelihood method. Percentage of 500 successful bootstrap replicates is indicated at the nodes. Evolutionary distances were computed by using the optimal general time reversible + Γ + proportion invariant model. A discrete Γ

Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships between a full-length genomic sequence for Bagaza virus identified in Cádiz, Spain, 2010 (solid circle) and 32 full-length flavivirus sequences, including 2 Bagaza virus isolates from GenBank. The phylogenetic tree was inferred by using the maximum-likelihood method. Percentage of 500 successful bootstrap replicates is indicated at the nodes. Evolutionary distances were computed by using the optimal general time reversible + Γ + proportion invariant model. A discrete Γ distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences among sites (5 categories, G parameter = 2.0552). The rate variation model enabled some sites to be evolutionarily invariable (+I, 10.1524% sites). The tree is drawn to scale, and branch lengths are indicated as number of nucleotide substitutions per site. There were 9,803 positions in the final dataset. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted by using MEGA5 (www.megasoftware.net). GenBank accession numbers are indicated beside each isolate/strain name.

Main Article

Page created: August 15, 2011
Page updated: August 15, 2011
Page reviewed: August 15, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external