Volume 18, Number 1—January 2012
Dispatch
Dengue Outbreak in Key West, Florida, USA, 2009
Table
Variable | No. (%)† persons with infection, n = 13 | No. (%) persons without recent infection, n = 227 | Crude OR (90% CI)‡ |
---|---|---|---|
Bird bath in yard | 5 (41) | 26 (11) | 5.6 (1.5–21.3) |
Windows open >50% of the time | 5 (41) | 37 (15) | 3.9 (1.1–14.0) |
Vegetation covers >50% of yard | 8 (59) | 61 (30) | 3.4 (1.0–11.2) |
Outside in evenings | 11 (86) | 149 (67) | 3.1 (1.0–9.5) |
Bitten by mosquito at work/school | 5 (32) | 28 (14) | 3.0 (1.1–8.2) |
Uses repellent containing DEET | 3 (20) | 98 (41) | 0.4 (0.1– 0.9) |
Uses mosquito bite prevention measures | 4 (26) | 119 (52) | 0.3 (0.1–0.7) |
Air conditioning on >50% of time | 6 (37) | 170 (75) | 0.2 (0.1– 0.6) |
Traveled outside Florida in past 3 mo | 2 (12) | 93 (38) | 0.2 (0.1–0.9) |
Empties water from containers regularly | 1 (6) | 79 (36) | 0.1 (0.0–0.7) |
*OR, odds ratio; DEET, N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide.
†Weighted percentages are reported, reflecting the stratified, 1-stage cluster sampling design. Responses were weighted to account for the different probabilities of household inclusion across strata, within-household participation rates, and interhousehold clustering of infections.
‡Significance level, p = 0.10. Weighted logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors for recent infection, and CIs were based on the modeling accounted for the sampling design.
Page created: December 22, 2011
Page updated: December 22, 2011
Page reviewed: December 22, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.