Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 10—October 2012
Dispatch

Anthroponotic Enteric Parasites in Monkeys in Public Park, China

Author affiliations: East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China (J. Ye, J. Ma, M. Guo, L. Liu, Y. Feng); and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (J. Ye, L. Xiao)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi were detected in 45, 35, and 116 of 411 free-range rhesus monkeys, respectively, in a popular public park in the People’s Republic of China. Most genotypes and subtypes detected were anthroponotic, indicating these animals might be reservoirs for human cryptosporidiosis, giardiasis, and microsporidiosis.

Cryptosporidiosis, giardiasis, and microsporidiosis are enteric diseases in humans and are mainly caused by Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi, respectively (13). These protozoan parasites are also commonly found in animals and are considered zoonotic. However, the role of nonhuman primates in the transmission of the diseases remains unclear because few studies have been conducted on the genetic characteristics of the parasites in these animals. In a recent study in Kenya, 5 (2.0%) and 13 (5.5%) of 235 captive baboons had human-pathogenic C. hominis subtypes and E. bieneusi genotypes, respectively. This finding implies that nonhuman primates might be reservoirs for human cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis (4). We determined the genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium spp., G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi in free-range rhesus monkeys in a popular public park to assess the potential for transmission of these parasites from rhesus monkeys to humans.

The Study

Figure

Thumbnail of Potential zoonotic and waterborne pathways of parasites in Qianling Park, Guiyang, China. A) Close contact of rhesus monkeys with humans. B) Potential contamination of recreational water with pathogens from rhesus monkeys.

Figure. . . . Potential zoonotic and waterborne pathways of parasites in Qianling Park, Guiyang, China. A) Close contact of rhesus monkeys with humans. B) Potential contamination of recreational water with pathogens...

In November 2010, we collected 411 fecal specimens from rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in Qianling Park, Guiyang, People’s Republic of China (www.qlpark.cn). The park, a major tourist attraction of the city, is visited by 10,000–70,000 persons each day. It has the highest number (≈700) of domesticated free-range monkeys in China, which originated from a troop of 20 animals in 1985. Visitors are allowed to bring or buy food to feed the animals, watch them from a short distance, or play with them (Figure, panel A).

We collected fecal droppings at 3 locations with different animal densities. A total of 187 specimens were collected from the Macaque Garden, where animal density was the highest, at ≈400 animals in a small open area between 2 mountains. Another 74 specimens were collected from the Tanquan Spring area, where animal density was the lowest. The remaining 150 specimens were collected from the Hongfu Temple, which had moderate animal density. Twenty-three 100-mL grab samples of high-turbidity water were collected at various points of a small lake near the Macaque Garden and Tanquan Spring, where the rhesus monkeys frequently bathed (Figure).

We detected Cryptosporidium spp., G. duodenalis subtypes, and E. bieneusi genotypes in the fecal specimens and differentiated them by using PCR and sequence analysis of the small subunit rRNA gene (5), triosephosphate isomerase gene (6), and ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (4), respectively. We similarly analyzed water samples after concentrating pathogens by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 15 min. We subtyped C. hominis and C. parvum by using sequence analysis of the 60-kDa glycoprotein gene (5). We analyzed each specimen at least 2× by using PCR, with the inclusion of positive and negative controls in each run. We used the χ2 test to compare differences in rates of each parasite.

We detected Cryptosporidium spp. in 45 (10.9%) of the 411 fecal specimens, belonging to 3 species: C. hominis (39 specimens), C. parvum (5), and C. felis (1). The rate at Macaque Garden (16.6%) was significantly higher than at Hongfu Temple (6.0%; p = 0.003) and Tanquan Spring (6.8%; p = 0.038) (Table). Among 44 specimens successfully subtyped, 7 subtypes in 5 subtype families were identified: 4 families (Ia, Id, Ie, and If) of C. hominis and 1 family (IIc) of C. parvum (Table). The most common subtypes were IaA13R8 (8 specimens), IdA20 (13), IeA11G3T3 (13), and IIcA5G3a (5).

G. duodenalis was identified in 35 (8.5%) of the 411 fecal specimens. The rates at Macaque Garden (10.2%; p = 0.016) and Hongfu Temple (10.0%; p = 0.018) were significantly higher than at Tanquan Spring (1.4%). All positive specimens except for 1 were successfully genotyped and subtyped and belonged to assemblages A (10) and B (24). All assemblage A isolates belonged to subtype A2 (10 specimens). In assemblage B, 7 subtypes were identified: 1 known subtype in 11 specimens and 6 new subtypes at low frequencies (Table).

E. bieneusi was identified in 116 (28.2%) of the 411 fecal specimens. The occurrence rate at Macaque Garden (40.6%) was significantly higher than at Hongfu Temple (21.3%; p = 0.00016) and Tanquan Spring (10.8%; p = 0.000033). Among the 109 specimens successfully sequenced, 6 genotypes were identified: 4 known genotypes (Peru11 [69 specimens], WL15 [28], EbpC [4], and Type IV [6]) and 2 new genotypes at low frequencies (Table).

Cryptosporidium spp., G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi were detected in 11 (47.8%), 12 (52.2%), and 13 (56.5%), respectively, of the 23 water samples collected from the lake where the animals bathed. Fewer C. hominis and G. duodenalis subtypes and E. bieneusi genotypes were detected in water samples than in fecal specimens. Most of the common C. hominis (IaA13R8 and IeA11G3T3) and G. duodenalis (B1 and B5) subtypes and all common E. bieneusi genotypes (Peru11, W15, EbpC, and Type IV) in animals were found in water samples (Table). We deposited unique nucleotide sequences obtained in GenBank under accession nos. JX000562–JX000573.

Conclusions

All C. hominis and C. parvum subtypes found in this study are well-known parasites of humans and have rarely been found in animals. The C. hominis subtype families Ia, Id, Ie, and If had been reported in humans and urban wastewater in China (5,79). Although it has not been found in humans in China, the C. parvum IIc subtype family identified in rhesus monkeys in this study is a well-known anthroponotic parasite in developing countries (1).

The G. duodenalis subtypes found in Qianling Park are also major pathogens in humans. The subtype A2 of assemblage A is a common pathogen in humans in most areas studied and is less frequently found in animals than the A1 subtype (2). The dominant B1 subtype found in Qianling Park is also identical to an assemblage B subtype (GenBank accession no. GU564280) previously identified in humans in China (9).

Most E. bieneusi genotypes identified in this study had also been reported in humans. Among the dominant E. bieneusi genotypes, Peru11 had been seen only in humans and baboons (3,4). Although genotypes IV, EbpC, and WL15 have been reported in animals, they are common parasites of humans in many areas (3).

The origin of Cryptosporidium spp., G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi parasites in the rhesus monkey population is not clear. Because these parasites are common human pathogens, they could have been introduced by humans. However, rhesus monkeys can be natural hosts of these organisms, as supported by recent identification of some of these organisms in newly captive baboons from rural and forested areas (4). Regardless of the initial origin of the parasites, they can be transmitted efficiently among rhesus monkeys, as supported by the higher occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp., G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi at places with higher animal density.

Our results indicate that rhesus monkeys in close contact with humans are commonly infected with human-pathogenic C. hominis, C. parvum, and G. duodenalis subtypes and E. bieneusi genotypes. Therefore, they can serve as reservoirs of human cryptosporidiosis, giardiasis, and microsporidiosis. Zoonotic transmission of infection from these monkeys can occur directly by close contact of monkeys and humans (Figure, panel A), or indirectly through contamination of drinking water or recreational water (Figure, panel B). Efforts should be made to educate the public about the potential risk for zoonotic transmission of enteric pathogens from rhesus monkeys and to minimize contamination of drinking and recreational water by parasites of rhesus monkey origin.

Mr Ye is a doctoral candidate at the East China University of Science and Technology. His research interest focuses on in the molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidia, giardia, and microsporidia.

Top

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31110103901, 31229005, 41001316), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project) (2011CB200903), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Open Funding Projects of the State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology at the Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute and State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering at East China University of Science and Technology.

Top

References

  1. Xiao  L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124:809. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Feng  Y, Xiao  L. Zoonotic potential and molecular epidemiology of Giardia species and giardiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24:11040. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Santín  M, Fayer  R. Microsporidiosis: Enterocytozoon bieneusi in domesticated and wild animals. Res Vet Sci. 2011;90:36371. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Li  W, Kiulia  NM, Mwenda  JM, Nyachieo  A, Taylor  MB, Zhang  X, Cyclospora papionis, Cryptosporidium hominis, and human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi in captive baboons in Kenya. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:43269. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng  Y, Li  N, Duan  L, Xiao  L. Cryptosporidium genotype and subtype distribution in raw wastewater in Shanghai, China: evidence for possible unique Cryptosporidium hominis transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1537. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sulaiman  IM, Fayer  R, Bern  C, Gilman  RH, Trout  JM, Schantz  PM, Triosephosphate isomerase gene characterization and potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:144452. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng  Y, Wang  L, Duan  L, Gomez-Puerta  LA, Zhang  L, Zhao  X, Extended outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in a pediatric hospital, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:3124. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Peng  MM, Matos  O, Gatei  W, Das  P, Stantic-Pavlinic  M, Bern  C, A comparison of Cryptosporidium subgenotypes from several geographic regions. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2001;48(Suppl):28S31S. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang  R, Zhang  X, Zhu  H, Zhang  L, Feng  Y, Jian  F, Genetic characterizations of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in humans in Henan, China. Exp Parasitol. 2011;127:425. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1810.120653

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 10—October 2012

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Yaoyu Feng, State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, People’s Republic of China

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 14, 2012
Page updated: September 14, 2012
Page reviewed: September 14, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external