Volume 18, Number 12—December 2012
Dispatch
Westward Spread of Echinococcus multilocularis in Foxes, France, 2005–2010
Table 1
Department no., name | Total no. foxes | Prevalence, % (95% CI) | Density of collected foxes, no./100 km2 |
---|---|---|---|
01-Ain | 98 | 20 (13–30) | 1.7 |
02-Aisne | 89 | 20 (13–30) | 1.22 |
08-Ardennes | 91 | 36 (27–47) | 1.85 |
10-Aube | 99 | 12 (7–21) | 1.68 |
14-Calvados | 96 | 14 (8–22) | 1.73 |
15-Cantal* | 97 | 9 (5–17) | 1.68 |
18-Cher | 74 | 1 (0–8) | 1.55 |
21-Cote d'Or | 72 | 21 (12–32) | 0.85 |
25-Doubs* | 113 | 53 (44–62) | 2.21 |
27-Eure | 93 | 0 (0–5) | 1.66 |
28-Eure et Loire | 42 | 0 (0–10) | 0.97 |
36-Indre | 52 | 0 (0–9) | 1.03 |
38-Isere | 89 | 1 (0–7) | 1.2 |
39-Jura* | 102 | 52 (42–62) | 2.02 |
41-Loire et Cher | 86 | 2 (0–9) | 1.47 |
42-Loire | 97 | 1 (0–6) | 2.06 |
45-Loiret | 100 | 0 (0–5) | 1.53 |
50-Manche | 81 | 15 (8–25) | 1.35 |
51-Marne | 103 | 19 (13–29) | 1.26 |
52-Haute Marne | 94 | 14 (8–23) | 1.51 |
54-Meurthe et Moselle* | 84 | 54 (42–64) | 1.8 |
55-Meuse* | 104 | 41 (32–51) | 1.67 |
57-Moselle* | 103 | 34 (25–44) | 1.65 |
58-Nievre | 110 | 1 (0–6) | 1.74 |
59-Nord | 96 | 20 (13–29) | 1.74 |
60-Oise | 87 | 7 (3–15) | 1.53 |
61-Orne | 55 | 4 (1–14) | 0.93 |
62-Pas de Calais | 90 | 0 (0–5) | 1.34 |
67-Bas Rhin* | 7 | 29 (5–70) | 0.44 |
69-Rhone | 48 | 8 (3–21) | 1.69 |
70-Haute Saone* | 81 | 36 (26–47) | 1.54 |
71-Saone et Loire | 79 | 9 (4–18) | 1.13 |
73-Savoie | 75 | 11 (5–20) | 1.26 |
74-Haute Savoie* | 73 | 49 (38–61) | 1.76 |
77-Seine et Marne | 55 | 29 (18–43) | 1 |
80-Somme | 89 | 8 (3–16) | 1.68 |
88-Vosges | 90 | 24 (16–35) | 1.7 |
89-Yonne | 97 | 0 (0–5) | 1.75 |
90-Territoire de Belfort* | 25 | 32 (16–54) | 4.09 |
91-Essonne† | 41 | 7 (2–21) | 2.37 |
93-Seine Saint Denis† | 6 | 17 (1–64) | 2.53 |
95-Val d'Oise† | 44 | 0 (0–10) | 3.59 |
Historical endemic area | 789 | 41 (35–41) | 1.56 |
Total | 3307 | 17 (16–19) | 1.38 |
*Department belonging to the historically echinococcosis-endemic area.
†Department of the Paris capital conurbation (Figure 1).
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: November 20, 2012
Page updated: November 20, 2012
Page reviewed: November 20, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.