Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 3—March 2012

Serologic Evidence of Nipah Virus Infection in Bats, Vietnam

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Bats are potential reservoir for highly pathogenic viruses, such as Nipah virus (NiV) and Hendra virus, which can cross species barriers (1). However, only limited surveillance has been conducted to assess risk for infection by these deadly emerging viruses. We conducted a study in Vietnam from 2007 to 2008 to assess the prevalence of these pathogens in bats.

Different species of live bats were obtained from hunters or were captured in caves, pepper fields, and residential areas by using mist nets or harp traps (Technical Appendix Figure 1). A total of 451 serum samples were collected and subjected to IgG ELISA by using an Escherichia coli–derived recombinant nucleocapsid (N) protein of NiV (NiV-N-ELISA) (2). Two Leschenault’s rousette bats (Rousettus leschenaulti) were vaccinated with the same recombinant N protein to obtain positive serum specimens that contained antibodies against NiV-N. An optical density of 492 nm for negative control serum (1,000× dilution) was designated as 1:1,000 ELISA units. ELISA titers of sample serum specimens were obtained at a single dilution (1,000×) by using a standard curve of positive serum with high titers. A sample titer >3,000 was considered positive for IgG against NiV.

Positive results were detected from only 2 fruit bat species, R. leschenaulti (31 bats [49.1%]) and Cynopterus sphinx (3 bats [2.8%]) (Table). Of the 34 samples positive by ELISA, only 22 (20 from the former and 2 from the latter bat species), which had enough volume left, were further analyzed by Western blot (WB) with E. coli–expressed recombinant N protein of NiV (Table; Technical Appendix Figure 2). Twenty of the 22 specimens were confirmed as positive by WB. ELISA-positive samples with high titers were also positive by WB for both bat species. However, only 1 sample from an R. leschenaulti bat was positive by WB that used a baculovirus-expressed recombinant N protein. Because of the different protein expression systems, the reactivity of bat antibody against NiV protein in WBs showed different patterns (Technical Appendix Figure 2). Neutralization tests (NTs) in which live NiVs (strain Ma-JMR-01–98) were used were performed at the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University. No specimens of C. sphinx bats were positive by NT; however, 2 specimens from R. leschenaulti bats, both positive with low titers, were confirmed to be positive by NT (50% cytopathic effect after NT, titers of 33.6 and 14.1). However, the latter specimen was negative by WB analysis.

Seroepidemiologic studies in other countries have indicated that Pteropus spp. bats (fruit-eating bats) are the main reservoirs for NiV (36). Pteropid bats are usually found only in southern Vietnam. We could not obtain these bats for our study. However, a relatively high prevalence (49.1%) of henipavirus antibody was found in R. leschenaulti specimens from Hoa Binh Province. Rousettus spp. bats are the only megabats that use echolocation. These bats hang together on cave ceilings in a tightly packed manner and in groups composed of bats of both sexes and of different ages. They roost in large colonies and fly vast distances to find fruit (7). This behavior might be related to their high rate of seropositivity for viral infections. In southern China, bats of the same species showed a high prevalence of henipavirus antibody (8). R. leschenaulti bats are distributed from central to northern Vietnam and southern China. C. sphinx bats are common all over Vietnam, and their habitat overlaps with that of pteropid bats in southern Vietnam.

Previous studies showed that IgG ELISA results for NiV-positive flying foxes correlated well with NT results (3,4). However, in our study, discrepancies existed between NT results and NiV-N-ELISA and WB results. A reason for these differences could be that Nipah-like viruses are circulating among bats in Vietnam, producing antibodies that are cross-reactive by ELISA and WB, but poorly cross-reactive by NT. The cross-reactive antibodies were probably not directed against neutralizing epitopes. To date, no reports have been made of an increased number of febrile encephalitis cases among the residents in Hoa Binh and Dak Lak Provinces where seropositive bats were captured. The circulating viruses may lack the pathogenic potential of Hendra and Nipah viruses.

A survey by questionnaire was conducted among residents of Dak Nong and Dak Lak Provinces, where NiV-N-ELISA–positive C. sphinx bats were captured, to determine the frequency of contact between humans and bats. Risk factors for infection were observed in this study, such as bat hunting and cooking and drinking bat blood. In such situations, persons have direct contact with bat body fluids and feces and might be bitten during bat hunting. Thus, long-term systematic surveillance of bats is needed to determine the ecologic relationship between bats, humans, other animals, and the environment.



We thank Vu Dinh Thong for identifying bat species and Corazon Cerilla Buerano for her valuable scientific suggestions.

This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) no. 18659131; Global Center of Excellence program, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan; Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases; and Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd..


Futoshi HasebeComments to Author , Nguyen Thi Thu Thuy, Shingo Inoue, Fuxun Yu, Yoshihiro Kaku, Shumpei Watanabe, Hiroomi Akashi, Dang Tuan Dat, Le Thi Quynh Mai, and Kouichi Morita
Author affiliations: Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan (F. Hasebe, S. Inoue, F. Yu, K. Morita); National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam (N.T.T. Thuy, L.T.Q. Mai); National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan (Y. Kaku); University of Tokyo, Tokyo (S. Watanabe, H. Akashi); Tay Nguyen Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Dak Lak, Vietnam (D.T. Dat)



  1. Calisher  CH, Childs  JE, Field  HE, Holmes  KV, Schountz  T. Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19:53145. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yu  F, Khairullah  NS, Inoue  S, Balasubramaniam  V, Berendam  SJ, Teh  LK, Serodiagnosis using recombinant Nipah virus nucleocapsid protein expressed in Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:31348. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yob  JM, Field  H, Rashdi  AM, Morrissy  C, van der Heide  B, Rota  P, Nipah virus infection in bats (order Chiroptera) in peninsular Malaysia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:43941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Reynes  JM, Counor  D, Ong  S, Faure  C, Seng  V, Molia  S, Nipah virus in Lyle’s flying foxes, Cambodia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:10427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wacharapluesadee  S, Lumlertdacha  B, Boongird  K, Wanghongsa  S, Chanhome  L, Rollin  P, Bat Nipah virus, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:194951. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hsu  VP, Hossain  MJ, Parashar  UD, Ali  MM, Ksiazek  TG, Kuzmin  I, Nipah virus encephalitis reemergence, Bangladesh. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:20827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Altringham  JD, McOwat  T. Bats: biology and behavior. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 1998.
  8. Li  Y, Wang  J, Hickey  AC, Zhang  Y, Li  Y, Wu  Y, Antibodies to Nipah or Nipah-like viruses in bats, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:19746. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1803.111121

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 3—March 2012

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Futoshi Hasebe, Center of International Collaborative Research, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: February 16, 2012
Page updated: February 16, 2012
Page reviewed: February 16, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.