Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 3—March 2012
Letter

Shared Human/Rabbit Ligands for Rabbit Hemorrhagic Disease Virus

On This Page
Article Metrics
1
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) is a calicivirus of the genus Lagovirus that causes epidemics of an acute disease and mortality rates of 50%–90% among rabbits. The disease, which was first described in 1984, is characterized by hemorrhagic lesions, mainly affecting the liver and lungs 24–72 h after infection (1).

Similar to human caliciviruses of the genus Norovirus, RHDV binds to histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs), and we recently showed that HBGAs serve as attachment factors (ligands) that facilitate RHDV infection (2). HBGAs are polymorphic carbohydrate structures representing terminally exposed portions of larger glycans linked to proteins or glycolipids. In many vertebrate species, they are mainly expressed on epithelial surfaces. Because phylogenetic conservation of receptors is a major risk factor for cross-species transmission (3), we analyzed the ability of RHDV strains to recognize human HBGAs expressed on epithelia.

We obtained 38 saliva samples from healthy persons with ABO, Secretor, and Lewis phenotypes, and we selected confirmed FUT2 (secretor) and FUT3 (Lewis) genotypes (4) to include ABO, secretor, and Lewis phenotypic diversity. Binding capacity of 6 RHDV strains representative of virus diversity (2) was tested against human saliva samples by using a method similar to that reported for human norovirus (5).

In brief, saliva samples diluted 1:1,000 or B type 2 bovine serum albumin–conjugated tetrasaccharide (positive control) were coated on ELISA plates. After blocking with milk diluted in phosphate-buffered saline, RHDV strains isolated from whole liver extracts of infected animals were incubated on coated plates at dilutions corresponding to 1 × 109 genome copies (0.2 µg/mL capsid protein equivalent) as determined by Nyström et al. (2). Monoclonal antibody 2G3, biotinylated anti-mouse IgG, and peroxidase-conjugated avidin were used for RHDV detection; 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine was used as a substrate; and optical density values at 450 nm were measured (2).

Binding to the B type 2 epitope was observed for all 6 strains (Technical Appendix Figure, panel A). Human saliva samples were recognized by 5 of 6 RHDV strains. Only G6, an RHDV antigenic variant also known as RHDVa (6), did not show binding to saliva. Strains G1 and G2 showed preferential binding to saliva from B secretors over that from O secretors, and A secretors were poorly recognized. Better recognition of A secretor saliva was obtained with the G3 strain. The G4 and G5 strains showed a clear preference for A secretors over B and O secretors, which indicated a shift in specificity toward recognition of the A antigen from the H and B antigens, as reported (2). None of the strains recognized nonsecretor saliva, which showed that binding to human saliva required A, B, or H motifs. This finding was confirmed by drastically decreased binding after removal of A, B, and H epitopes from secretor saliva by treatment with specific glycosidases. There was no relationship with the Lewis status.

To determine if human epithelial cells were recognized by RHDV, binding of the G3 strain to human tissue sections was assessed. Human trachea, lung, and gastroduodenal junction samples obtained from organ donors (before current French restrictions of December 1988) were used to prepare tissue microarrays. Tissues from 18 persons were used and represented the following phenotypes: O secretor Lewis+ (n = 8), A secretor Lewis+ (n = 3), B secretor Lewis+ (n = 2), O secretor Lewis– (n = 1), and O nonsecretor Lewis+ (n = 4). Deparafinated and endogen peroxidase–blocked sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the G3 strain from an infected liver extract at a concentration of 2 × 109 genome copies/mL.

Binding was detected by using monoclonal antibody 2G3 against RHDV, biotinylated anti-mouse IgG, horseradish peroxidase–conjugated avidin, and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole substrate with hemalum counterstaining, as described (2). Staining of epithelial cells of stomach or trachea of secretors, but not those of nonsecretors, was observed. This finding indicated that attachment factors for RHDV are present on human cells that constitute potential points of entry for RHDV (Technical Appendix Figure, panels B–E).

Attachment to HBGAs of human calicivirus strains represents a first step of the infection process (7). In this study, we have shown that cross-species recognition of HBGAs in cells that may be likely points of entry of RHDV into human cells. RHDV infection has been shown to be rabbit specific (8), which indicates that other molecular elements not shared by rabbits and other mammals restrict its host range. Nevertheless, RHDV RNA was recently isolated from sympatric wild small mammals, which suggested that the species range of RHDV may not be as limited as previously believed (9). In addition, recent phylogenetic analysis showed that caliciviruses exhibit high levels of host switching (10). Therefore, surveillance of RHDV and studies to decipher molecular mechanisms involved in its extreme pathogenicity are warranted.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the cell and tissue imaging core facility of Institut Fédératif de Recherche Thérapeutique de Nantes for preparing tissue microarrays; Ghislaine Le Gall-Reculé, Anses, Ploufragan, Pedro Esteves, and Joana Abrantes for providing whole liver extracts of infected animals; and Lorenzo Capucci for providing monoclonal antibody 2G3.

This study was supported by a grant from the Région des Pays de la Loire Calilago and by the Fédération Nationale des Chasseurs.

Top

Kristina Nyström, Béatrice Le Moullac-Vaidye, Nathalie Ruvoën-Clouet, and Jacques Le PenduComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Nantes, France; University of Nantes, Nantes

Top

References

  1. Abrantes  J, van der Loo  W, Le Pendu  J, Esteves  PJ. Rabbit haemorrhagic disease (RHD) and rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV): a review. Vet Res. 2012. In press.
  2. Nyström  K, Le Gall-Recule  G, Grassi  P, Abrantes  J, Ruvoën-Clouet  N, Le Moullac-Vaidye  B, Histo-blood group antigens act as attachment factors of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus infection in a virus strain-dependent manner. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002188. DOIPubMed
  3. Woolhouse  MEJ, Haydon  DT, Antia  R. Emerging pathogens: the epidemiology and evolution of species jump. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005;20:23844. DOIPubMed
  4. Azevedo  M, Eriksson  S, Mendes  N, Serpa  J, Figueiredo  C, Resende  LP, Infection by Helicobacter pylori expressing the BabA adhesin is influenced by the secretor phenotype. J Pathol. 2008;215:30816. DOIPubMed
  5. de Rougemont  A, Ruvoën-Clouet  N, Simon  B, Estienney  M, Elie-Caille  C, Aho  S, Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the binding of GII.4 norovirus variants onto human blood group antigens. J Virol. 2011;85:405770. DOIPubMed
  6. Capucci  L, Fallacara  F, Grazioli  S, Lavazza  A, Pacciarini  ML, Brocchi  E. A further step in the evolution of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus: the appearance of the first consistent antigenic variant. Virus Res. 1998;58:11526. DOIPubMed
  7. Tan  M, Jiang  X. Norovirus-host interaction: multi-selections by human histo-blood group antigens. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19:3828. DOIPubMed
  8. Gould  AR, Kattenbelt  JA, Lenghaus  C, Morrissy  C, Chamberlain  T, Collins  BJ, The complete nucleotide sequence of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (Czech strain V351): use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect replication in Australian vertebrates and analysis of viral population sequence variation. Virus Res. 1997;47:717. DOIPubMed
  9. Merchán  T, Rocha  G, Alda  F, Silva  E, Thompson  G, de Trucios  SH, Detection of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) in nonspecific vertebrate hosts sympatric to the European wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Infect Genet Evol. 2011;11:146974. DOIPubMed
  10. Kitchen  A, Shackelton  LA, Holmes  EC. Family level phylogenies reveal modes of macroevolution in RNA viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:23843. DOIPubMed

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1803.111402

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 3—March 2012

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jacques Le Pendu, Unité 892, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 8 quai Moncousu, BP 70721, 44007 Nantes Cedex 1, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: February 16, 2012
Page updated: February 16, 2012
Page reviewed: February 16, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external