Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 6—June 2012

Rickettsia parkeri Infection in Domestic Dogs, Southern Louisiana, USA, 2011

Britton J. Grasperge, Wendy Wolfson, and Kevin R. Macaluso
Author affiliations: Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

Cite This Article


The association between companion animals and tick-borne rickettsial disease has long been recognized and can be essential to the emergence of rickettsioses. We tested whole blood from dogs in temporary shelters by using PCR for rickettsial infections. Of 93 dogs, 12 (13%) were positive for Rickettsia parkeri, an emerging tick-borne rickettsiosis.

Tick-borne spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsioses are maintained in tick populations through vertical transmission of the rickettsial agent and horizontal transmission among vectors by a vertebrate host. Companion animals, specifically dogs, can serve as vertebrate hosts for arthropod vectors and SFG rickettsia (1), as shown by a report of a Rickettsia parkeri–infected dog in South America (2). Likewise, cases of rickettsioses in humans have been associated with cases in companion animals (3). Because of a substantial increase in tick-borne rickettsial diseases in the past decade, much effort has been directed to identifying the rickettsial agents present in ticks (4). On the basis of findings from field surveys of rickettsial infections in ticks and characterization of rickettsioses in humans, most cases of what is considered Rocky Mountain spotted fever, a disease caused by R. rickettsii, are likely caused by infections with rickettsial species other than R. rickettsii (5).

One of the better documented emerging rickettsial pathogens is R. parkeri, an SFG tick-borne rickettsial disease associated with Gulf Coast ticks (Amblyomma maculatum) (6) and commonly identified in the coastal states of the southeastern United States. We investigated the potential role domestic dogs play in the ecology of R. parkeri transmission to better understand the epidemiologic landscape of this emerging rickettsiosis.

The Study

We obtained blood from dogs at 5 animal control centers in 5 parishes in southern Louisiana during June and July 2011. The blood for the study was provided from excess samples collected for routine heartworm screening. In total, 93 dogs were included in the study. Within 12 hours of collection, whole blood samples (≈50–100 μL) were processed individually for DNA extraction by using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). DNA was stored at –20°C until PCR analysis.

DNA extracts from the collected blood, environmental DNA extraction controls, or water (negative controls) were used as template for PCR. PCR products were amplified by using genus-specific 17-kDa antigen gene primers and described thermocycling conditions (7). Amplicons were visualized by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. Positive samples were excised from the gels, and the amplicons were purified by using the PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Positive samples were sequenced, and sequences were aligned by using MEGA5.05 (, and nucleotide similarities were assessed by using the GenBank BLAST database (

DNA samples positive for Rickettsia spp. by the genus-specific 17-kDa antigen gene primers were also assessed for the SFG-common rickettsial outer membrane protein A gene (rompA) by using a heminested PCR with primers 190.70p and 190.701 followed by primers 190.70p and 190.602n. Primers and thermocycling conditions for the heminested PCR were as described (7), and subsequent purification and sequencing were performed as described above.

Of the 93 DNA samples, 12 (≈13%) produced positive amplicons for the genus-specific 17-kDa antigen gene. On the basis of sequence data, the positive samples were determined to be most closely related to SFG rickettsiae. The resulting 315-bp sequence showed 100% identity to R. montanensis (GenBank accession no. DQ402377.1) and 99% identity to several other members of the SFG including R. rickettsii, R. parkeri, Candidatus Rickettsia andeanae, and R. sibirica (GenBank accession nos. CP000766.2, EF689732.1, GU395295.1, and AF445384.1, respectively).

The heminested PCR for rompA yielded a 491-bp product with identical sequences for each of the 12 Rickettsia-positive samples. Sequence analysis of the rompA amplicon identified a 99% similarity with several different strains of R. parkeri (GenBank accession nos. U43802.1, EU715288.1, EF102238.1, FJ172358.1, and HM587252.1). These Rickettsia-positive samples were obtained from 3 of the 5 sites surveyed, and 2 of the 3 sites were in parishes that directly adjoined each other (Table). Within the dog populations tested in the 3 sites, 22% (2/9), 16% (9/55), and 8% (1/12), respectively, of the dogs were infected with R. parkeri (Table).

None of the 12 dogs with PCR-positive tests were infested with ticks at the time of sampling. Six female dogs and 6 male dogs had detectable levels of R. parkeri DNA in their blood. Nine of the 12 dogs were adults; 3 were <6 months of age. Many of the dogs in the study were classified as mixed breed because breed could not be objectively determined for most of the animals. All animals appeared to be in good health; no overt pathology was noted at the time of blood collection.

Although molecular detection of rickettsial DNA within the blood of vertebrates indicates infection, rickettsial cultures from the positive samples would confirm patent rickettsemia. Most of the samples in our study were insufficient in volume to attempt culture after heartworm testing and DNA extraction. Of the 12 samples with PCR results positive for rickettsial DNA, only 3 were of sufficient volume to attempt culture, and all of those attempts proved unsuccessful. It would also have been beneficial to determine if dogs that were positive for R. parkeri harbored ticks that were also positive for R. parkeri. However, it is common practice for animal control centers to treat dogs for ectoparasites on admission; thus, no ticks were present on the dogs in our study at the time of sampling. The presence of rickettsial DNA in the blood of dogs, in the absence of ectoparasites, supports the hypothesis that domestic canines may serve as reservoirs of rickettsial diseases, now specifically including the emerging pathogen R. parkeri.


We examined the potential role of domestic dogs in transmission of SFG Rickettsia. R. rickettsii, the causative agent of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, is known to cause clinical disease in dogs, and it is associated with signs and symptoms that are similar to human disease, including cutaneous petechiae and ecchymoses, anorexia, depression, weight loss, and dehydration (8). The role of dogs as vehicles for Rickettsia-infected ticks to encounter susceptible humans has also been proposed (1). The possibility of dogs as reservoirs of rickettsial disease has previously been investigated in studies evaluating R. felis rickettsemia and seropositivity for R. parkeri (9,10); however, strong cross-reaction among antibodies precludes finding of definitive results from serologic testing. The current study suggests that domestic dogs may become rickettsemic with R. parkeri infection, but further investigation of the duration of rickettsemia and monitoring for clinical disease that may be associated with infection is required.

It is also vital to determine the potential for dogs to serve as infectious sources of R. parkeri for feeding ticks. Dogs infected with R. rickettsii, for example, have proven relatively inefficient at transmitting rickettsiae to naive ticks and therefore may not play a large role in maintenance or amplification of the R. rickettsii transmission cycle (11). Conversely, domestic dogs have recently been shown to be competent reservoirs for the causative agent of Mediterranean spotted fever, R. conorii, a species closely related to R. parkeri (12). The prevalence identified in this study establishes an important first step in the examination of the domestic dog for reservoir competency of R. parkeri.

Since the first reported case of R. parkeri rickettsiosis in 2004, >20 additional cases have been identified in humans (13), and to date no viable vertebrate reservoirs for the pathogen have been identified. Although the current study consists of a relatively small survey, the results are considerable because of the recognized importance of domestic dogs as potential reservoirs for transmissible pathogens (14). In addition, the presence of R. parkeri has not previously been described in Louisiana; thus, this report expands the known distribution of R. parkeri. The results of the current study clearly establish dog infection by R. parkeri; however, a role for dogs in the natural cycle of this pathogen, and the arthropod vectors involved in transmission, requires further investigation.

Dr Grasperge is a veterinary clinical pathologist and predoctoral candidate in the Vector Biology Research Laboratory at Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine. His work focuses on the pathogenesis of eschar-associated rickettsioses.



This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grant 5R01AI077784.



  1. McQuiston  JH, Guerra  MA, Watts  MR, Lawaczeck  E, Levy  C, Nicholson  WL, Evidence of exposure to spotted fever group rickettsiae among Arizona dogs outside previously documented outbreak area. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58:8592. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tomassone  L, Conte  V, Parrilla  G. Rickettsia infection in dogs and Rickettsia parkeri in Amblyomma tigrinum ticks, Cochabamba Department, Bolivia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10:9538. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Breitschwerdt  EB, Meuten  DJ, Walker  DH, Levy  M, Kennedy  K, King  M, Canine Rocky Mountain spotted fever: a kennel epizootic. Am J Vet Res. 1985;46:21248.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dumler  JS. Fitness and freezing: vector biology and human health. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:308790. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stromdahl  EY, Jiang  J, Vince  M, Richards  AL. Infrequency of Rickettsia rickettsii in Dermacentor variabilis removed from humans, with comments on the role of other human-biting ticks associated with spotted fever group rickettsiae in the United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:96977. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Paddock  CD, Sumner  JW, Comer  JA, Zaki  SR, Goldsmith  CS, Goddard  J, Rickettsia parkeri: a newly recognized cause of spotted fever rickettsiosis in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:80511. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pornwiroon  W, Pourciau  SS, Foil  LD, Macaluso  KR. Rickettsia felis from cat fleas: isolation and culture in a tick-derived cell line. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:558995. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Breitschwerdt  EB, Walker  DH, Levy  MG, Burgdorfer  W, Corbett  WT, Hurlbert  SA, Clinical, hematologic, and humoral immune response in female dogs inoculated with Rickettsia rickettsii and Rickettsia montana. Am J Vet Res. 1988;49:706.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hii  SF, Kopp  SR, Abdad  MY, Thompson  MF, O’Leary  CA, Rees  RL, Molecular evidence supports the role of dogs as potential reservoirs for Rickettsia felis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:100712. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Toledo  RS, Tamekuni  K, Filho  MF, Haydu  VB, Barbieri  AR, Hiltel  AC, Infection by spotted fever rickettsiae in people, dogs, horses and ticks in Londrina, Parana State, Brazil. Zoonoses Public Health. 2011;58:41623. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Norment  BR, Burgdorfer  W. Susceptibility and reservoir potential of the dog to spotted fever-group rickettsiae. Am J Vet Res. 1984;45:170610.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Levin  ML, Killmaster  LF, Zemtsova  GE. Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as reservoir for Rickettsia conorii. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:2833. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Paddock  CD, Fournier  PE, Sumner  JW, Goddard  J, Elshenawy  Y, Metcalfe  MG, Isolation of Rickettsia parkeri and identification of a novel spotted fever group Rickettsia sp. From Gulf Coast ticks (Amblyomma maculatum) in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:268996. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chomel  B. Tick-borne infections in dogs-an emerging infectious threat. Vet Parasitol. 2011;179:294301. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1806.120165

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 6—June 2012

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.


Page created: May 10, 2012
Page updated: May 10, 2012
Page reviewed: May 10, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.