Volume 18, Number 7—July 2012
Dispatch
Timeliness of Nongovernmental versus Governmental Global Outbreak Communications
Table 2
Variable | IRR (95% CI) | p value |
---|---|---|
Source | ||
Governmental | Ref | |
Nongovernmental | 0.950 (0.765–1.180) | 0.645 |
Chronological order | ||
Pre-SARS | Ref | |
Post-SARS | 0.713 (0.576–0.884) | 0.002 |
Geographic location | ||
Africa | Ref | |
Americas | 0.773 (0.531–1.126) | 0.180 |
Eastern Mediterranean | 0.912 (0.654–1.272) | 0.587 |
Europe | 1.100 (0.731–1.669) | 0.637 |
Southeast Asia | 0.602 (0.394–0.918) | 0.019 |
Western Pacific | 0.780 (0.577–1.054) | 0.106 |
*Methods: The multivariate negative binomial regression model compared the timeliness of outbreaks first communicated by nongovernmental sources to those by governmental sources, while adjusting for geographic region and whether the outbreak occurred before or after public recognition of SARS. IRR, incidence rate ratio; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; ref, reference value = 1. Reference categories: (1) source: governmental, (2) SARS: pre-SARS, (3) geographic region: Africa.
Page created: June 12, 2012
Page updated: June 12, 2012
Page reviewed: June 12, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.