Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 9—September 2012
Dispatch

Francisella tularensis Subspecies holarctica, Tasmania, Australia, 2011

Figures
Article Metrics
54
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia (J. Jackson, A.R. McGregor, L. Cooley, C.W. Ong, C. Darcy); Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (J. Ng, M. Brown, V. Sintchenko); and The University of Sydney, Sydney (V. Sintchenko)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We report a case of ulceroglandular tularemia that developed in a woman after she was bitten by a ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) in a forest in Tasmania, Australia. Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica was identified. This case indicates the emergence of F. tularensis type B in the Southern Hemisphere.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) as photographed by its bite victim, Tasmania, Australia, 2011.

Figure 1. . Ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) as photographed by its bite victim, Tasmania, Australia, 2011.

Tularemia is a zoonosis affecting a wide range of wildlife species, including mammals, birds, amphibians, and arthropods (1,2). Three subspecies of Francisella tularensis have been recognized as causes of disease in humans: ssp. tularensis (type A tularemia), ssp. holarctica (type B tularemia), and ssp. novicida. Type B tularemia is endemic to the Northern Hemisphere, and cases predominately occur in latitudes 30°N–71°N (1,2). We report a case of ulceroglandular tularemia in a human in Tasmania, Australia (latitude 42°S) who was bitten by a ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus, Figure 1).

The Case

In February 2011, a 44-year-old woman was bitten on her right index finger by a wild ringtail possum near the Henty River on the western coast of Tasmania. The incident occurred in daylight, and the possum, normally nocturnal, appeared lethargic and unwell. The patient was immunocompetent and had never traveled outside of Australia. Three days later, an ulcer developed at the site of the bite, followed by the development of swollen and tender epitrochlear lymph nodes, fever, rigors, myalgias, and drenching night sweats. On day 4, the patient was prescribed oral β-lactam antimicrobial drugs by her local doctor. She took these for 2 weeks without clinical improvement. Axillary lymphadenopathy was palpable on day 14, and by day 17 the epitrochlear nodes had formed a spontaneously discharging sinus. A swab sample was collected from the primary ulcer site on day 17. No organisms grew after a 48-h incubation at 36°C in the following culture media: blood agar in ambient air, MacConkey agar in ambient air, and chocolate agar in 5% CO2. The patient’s antimicrobial drug regimen was altered empirically to ciprofloxacin 500 mg 2×/day and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875 mg/125 mg 2×/day for the next 4 weeks. Despite mild improvement in symptoms, epitrochlear and axillary lymphadenitis with suppuration persisted. Swab samples collected for fungal and mycobacterial culture from the epitrochlear sinus on day 30 were culture negative. On day 47, the patient was referred to the Royal Hobart Hospital in Tasmania. Histology from an excisional biopsy of the epitrochlear sinus on day 50 revealed acute inflammation and a few non-necrotizing epithelioid granulomas. This tissue and an axillary lymph node aspirate were sent to a reference laboratory for molecular studies.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Nucleotide sequence comparison of the recA (A) and 16S rRNA (B) genes of Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica, Tasmania, Australia, 2011. Reference sequences from the GenBank/European Molecular Biology Laboratory/DNA DataBank of Japan databases and 16S rRNA gene sequences from an F. novicida and an F. philomiragia infection reported from Australia (4) were aligned with amplicons of 16S rRNA and recA genes from samples with PCR results positive for F. tularensis from a 44-yea

Figure 2. . Nucleotide sequence comparison of the recA (A) and 16S rRNA (B) genes of Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica, Tasmania, Australia, 2011. Reference sequences from the GenBank/European Molecular Biology Laboratory/DNA DataBank of...

In the reference laboratory, the 16S rRNA gene was amplified from the axillary aspirate by using primers targeting the U1, U3, and U5 regions. The resulting 1,331-bp amplicon (GenBank accession no. JQ277265) demonstrated 100% homology with 16S rRNA gene sequences from F. tularensis ssp. tularensis and holarctica stored in GenBank. PCR and sequencing of the recA gene (3) confirmed F. tularensis (GenBank accession no. JQ277266). Amplicons of 16S rRNA and recA genes were aligned with reference sequences from the GenBank/European Molecular Biology Laboratory/DNA DataBank of Japan databases and with sequences from 2 previous Francisella spp. reported from Australia (4). The 16S rRNA and recA gene sequences showed 100% query coverage and an Expect value of 0.00 in BLASTn (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) with 36 submissions of F. tularensis genomes (Figure 2). The unrooted bootstrap consensus tree generated from sequence alignment of the recA gene sequence, coupled with the neighbor-joining method, suggested homology between F. tularensis ssp. holarctica and the organism responsible for this patient’s illness. Sequencing of the region of difference 1 (5) by using previously validated primers (3) indicated the region of difference 1 size was 835 bp, closely approximating the 840-bp size associated with F. tularensis ssp. holarctica biovar japonica.

Lymph node aspirate from the patient cultured in horse blood and in blood cysteine and chocolate media with and without supplement (BBL IsoVitaleX Enrichment; Becton, Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD, USA) produced no growth after 2 weeks of incubation (37°C, 5% CO2); the control strain of F. tularensis live vaccine strain grew within 3 days. We used reagents and protocols from the Laboratory Response Network, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to perform real-time PCR for F. tularensis. The procedure amplified 2 of 3 targets (FT2 and FT3). IgG and IgM against F. tularensis antigens were detected by use of ELISA (Virion-Serion, Würzburg, Germany) in serum obtained 2 months after the onset of symptoms in concentrations of 147.13 and 222.74 U/mL, respectively (positive cutoff >15 U/mL). Confirmatory serology for F. tularensis was performed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention vector-borne diseases laboratory (Fort Collins, CO, USA) on serum samples collected 56 and 75 days after symptom onset. Both specimens were positive for F. tularensis, evidenced by a microagglutination titer of 128 (positive cutoff >128). On the basis of these results, the patient was treated with a 14-day course of intravenous gentamicin. Her symptoms resolved promptly, and the woman remained well at a 6-month follow-up visit.

This case demonstrates the well-recognized features of F. tularensis ssp. holarctica infection as described from the Northern Hemisphere. The mode of transmission, incubation period, clinical syndrome, lack of response to β-lactam antimicrobial drugs, and response to aminoglycoside therapy are all characteristic of type B tularemia (6). Although a clinical response to ciprofloxacin could have been expected, treatment failures have been reported when initiation of therapy is delayed (7). The lack of growth on blood and chocolate agar is also consistent with ssp. holarctica and contrasts with ssp. novicida and F. philomiragia (4,6). The inability to culture an organism on specialized media probably was caused by prolonged ciprofloxacin treatment before the specific culture attempt. This case met the definition for probable tularemia according to the 2007 World Health Organization guidelines (8); however, the combination of clinical, serologic, and molecular evidence strongly supports the diagnosis of infection with F. tularensis ssp. holarctica. This conclusion is consistent with recent reports of tularemia in which case definitions included a compatible clinical syndrome and positive F. tularensis real-time PCR or DNA sequencing (9,10).

Cases of human infection with other Francisella species have been reported from Australia (4). F. philomiragia was isolated from a lymph node in a child in Victoria with chronic granulomatous disease, and a novicida-like organism was cultured from the toe of a 53-year-old man after a cut received in brackish water in the Northern Territory. In contrast to type A and B tularemia, these organisms are rare human pathogens and are not associated with arthropod vectors or animal hosts.

More than 300 species of mammals, birds, invertebrates, and amphibians are currently recognized as being susceptible to type B tularemia (1). This report adds the ringtail possum, found widely throughout Australia, to the list of species that are susceptible to tularemia and have transmitted this pathogen to humans. Although transmission of tularemia is most often associated with species from the orders Lagomorpha and Rodentia, human infection following contact with marsupials has long been recognized. Within the United States, opossum-to-human transmission was described as early as 1929 (11).

The discovery of F. tularensis in this remote location of Australia raises questions about possible routes of spread and natural reservoirs of tularemia. Tularemia has emerged several times in nonendemic areas after the importation of infected wildlife (12) or changes in ecologic and climate conditions (13), or in settings of postwar social disruption (14); but no such recent events have occurred in Tasmania. An alternate possibility is introduction of tularemia to Australia by water birds migrating from Southeast Asia that, if infected, have the potential to contaminate surface waters with F. tularensis (15).

Conclusions

This case provides evidence of type B tularemia in Australia and should alert physicians and veterinarians working within the region to the possibility of infection with this organism. The transmission of F. tularensis to a human host after the bite of an animal native to Australia suggests an ecologic niche for this bacterium in the forests of western Tasmania. Further research is necessary to elucidate the role that ringtail possums, small mammals, ticks, tabanid flies, and mosquitoes prevalent in this unique location might play as natural reservoirs for and vectors of F. tularensis.

Dr Jackson is an infectious diseases registrar working at the Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania. His research focus is on infectious diseases endemic to Australasia.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Greg James, Neisha Joeffreys, Trang Nguyen, and Marion Yuen for their assistance in laboratory testing. We gratefully acknowledge Martin Schriefer for providing and interpreting serologic testing.

Top

References

  1. Keim  P, Johansson  A, Wagner  DM. Molecular epidemiology, evolution, and ecology of Francisella. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1105:3066. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hopla  CE. The ecology of tularemia. Adv Vet Sci Comp Med. 1974;18:2553.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Huber  B, Escudero  R, Busse  H-J, Seibold  E, Scholz  HC, Anda  P, Description of Francisella hispaniensis sp. nov., isolated from human blood, reclassification of Francisella novicida (Larson et al. 1955) Olsufiev et al. 1959 as Francisella tularensis subsp. novicida comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Francisella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:188796. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Whipp  MJ, Davis  JM, Lum  G, de Boer  J, Zhou  Y, Bearden  SW, Characterization of a novicida-like subspecies of Francisella tularensis isolated in Australia. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:83942. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Broekhuijsen  M, Larsson  P, Johansson  A, Byström  M, Eriksson  U, Larsson  E, Genome-wide DNA microarray analysis of Francisella tularensis strains demonstrates extensive genetic conservation within the species but identifies regions that are unique to the highly virulent F. tularensis subsp. tularensis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:292431. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Petersen  JM, Schriefer  ME, Araj  GF. Francisella and Brucella. In: Versalovic J, editor. Manual of clinical microbiology. 10th ed. Vol. 1. Washington (DC): ASM Press; 2011. p. 751–69.
  7. Johansson  A, Berglund  L, Sjöstedt  A, Tärnvik  A. Ciprofloxacin for treatment of tularemia. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:2678. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on tularaemia. Geneva: The Organization; 2007 [cited 2012 Jun 29] http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/WHO_CDS_EPR_2007_7.pdf
  9. Maurin  M, Pelloux  I, Brion  JP, Del Banõ  JN, Picard  A. Human tularemia in France, 2006–2010. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:e13341. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuroda  M, Sekizuka  T, Shinya  F, Takeuchi  F, Kanno  T, Sata  T, Detection of a possible bioterrorism agent, Francisella sp, in a clinical specimen by use of next-generation direct DNA sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:18102. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mease  JA. Tularemia from opossums. JAMA. 1929;92:1042. DOIGoogle Scholar
  12. Pérez-Castrillón  JL, Bachiller-Luque  P, Martín-Luquero  M, Mena-Martín  FJ, Herreros  V. Tularemia epidemic in northwestern Spain: clinical description and therapeutic response. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:5736. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Akalın  H, Helvacı  S, Gedikoğlu  S. Re-emergence of tularemia in Turkey. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:54751. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Reintjes  R, Dedushaj  I, Gjini  A, Jorgensen  TR, Cotter  B, Lieftucht  A, Tularemia outbreak investigation in Kosovo: case control and environmental studies. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:6973. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cabelli  VJ, Hodapp  FA, Ferguson  EW, Peacock  M. Tularemia: potential for transmission by birds. Zoonoses Res. 1964;3:99124.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1809.111856

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 9—September 2012

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Vitali Sintchenko, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney NSW, 2145, Australia

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 27, 2012
Page updated: August 27, 2012
Page reviewed: August 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external