Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 2—February 2013

Yersinia pestis Plasminogen Activator Gene Homolog in Rat Tissues

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Yersinia pestis causes plague, which primarily affects rodents, but is an invasive and virulent pathogen among humans. Y. pestis infection is endemic in small rodent populations in different parts of the world, and the bacterium is considered a potential bioweapon because it can be easily isolated, produced, dried, and dispersed as an aerosol. Antimicrobial drug treatment can be lifesaving during the early stages of illness; hence, rapid and sensitive methods for Y. pestis detection in environmental and clinical samples are required. Multiple PCR assays for Y. pestis detection that primarily detect markers located on plasmids have been developed (16). The plasminogen activator/coagulase (pla) gene, located on plasmid pPCP1, is incorporated into most Y. pestis PCR assays, and in several studies it was the prime or sole marker (1,2,5,79). Reasons for including pla in these assays are its occurrence in multiple copies, its absence from closely related Yersinia species, and its role in Y. pestis virulence (1,4,5).

While validating the specificity of a multiplex qPCR assay for the detection of Y. pestis (6), we obtained DNA from the dissected peritoneum of a black laboratory rat (Rattus rattus), which tested positive for the pla gene. Two other Y. pestis signature sequences were not amplified. Additional samples were analyzed from black (n = 11) and brown (Rattus norvegicus [n = 4]) rats that had been caught on poultry and pig farms in the southeastern region of the Netherlands during 2008. Positive indicators for pla were found in samples from 8 of these black rats and in samples from 2 of the brown rats. Samples from 2 laboratory rats tested negative for pla. Inferences of the incidence of pla-positive rats cannot be made because of low sample numbers and potential bias in capturing rats that had putative infections.

To exclude the possibility of contamination of host DNA with DNA from intestinal flora during isolation of the peritoneum, we examined the occurrence of pla in other tissues. Lung and liver samples were available from all 17 rats, and leg tissue samples were available from 7 rats, 5 of which had positive peritoneal tissue test results. The leg and lung tissues of 1 rat and the leg tissue of another rat tested positive, albeit at considerably lower quantities (higher quantification cycles) than pla values measured in peritoneal samples. These results did not support the likelihood of contamination during sampling or the occurrence of local infections; they did support the hypothesis of a systemic infection in the rats. To investigate whether the presence of the pla gene sequences indicated the presence of the carrier pPCP1 plasmid in Y. pestis, we designed PCR assays for the amplification of 3 conserved regions of this plasmid (Technical Appendix). Each assay produced PCR products from Y. pestis; only the transposase gene was amplified from Y. pseudotuberculosis. None of the PCR assays amplified DNA from samples collected from rats.

Pla genes obtained from 2 of the peritoneum samples collected from black rats were sequenced and appeared to be identical (GenBank accession no. HQ606074). Alignment with Y. pestis pla genes, which are highly conserved among Y. pestis isolates, revealed 11 nt differences in 880 bp (98.8% similarity). A BLAST ( search retrieved such highly similar genes only from Y. pestis sequences; the next most similar sequences of other Enterobacteriaceae were at 78% similarity.

The genewalking PCR procedure was used to explore sequences adjacent to the pla gene (Technical Appendix). One PCR product was sequenced and appeared to be in part homologous to the pla gene, but the adjacent sequence displayed high homology to genes coding for replicon (rep) proteins in several bacterial genera in the family Enterobacteriaceae, e.g., Escherichia, Shigella, and Salmonella. The existence of a concatenated pla-rep sequence in rat tissue samples was confirmed by amplification of a PCR product from a primer targeting the pla gene, combined with a primer targeting the rep gene sequence that was acquired by using the genewalking procedure. The resulting 223-bp PCR product (GenBank accession no. JQ756394) consisted of a 141-bp sequence identical to the Y. pestis pla gene, linked to a 72-bp sequence that was 97% similar to enterobacterial rep protein genes. Attempts to obtain more sequence information from rep sequences by using primers derived from conserved domains in enterobacterial rep genes were unsuccessful. This suggests that the pla-rep sequence is derived from uncharacterized bacteria. Rep proteins function as replication activators of their carrier plasmids.

The rep sequences identified in this study were most similar to those of plasmids involved in bactericidal activity, a function that is also ascribed to the bacteriocin pesticin gene clusters of Y. pestis pPCP1 plasmids. The occurrence in unknown organisms that have pla genes that are similar to Y. pestis pla genes has consequences for the detection of Y. pestis. To prevent false positive results, detection protocols should include at least 1 supplemental target to confirm the presence of Y. pestis (6). In addition, investigators using pla gene analysis, for instance, while reconstructing ancient plague epidemics (10), should be aware of the occurrence of these homologs.


Ingmar JanseComments to Author , Raditijo A. Hamidjaja, and Chantal Reusken
Author affiliations: Author affiliation: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands



  1. Loïez  C, Herwegh  S, Wallet  F, Armand  S, Guinet  F, Courcol  RJ. Detection of Yersinia pestis in sputum by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:48735. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Skottman  T, Piiparinen  H, Hyytiäinen  H, Myllys  V, Skurnik  M, Nikkari  S. Simultaneous real-time PCR detection of Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26:20711. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Stewart  A, Satterfield  B, Cohen  M, O'Neill  K, Robison  R. A quadruplex real-time PCR assay for the detection of Yersinia pestis and its plasmids. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:32431. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tomaso  H, Reisinger  EC, Al Dahouk  S, Frangoulidis  D, Rakin  A, Landt  O, Rapid detection of Yersinia pestis with multiplex real-time PCR assays using fluorescent hybridisation probes. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38:11726. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Higgins  JA, Ezzell  J, Hinnebusch  BJ, Shipley  M, Henchal  EA, Ibrahim  MS. 5′ nuclease PCR assay to detect Yersinia pestis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:22848 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Janse  I, Hamidjaja  RA, Bok  JM, van Rotterdam  BJ. Reliable detection of Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis by using multiplex qPCR including internal controls for nucleic acid extraction and amplification. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:314 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Adjemian  JZ, Adjemian  MK, Foley  P, Chomel  BB, Kasten  RW, Foley  JE. Evidence of multiple zoonotic agents in a wild rodent community in the eastern Sierra Nevada. J Wildl Dis. 2008;44:73742 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Matero  P, Hemmila  H, Tomaso  H, Piiparinen  H, Rantakokko-Jalava  K, Nuotio  L, Rapid field detection assays for Bacillus anthracis, Brucella spp., Francisella tularensis and Yersinia pestis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:3443 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Riehm  JM, Tserennorov  D, Kiefer  D, Stuermer  IW, Tomaso  H, Zoller  L, Yersinia pestis in small rodents, Mongolia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:13202. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Drancourt  M, Aboudharam  G, Signoli  M, Dutour  O, Raoult  D. Detection of 400-year-old Yersinia pestis DNA in human dental pulp: an approach to the diagnosis of ancient septicemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1263740. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1902.120659

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 2—February 2013

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Ingmar Janse, Laboratory for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Anthonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: January 22, 2013
Page updated: January 22, 2013
Page reviewed: January 22, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.