Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 2—February 2013

Tropheryma whipplei Genotypes 1 and 3, Central Europe

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Tropheryma whipplei causes Whipple disease, a rare multisystemic disorder that affects mainly middle-aged white men and is most widely distributedin Europe and North America (1). In the general population of France, T. whipplei DNA was found in 2%–4% of stool samples and T. whipplei–specific antibodies were found in 51% of serum samples (2). Still, the prevalence of classic Whipple disease, which causes arthralgia, diarrhea, and weight loss, remains extremely low (1). Whipple disease has 4 known manifestations: 1) classic Whipple disease; 2) focused chronic infections, mainly endocarditis; 3) acute infections, such as gastroenteritis, bacteremia, and pneumonia; and 4) asymptomatic T. whipplei carriage in healthy persons (15). T. whipplei is thought to be transmitted through oral and oro–fecal routes by human-to-human contact (2,6).

The pathogen was cultivated in 2000, and 2 genomes were sequenced (reference strains Twist and TW08/27) (7,8). These events made possible a genotyping system based on 4 highly variable genetic sequences found by genome comparison (TW133, ProS, SecA, Pro184) (9). Since 2007, we have applied this system to patient samples positive for T. whipplei from central Europe and sub-Saharan Africa (2,3,9,10). The system showed a higher discriminatory power than previous typing methods and improved the genotyping resolution of T. whipplei, promoting better understanding of its epidemiology on the molecular level (9).

Since 2003, we have subcultured strain Twist every 3 weeks. In 2007 and 2012, we compared sequences for the subcultured strains with that for the 2003 strain. We found that the spacer sequence remained stable over the ≈10-year period. This finding suggests a high intrastrain genetic stability and highlights the value of the typing system, which is stable. Thus, a change in genotype in a patient with Whipple disease must be interpreted as an infection with a different strain and cannot be attributed to mutation of the original strain.

To date, 191 samples positive for T. whipplei collected from patients from central Europe (France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, and Italy) have been typed, revealing a genetic diversity by identifying 72 different T. whipplei genotypes: 1–23, 25–45, 58–60, 76–77, 82–102, and 111–116. The discriminatory power was high (Hunter-Gaston discriminatory index 0.9298) for all samples from Europe. No connection between clinical manifestations and T. whipplei genotypes has been described. Reasons might be found either in an unknown link between genomics in T. whipplei and clinical outcome or might be because the typing system cannot identify possible virulence factors. Genotypes 1 and 3 are predominant (1,3), accounting for 35.1% of all tested T. whipplei samples from Europe.


Thumbnail of Geographic distribution of the 2 most common genotypes of Tropheryma whipplei in central Europe. Numbers in circles indicate number of cases with corresponding genotype; circles without a number indicate single cases. Cities are either the residence of patients or of their physicians; the capital of the country of residence is shown for persons whose city of residence was unknown. This map was made by using Epi Info 7 (

Figure. . Geographic distribution of the 2 most common genotypes of Tropheryma whipplei in central Europe. Numbers in circles indicate number of cases with corresponding genotype; circles without a number indicate single...

Genotype 3 is the most common T. whipplei genotype in Europe (19.9% of all samples) and could be considered epidemic in and specific to France, Switzerland, and Italy. This genotype was proposed to be responsible for small outbreaks caused by clonal strains, such as gastroenteritis among young children or the strain carried by homeless persons in Marseille, France (3,6), but it has not been described in Germany or Austria (Figure).

Genotype 1 is found throughout central Europe and is the second most common genotype (15.2% of all samples) (Figure). Predominance of this genotype in Germany is high (46.2%, n = 13) and Austria (80%, n = 5). Infection with this genotype seems to be endemic in the population of the area, although no outbreaks have been reported.

Of 191samples, a total of 55 (28.8%) showed a unique genotype consistent with the high genetic variability in T. whipplei specimens. Phylogenetic analysis and clustering of these singletons showed no correlation between clusters and geographic origin of samples.

Of the 191 samples, a total of 66 (34.6%) were from Marseille and represented 40 different genotypes. This finding underscores the broad heterogeneity in T. whipplei. Twelve (18.5%) of the 66 tested samples were genotype 3, which might be linked to the local outbreak among homeless persons mentioned above. Genotype 1, which is endemic to France, was found in only 2 (3.1%) persons in Marseille. The fact that Marseille is a metropolitan area with a high migration rate could play a role in the vast diversity of T. whipplei genotypes found there

Questions regarding the epidemiologic character of Whipple disease remain unanswered, such as why the bacterium is highly prevalent but the disease is not. Persons with the putative immunological defect probably responsible for classic Whipple disease (1) have the highest bacterial load in their stools. But these persons are unlikely to come into direct contact with one another. Thus, propagation of this bacterium on a large scale might be relatively limited, which could explain the high genetic diversity in the bacterial specimens assessed so far.

Two predominant genotypes seem to break out of this pattern: genotypes 1 and 3. Genotype 3 could be considered a genotype that causes small epidemics, whereas genotype 1 could be considered a genotype endemic to central Europe. Reasons for the success of these 2 genotypes remain unknown, but improvement of genotyping methods could provide the answers.


Nils Wetzstein, Florence Fenollar, Sylvain Buffet, Verena Moos, Thomas Schneider, and Didier RaoultComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Université Aix-MarseilleMarseilles, France (N. Wetzstein, F. Fenollar, S. Buffet, D. Raoult); Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (N. Wetzstein, V. Moos, T. Schneider)



  1. Moos  V, Schneider  T. Changing paradigms in Whipple’s disease and infection with Tropheryma whipplei. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:11518. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fenollar  F, Keita  AK, Buffet  S, Raoult  D. Intrafamilial circulation of Tropheryma whipplei, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:94955. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Raoult  D, Fenollar  F, Rolain  JM, Minodier  P, Bosdure  E, Li  W, Tropheryma whipplei in children with gastroenteritis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:77682. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fenollar  F, Mediannikov  O, Socolovschi  C, Bassene  H, Diatta  G, Richet  H, Tropheryma whipplei bacteremia during fever in rural West Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:51521. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fenollar  F, Ponge  T, La  SB, Lagier  JC, Lefebvre  M, Raoult  D. First isolation of Tropheryma whipplei from bronchoalveolar fluid and clinical implications. J Infect. 2012;65:2758. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Keita  AK, Brouqui  P, Badiaga  S, Benkouiten  S, Ratmanov  P, Raoult  D, Tropheryma whipplei prevalence strongly suggests human transmission in homeless shelters. Int J Infect Dis. Epub 2012 Jul 11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Raoult  D, Ogata  H, Audic  S, Robert  C, Suhre  K, Drancourt  M, Tropheryma whipplei Twist: a human pathogenic Actinobacteria with a reduced genome. Genome Res. 2003;13:18009 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bentley  SD, Maiwald  M, Murphy  LD, Pallen  MJ, Yeats  CA, Dover  LG, Sequencing and analysis of the genome of the Whipple’s disease bacterium Tropheryma whipplei. Lancet. 2003;361:63744. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Li  W, Fenollar  F, Rolain  JM, Fournier  PE, Feurle  GE, Muller  C, Genotyping reveals a wide heterogeneity of Tropheryma whipplei. Microbiology. 2008;154:5217. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Keita  AK, Bassene  H, Tall  A, Sokhna  C, Ratmanov  P, Trape  JF, Tropheryma whipplei: a common bacterium in rural Senegal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1403. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1902.120709

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 2—February 2013

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Didier Raoult, Université Aix-Marseille, Unité des Rickettsies, URMITE UMR 7278 CNRS-IRD 198–INSERM 1095, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Blvd Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: January 22, 2013
Page updated: January 22, 2013
Page reviewed: January 22, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.